Dear Mr. Wang Wei:

Enclosed you will find what C and K agreed on Sep. 30, 2016.

There are four sheets of Hanja chars and one summary sheet.

Thanks. 

KIM< K. 

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:14 PM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> wrote:


On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:57 AM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:

Dear Prof. Kim

 

       In the attached excel, I listed the coordination records in CJK joint meeting Taipei.

       Please check if it is the same as your record.

 

       Among the total 261 original unacceptable variant groups (258 + 5F37+ 5191+ 9318),

In the round 0, 53+55 go to C rule (in you don’t mind C takes the 53 neutral groups), 50 go to K rule

      

In the round 1, 25 go to C rule, 13 go to K rule;

in the round 2, 2 go to C, 3 go to K;

which means, 25+13+2+3 = 43 variant groups have been solved.

 

C and K reached a consensus on above 201 variant groups, leaving 60 groups unsolved.

       Let’s work closely to iron out our differences of the rest 60 in the coming IETF meeting.

 

 

Regards

WANG Wei




--
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok



--
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok