February 2020 - comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] About dot com domain price rising
by Mp Sandhu Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

The domains are already being black marketed by some domain registrars, one have to research for cheapest registrar to get the right price, if one registrar gives cheap registration then he takes three time price at renewal. So customers are already being looted by these types of registrars. My opinion is, if you decide to rise the price of domains then give your time to regulate these types of renewal loots. Regards

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by yzb Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name.  I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Tao Hefei, Anhui China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Leander Timoshenko Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Leander Timoshenko

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Concentra Inc Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

Hello, I am associated with a registry. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. David Ebene CyberCity

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by musprint＠yahoo.com Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry %2�� it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Ahmed Saleh Cairo, Cairo Governorate Egypt

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Dr.Gregg McNair Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

Dear Sirs I am associated with the secondary market in domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. When in history did the grass roots stakeholders ever recommend or discuss the abdication of registry pricing oversight for legacy gTLDs? The new gTLD agreement was created for new extensions not the preexisting registries. Why would ICANN accept $20m from Verisign in what appears to be grease money to ensure they can rip off .COM registrants of BILLIONS of dollars? We registrants always expected ICANN would continue its management of legacy registries in the interests of its constituents, not aid and abet a virtual monopoly by abdictation of reasonable pricing management. It's not too late to admit mistakes have been made on all legacy gTLDs registry renewals and reverse both. ORG and. COM price control oversight. Thank you Dr. Gregg McNair Panama City Dr.Gregg McNair Group Chairman Premium Traffic Limited Panama E: ggg(a)PTL.com C: +1 512 698 0407 S: gemcnair

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment on Amendment 3
by John Smith Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

Prices are just fine the way they are. The lower they are, the more democratic it allows the internet to be. If there are to be any price increases, they should be pegged to the rate of inflation.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Happy Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the proposed price increase.
by Ronak Patel Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. There should not be monopoly in this market. Regards, Ronak India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by chandan Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. chandan Bengaluru, Karnataka India

1 0