Extension of Public Comment Deadline and Next CCWG Meeting
Dear CCWG members, The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018. Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://doodle.com/poll/8tbdw863wer7cq8n Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
Thanks, I filled the doodle. Prior to the meeting, it would be good to have a summary report on the nature of the comments received. So far, at https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-initial-08... I see only one "comment", spread over several messages, which is not about the CCWG work in itself, i.e. on the proposed mechanisms or scope, but a grant proposal in its own right, supported by many apparently, and related to better outreach for the global TLD market. As it happens, this particular idea has some issues attached to it that needs to be re-discussed (it's in the example list, last one). IMO, it's clearly not the right time for this proposal to be discussed, and if the added review time is just to gain more support for a particular proposal, it's just wasted time, for them and for us, delaying the grant program real start. People sending their support will have to redo it when the framework for accepting projects is up and running. As it stands, I'm a bit concerned - and I'd like a clarification by the staff or chairs, or whoever feels entitled - that the intent of this proposal is to actually create a specific mechanism, at the structural level of the future ICANN Auction grant agency (for lack of a better name), just to fund their project. If that is the case, then I am firmly opposed to this development. We worked 2 years on the mechanisms, with a clear open mind about what could be funded, and now is not the time to reopen our deliverable. So to summarize my reaction to the only comment we got so far: if it's a request for a proposal: it's later. If it's a request for a new mechanism: it's too late. Note that I nothing against the idea of a global markcomm program for TLDs for the masses, and I actually think this would be inline with some of the W3C's ideas about decentralization of social networking IDs and the likes, but process-wise, this proposal is out of line. On 2018-11-27 12:39, Emily Barabas wrote:
Dear CCWG members,
The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018.
Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://doodle.com/poll/8tbdw863wer7cq8n
Kind regards, Emily
Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
Dear Daniel - I hope that we will receive more comments during the extended public comment period. We certainly will review the incoming comments and will judge them against our goals and obligations, as we have defined them in our initial report. Personally I believe that new ideas will not find the support from the broader AC/SO community but this is something we should discuss after the comment period will close. Let us wait until we have received more comments - hopefully - and until we all had a chance to review these comments. Warmest regards, Erika Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 27, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> wrote:
Thanks, I filled the doodle.
Prior to the meeting, it would be good to have a summary report on the nature of the comments received.
So far, at https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-initial-08...
I see only one "comment", spread over several messages, which is not about the CCWG work in itself, i.e. on the proposed mechanisms or scope, but a grant proposal in its own right, supported by many apparently, and related to better outreach for the global TLD market. As it happens, this particular idea has some issues attached to it that needs to be re-discussed (it's in the example list, last one).
IMO, it's clearly not the right time for this proposal to be discussed, and if the added review time is just to gain more support for a particular proposal, it's just wasted time, for them and for us, delaying the grant program real start. People sending their support will have to redo it when the framework for accepting projects is up and running.
As it stands, I'm a bit concerned - and I'd like a clarification by the staff or chairs, or whoever feels entitled - that the intent of this proposal is to actually create a specific mechanism, at the structural level of the future ICANN Auction grant agency (for lack of a better name), just to fund their project. If that is the case, then I am firmly opposed to this development. We worked 2 years on the mechanisms, with a clear open mind about what could be funded, and now is not the time to reopen our deliverable.
So to summarize my reaction to the only comment we got so far: if it's a request for a proposal: it's later. If it's a request for a new mechanism: it's too late.
Note that I nothing against the idea of a global markcomm program for TLDs for the masses, and I actually think this would be inline with some of the W3C's ideas about decentralization of social networking IDs and the likes, but process-wise, this proposal is out of line.
On 2018-11-27 12:39, Emily Barabas wrote: Dear CCWG members, The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018. Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://doodle.com/poll/8tbdw863wer7cq8n Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
Getting the ICANN web page updated with the extension is first priority. I hope that happens yet in the next two hours. sadly, my personal emails that an extension is underway cannot be the official word. :-) Marilyn Cade ________________________________ From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 9:16 AM To: Daniel Dardailler Cc: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Extension of Public Comment Deadline and Next CCWG Meeting Dear Daniel - I hope that we will receive more comments during the extended public comment period. We certainly will review the incoming comments and will judge them against our goals and obligations, as we have defined them in our initial report. Personally I believe that new ideas will not find the support from the broader AC/SO community but this is something we should discuss after the comment period will close. Let us wait until we have received more comments - hopefully - and until we all had a chance to review these comments. Warmest regards, Erika Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 27, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> wrote:
Thanks, I filled the doodle.
Prior to the meeting, it would be good to have a summary report on the nature of the comments received.
I see only one "comment", spread over several messages, which is not about the CCWG work in itself, i.e. on the proposed mechanisms or scope, but a grant proposal in its own right, supported by many apparently, and related to better outreach for the global TLD market. As it happens, this particular idea has some issues attached to it that needs to be re-discussed (it's in the example list, last one).
IMO, it's clearly not the right time for this proposal to be discussed, and if the added review time is just to gain more support for a particular proposal, it's just wasted time, for them and for us, delaying the grant program real start. People sending their support will have to redo it when the framework for accepting projects is up and running.
As it stands, I'm a bit concerned - and I'd like a clarification by the staff or chairs, or whoever feels entitled - that the intent of this proposal is to actually create a specific mechanism, at the structural level of the future ICANN Auction grant agency (for lack of a better name), just to fund their project. If that is the case, then I am firmly opposed to this development. We worked 2 years on the mechanisms, with a clear open mind about what could be funded, and now is not the time to reopen our deliverable.
So to summarize my reaction to the only comment we got so far: if it's a request for a proposal: it's later. If it's a request for a new mechanism: it's too late.
Note that I nothing against the idea of a global markcomm program for TLDs for the masses, and I actually think this would be inline with some of the W3C's ideas about decentralization of social networking IDs and the likes, but process-wise, this proposal is out of line.
On 2018-11-27 12:39, Emily Barabas wrote: Dear CCWG members, The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018. Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoodle.com%2Fpoll%2F8tbdw863wer7cq8n&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=QYvUHF58Ajt2yzNylla0tgKm2yRkHy5m5OWf375zB5Q%3D&reserved=0 Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
Thanks Marilyn, this is in process with our web management team. Kind regards, Emily From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 at 15:35 To: "erika@erikamann.com" <erika@erikamann.com>, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> Cc: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Extension of Public Comment Deadline and Next CCWG Meeting Getting the ICANN web page updated with the extension is first priority. I hope that happens yet in the next two hours. sadly, my personal emails that an extension is underway cannot be the official word. :-) Marilyn Cade ________________________________ From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 9:16 AM To: Daniel Dardailler Cc: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Extension of Public Comment Deadline and Next CCWG Meeting Dear Daniel - I hope that we will receive more comments during the extended public comment period. We certainly will review the incoming comments and will judge them against our goals and obligations, as we have defined them in our initial report. Personally I believe that new ideas will not find the support from the broader AC/SO community but this is something we should discuss after the comment period will close. Let us wait until we have received more comments - hopefully - and until we all had a chance to review these comments. Warmest regards, Erika Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 27, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> wrote:
Thanks, I filled the doodle.
Prior to the meeting, it would be good to have a summary report on the nature of the comments received.
So far, at https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fpipermail%2Fcomments-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-initial-08oct18%2F2018q4%2Fdate.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=%2FvXYiZvWr55yPPXCOXAUZ3X0lRorYe%2BQ7XrscRkSO98%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...>
I see only one "comment", spread over several messages, which is not about the CCWG work in itself, i.e. on the proposed mechanisms or scope, but a grant proposal in its own right, supported by many apparently, and related to better outreach for the global TLD market. As it happens, this particular idea has some issues attached to it that needs to be re-discussed (it's in the example list, last one).
IMO, it's clearly not the right time for this proposal to be discussed, and if the added review time is just to gain more support for a particular proposal, it's just wasted time, for them and for us, delaying the grant program real start. People sending their support will have to redo it when the framework for accepting projects is up and running.
As it stands, I'm a bit concerned - and I'd like a clarification by the staff or chairs, or whoever feels entitled - that the intent of this proposal is to actually create a specific mechanism, at the structural level of the future ICANN Auction grant agency (for lack of a better name), just to fund their project. If that is the case, then I am firmly opposed to this development. We worked 2 years on the mechanisms, with a clear open mind about what could be funded, and now is not the time to reopen our deliverable.
So to summarize my reaction to the only comment we got so far: if it's a request for a proposal: it's later. If it's a request for a new mechanism: it's too late.
Note that I nothing against the idea of a global markcomm program for TLDs for the masses, and I actually think this would be inline with some of the W3C's ideas about decentralization of social networking IDs and the likes, but process-wise, this proposal is out of line.
On 2018-11-27 12:39, Emily Barabas wrote: Dear CCWG members, The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018. Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoodle.com%2Fpoll%2F8tbdw863wer7cq8n&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=QYvUHF58Ajt2yzNylla0tgKm2yRkHy5m5OWf375zB5Q%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...> Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...>
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...>
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...>
Dear all, The public comment page has been updated with the new public comment period close date: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-auction-proceeds-initial-2018... An announcement will be posted on the ICANN website shortly and will be promoted on social media once posted: https://www.icann.org/news/announcements Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 at 16:07 To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com>, "erika@erikamann.com" <erika@erikamann.com>, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> Cc: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Extension of Public Comment Deadline and Next CCWG Meeting Thanks Marilyn, this is in process with our web management team. Kind regards, Emily From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 at 15:35 To: "erika@erikamann.com" <erika@erikamann.com>, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> Cc: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Extension of Public Comment Deadline and Next CCWG Meeting Getting the ICANN web page updated with the extension is first priority. I hope that happens yet in the next two hours. sadly, my personal emails that an extension is underway cannot be the official word. :-) Marilyn Cade ________________________________ From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 9:16 AM To: Daniel Dardailler Cc: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Extension of Public Comment Deadline and Next CCWG Meeting Dear Daniel - I hope that we will receive more comments during the extended public comment period. We certainly will review the incoming comments and will judge them against our goals and obligations, as we have defined them in our initial report. Personally I believe that new ideas will not find the support from the broader AC/SO community but this is something we should discuss after the comment period will close. Let us wait until we have received more comments - hopefully - and until we all had a chance to review these comments. Warmest regards, Erika Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 27, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> wrote:
Thanks, I filled the doodle.
Prior to the meeting, it would be good to have a summary report on the nature of the comments received.
So far, at https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fpipermail%2Fcomments-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-initial-08oct18%2F2018q4%2Fdate.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=%2FvXYiZvWr55yPPXCOXAUZ3X0lRorYe%2BQ7XrscRkSO98%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...>
I see only one "comment", spread over several messages, which is not about the CCWG work in itself, i.e. on the proposed mechanisms or scope, but a grant proposal in its own right, supported by many apparently, and related to better outreach for the global TLD market. As it happens, this particular idea has some issues attached to it that needs to be re-discussed (it's in the example list, last one).
IMO, it's clearly not the right time for this proposal to be discussed, and if the added review time is just to gain more support for a particular proposal, it's just wasted time, for them and for us, delaying the grant program real start. People sending their support will have to redo it when the framework for accepting projects is up and running.
As it stands, I'm a bit concerned - and I'd like a clarification by the staff or chairs, or whoever feels entitled - that the intent of this proposal is to actually create a specific mechanism, at the structural level of the future ICANN Auction grant agency (for lack of a better name), just to fund their project. If that is the case, then I am firmly opposed to this development. We worked 2 years on the mechanisms, with a clear open mind about what could be funded, and now is not the time to reopen our deliverable.
So to summarize my reaction to the only comment we got so far: if it's a request for a proposal: it's later. If it's a request for a new mechanism: it's too late.
Note that I nothing against the idea of a global markcomm program for TLDs for the masses, and I actually think this would be inline with some of the W3C's ideas about decentralization of social networking IDs and the likes, but process-wise, this proposal is out of line.
