February 2020 - comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Wason Liu Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Wason Liu Mianyang,Sichuan,China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Adrian McKeown Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. A McKeown Auckland, Auckland New Zealand

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Strongly Oppose move to increase .COM prices
by XLNC News Network Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

To all concerned, I would like to register my strong opposition to any increase in .COM prices. The move is selfish and disguised attempt to fleece the end customers. It will only benefit Verisign and increase its revenues. Please refrain from this move. Thanks, Team XLNC New Delhi, India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by chen Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than the cost of their job: manage the .COM Registry. They have no reason to increase the price. Jack Chen Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jason Dolman Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. JASON DOLMAN Oshawa, Ontario Canada

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by tracey sclater Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am associated with the secondary market in domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. tracey sclater kinka beach . queensland. australia Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by hi＠nai.ba Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by jerel brandt Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. Jerel Brandt Oroville, California United States Thank

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Dont Increase rate .com domain
by Aamir Kadral Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Burden to small business
by jarrod.smith＠gmail.com Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a small/individual business who has registered a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The proposed annual increases are more than double the rate of inflation and income increases. Therefore the proposed rate increases are opportunistic and motived by something other than market forces. If Verisign cannot maintain .COM rates that follow in lockstep with the rest of the economy, provision of these services should be put out for bid so that competition can work for the consumer. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. . This proposal is in Verisign's interest and contrary to the public interest. Sincerely, Jarrod Smith

1 0