February 2020 - comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mark Janssen Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of multiple .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains (or any other legacy TLD's). No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified, many CCtld's are much more affordable. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Mark Janssen Den Haag, Netherlands

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Kunert, Leon Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. I hope you still think about what made the internet such a great and diverse place. Best Regards Leon Kunert Hamburg, Hamburg Germany

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Someone clearly hasn't thought this through...If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
by jwz9sw+mlm0bimy04s4＠guerrillamail.com Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

After reading all the other previous comments I feel as if there is not much more that needs to be said. The increases start churning people significant profits, and those same increases give nothing back to those (often individuals such as myself) no additional benefit to the cost which is going to increase each year. So here's what's going to happen. I'm going to end up dropping my two .com domains, from there some hoarder will park them just because it was something that once existed, they're really not worth while for anyone, but in my case as like many others the net will be an ever increasing wasteland of abandoned domains that are all parked by others trying to sell domains. Pretty soon it'll be like a dark alley with a guy in a trench coat trying to sell you a domain! Anyways, jokes aside, this ability for everyone to start jacking up prices is going to be a slippery slope that's going to benefit no one other than the person that want's more money themselves with nothing in exchange for the increases. Everything is perfectly fine the way it is, leave shit alone... ---- Sent using Guerrillamail.com Block or report abuse: https://www.guerrillamail.com//abuse/?a=Qk55CAgOV6dYiwG5vX8SdxrDQM%2BexpoDi…

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Christopher D. Bartels Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of multiple .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Christopher D. Bartels Syracuse, New York United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Ricardo Ribalda Denmark

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by kj＠orbekk.com Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Kjetil Ørbekk New York, New York United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Yarom Global Enterprises Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Elad Yarom Fredericton, NB, Canada

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Michael Snyder Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a few .com domain names, for a small business, a high school reunion, a church, and personal email. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Sincerely, Michael Snyder Seattle, WA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Eric R. Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Signed, Eric New York, United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Watanabe Hana Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Null Shanghai， PR China.

1 0