Dear CGP members, Dear Hotta San

         Prof. Kim of KGP sent out a list of 258 group variants which are not considered as variants in K community.

         I am asking Prof.  Kim to provide more information about their disagreement.

         I will keep in touch with him and notify everyone the updates from K.

Regards

Wang Wei

发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2015年10月20日 6:43
收件人: 王伟
抄送: 박민정; 박신영; Dongman Lee; 김 민지; KIM Kyongsok; 신상현; 조성덕
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:03 AM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:

Dear Prof. Kim

Dear Mr. WANG:

         Thanks for the updates

         is this possible for KGP to give us the information about meaning difference or sound difference of these code points?

         Like 机（desk）and 機 （machine）

Sure.  Since I cannot do it myself (^-^),

I will ask my colleagues to do it.

The number of variant groups is 258 and

K characters involved will be more than 500.

Therefore, It might take some time.

I will let you know when the job is done.

Keep in touch.

KIM, K.

Wang Wei

发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2015年10月19日 16:17
收件人: 王伟
抄送: KIM Kyongsok; 박민정; 박신영; Dongman Lee; 김 민지
主题: Re: 答复: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups

Dear Mr. WANG:

Enclosed you will find four sheets.

The last sheet has data now.

Hear is a summary of our review:

2015.10.18.

Korea's position # variant groups

Acceptable 44

Partially Acceptable   1

Unacceptable             258

total                         303

Thanks.

Rgds,

KIM, K.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:49 PM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Wang:

Nice to hear from you again....

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:41 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:

Dear Prof. Kim


In your document

2.2  141 C variant groups: Not Acceptable
  - "Since the characters in C variant groups are NOT variants.  The characters in C variant groups have different meaning and/or sound."
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you mean "The characters in C variant groups are Not variant [in K language environment] " ??

Right.  Exactly.

                                                                                                        -----------------------------------------


2.3 135 to be reviewed
How's the review going? Have you get the final conclusion?

Sorry.  We made a conclusion.

Enclosed you will find four sheets.

However the last sheet does not have data yet.

I will send a completed sheet tomorrow.

Hear is a summary of our review:

2015.10.18.

Korea's position # variant groups

Acceptable 44

Partially Acceptable   1

Unacceptable             258

total                              303

Thanks...

KIM, K.

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok
发送时间: 2015年9月16日 15:02
收件人: chinesegp@icann.org
抄送: JapaneseGP@icann.org; koreanGP@icann.org; KIM Kyongsok
主题: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups

Dear CGP members:

Enclosed you will find Korea's
Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups.

Korea will appreciate if CGP would read Korea's review and respond with comments.

Thanks in advance.

Rgds,

KIM, K.

-----------------------------

Source: KLGP (Korean Language General Panel)

Date: 2015.09.10.

Subject: Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups

Action Requested for CGP: Please review this document and respond with comments


--
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok

--

김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok

--

김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok

--

김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok