lists.icann.org
Sign In Sign Up
Manage this list Sign In Sign Up

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview

comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20

Download
Threads by month
  • ----- 2026 -----
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2025 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2024 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2023 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2022 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2021 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2020 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

February 2020

  • 8935 participants
  • 9007 discussions
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by lengqie@foxmail.com Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. lengqie Chongqing, China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Cang Shui Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. cangshui Changsha, Hunan, China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Cyber Miami Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Gao HanJie Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 于 奇鹏 Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Yu Qipeng Tianjin, China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 10% Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. zy  Kunming, Yunnan, China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by David Yin Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. yinfor.com I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Binghui Yin Vancouver, British Columbia Canada ������ Windows 10 ���ʼ�<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>Ӧ��
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by zu1k Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. zu1k Beijing, Beijing China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by XuTong Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I support the proposed price increase which allows for a 31% price increase through 2024. Xu Tong Beijing, Beijing, China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Bamms Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Bamms Lagos, Lagos Nigeria
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Zheng Shaotong Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Shaotong Zheng Beijing, China
1 0
0 0
  • ← Newer
  • 1
  • ...
  • 851
  • 852
  • 853
  • 854
  • 855
  • 856
  • 857
  • ...
  • 901
  • Older →

HyperKitty Powered by HyperKitty version 1.3.12.