lists.icann.org
Sign In Sign Up
Manage this list Sign In Sign Up

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview

comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20

Download
Threads by month
  • ----- 2026 -----
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2025 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2024 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2023 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2022 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2021 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2020 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

February 2020

  • 8935 participants
  • 9007 discussions
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Edison Jwa Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Edison Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mr. Khalili - IT Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Hossein Khalili Qom, Qom Iran
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 3lvdQ ZnVja Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Takahiro YOSHIDA Tokyo, Japan
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 18141901238@189.cn Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 姜 宇 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. ChiangYu China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by info@gay.run Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. 唐立春 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Lei Zixian Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Lei Chongqing, China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 皮皮虾 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. PPXWO ChengDu, Sichuan, China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 胡 女士 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. hu xiujun Zhengzhou, Henan, China
1 0
0 0
[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 2301553244 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020
I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Wang Hongxiao Foshan, Guangdong, China
1 0
0 0
  • ← Newer
  • 1
  • ...
  • 868
  • 869
  • 870
  • 871
  • 872
  • 873
  • 874
  • ...
  • 901
  • Older →

HyperKitty Powered by HyperKitty version 1.3.12.