lists.icann.org
Sign In Sign Up
Manage this list Sign In Sign Up

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview

comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20

Download
Threads by month
  • ----- 2026 -----
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2025 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2024 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2023 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2022 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2021 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2020 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

February 2020

  • 8935 participants
  • 9007 discussions
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Oleksandr Skabelka Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by kevin bent Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry %2�� it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. kevin bent Chicago, Illinois United States Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Alvaro Gutierrez Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
CURRENT PRICE FOR DOT COM IS SUFFICIENT, CONSIDERING THAT THERE NOW THOUSANDS OF OTHER TLD AVAILABLE. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ALVARO GUTIERREZ AVENTURA Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Norbert Doetsch Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Norbert Doetsch Koblenz
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mohamed khaled Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a domainer . I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Mohamed Khaled qalub, Qalubiah Egypt
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the proposed Amendment 3
by Alec Larson Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Regards, Alec Larson Port Charlotte, Florida, United States
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] What's the need for price increase?
by Mayank Bhardwaj Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
Considering that internet/domain names have become a necessity at this point, what's the reasoning behind the proposed price increase? I am against this steady/blind price increase. A one off increase because the costs go up is probably OK. Not everything needs to be under a profit-as-much-as-you-can approach.
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Luc Faubert Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Luc / Faubert St-Sauveur ______________________ Luc Faubert
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by clinton sweatmanIII Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. wesley sweatman OakIsland, North Carolina United States Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Asogwa Chiedozie Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Asogwa Gerald Owerri, Imo State Nigeria
1 0
0 0
  • ← Newer
  • 1
  • ...
  • 856
  • 857
  • 858
  • 859
  • 860
  • 861
  • 862
  • ...
  • 901
  • Older →

HyperKitty Powered by HyperKitty version 1.3.12.