On 2018-11-27 12:39, Emily Barabas wrote: Dear CCWG members, The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018. Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoodle.com%2Fpoll%2F8tbdw863wer7cq8n&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=QYvUHF58Ajt2yzNylla0tgKm2yRkHy5m5OWf375zB5Q%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...> Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...>
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...>
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0 [apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__apc01.safelinks.protect...>
Daniel and colleagues I was a bit disappointed but not surprised that some thought this was a lobbying opportunity for "pick me/pick my preferred grant. That happens. BUT, I agree that we need to clarify that we are serious about input on mechanisms, and risks, oversight, etc. That is what I hope we can 'recall" to the community's attention. Perhaps we might do that even with a renewed webinar. We tend to think that the community knows what we know, as we have spent hundreds of hours as CCWG-AP, but in fact, they have real lives, and real day to day challenges. This two week extension might also benefit from a webinar that describes options, and makes it clear that it is not about applications but about structure and process and accountability. I live in perpetual recognition of how hard it is to devote time to these discussions and perpetual hope of good intentions of all who will comment. If we can get the two week extension.... ________________________________ From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 9:16 AM To: Daniel Dardailler Cc: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Extension of Public Comment Deadline and Next CCWG Meeting Dear Daniel - I hope that we will receive more comments during the extended public comment period. We certainly will review the incoming comments and will judge them against our goals and obligations, as we have defined them in our initial report. Personally I believe that new ideas will not find the support from the broader AC/SO community but this is something we should discuss after the comment period will close. Let us wait until we have received more comments - hopefully - and until we all had a chance to review these comments. Warmest regards, Erika Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 27, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> wrote:
Thanks, I filled the doodle.
Prior to the meeting, it would be good to have a summary report on the nature of the comments received.
I see only one "comment", spread over several messages, which is not about the CCWG work in itself, i.e. on the proposed mechanisms or scope, but a grant proposal in its own right, supported by many apparently, and related to better outreach for the global TLD market. As it happens, this particular idea has some issues attached to it that needs to be re-discussed (it's in the example list, last one).
IMO, it's clearly not the right time for this proposal to be discussed, and if the added review time is just to gain more support for a particular proposal, it's just wasted time, for them and for us, delaying the grant program real start. People sending their support will have to redo it when the framework for accepting projects is up and running.
As it stands, I'm a bit concerned - and I'd like a clarification by the staff or chairs, or whoever feels entitled - that the intent of this proposal is to actually create a specific mechanism, at the structural level of the future ICANN Auction grant agency (for lack of a better name), just to fund their project. If that is the case, then I am firmly opposed to this development. We worked 2 years on the mechanisms, with a clear open mind about what could be funded, and now is not the time to reopen our deliverable.
So to summarize my reaction to the only comment we got so far: if it's a request for a proposal: it's later. If it's a request for a new mechanism: it's too late.
Note that I nothing against the idea of a global markcomm program for TLDs for the masses, and I actually think this would be inline with some of the W3C's ideas about decentralization of social networking IDs and the likes, but process-wise, this proposal is out of line.
On 2018-11-27 12:39, Emily Barabas wrote: Dear CCWG members, The public comment period for the Initial Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group was originally scheduled to close today, 27 November 2018. Due to requests from community members to extend the deadline and provide additional time for input, the Co-Chairs are proposing to extend the public comment period by two weeks. The new close date will be 11 December 2018. Please take a moment to fill out this doodle poll to assist with scheduling a CCWG meeting the week of 17 December: https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoodle.com%2Fpoll%2F8tbdw863wer7cq8n&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=QYvUHF58Ajt2yzNylla0tgKm2yRkHy5m5OWf375zB5Q%3D&reserved=0 Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab3a739754284aba588608d65473066c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636789250337102227&sdata=6WTfD4Wap8lnEyBnZ7X9V%2BRLXiJL6mtXcZVpfLru5%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
participants (4)
-
Daniel Dardailler -
Emily Barabas -
Erika Mann -
Marilyn Cade