- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Wholesale price increases for .com names
by John Peachey Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am opposed to increases in wholesale charges for .com names. The .com names I use are for charities and .com is chosen because it is the most used and most memorable for the general public. Please reconsider and find another more equitable solution for any required funding. Thank you!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] We are against the proposed increases iCANN !!
by Christine Redfern Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please do not increase .com domain costs!
by Casey Fenton Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Thank you!!! -- caseyfenton.com Bio: https://docs.upstock.io/bio Book: https://docs.upstock.io/book WhatsApp: +1-415-786-4546 Slush Helsinki Talk: https://youtu.be/33gw9AKI43o TEDxTALK: https://youtu.be/Tjc5WYLu4mU

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposing to the price hike
by Michelle Ang Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi We write to express our concern of the price hike and we oppose of such plan. Michelle Ang MSc BSc (Hons) MSCSI MRICS Green Property REIT Ventures DAC 32 Molesworth Street, Dublin, D02 Y512 T +353 1 241 8400 DD + 353 1 241 8411 M +353 87 916 9902

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comments on amendment
by Riatan Ufomaduh Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This contract allows for other price increases, ultimately making .COM domains less accessible and more expensive for everybody. Please we do not want this.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN Changes
by Rayelle Garrick Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To whom it may concern, These changes will impact my business significantly for the next 10 years due to my being in the digital marketing space and I would prefer if these changes do not happen. With everything increasing, we need to be conservative with pricing and this is not helping anyone in our industry on my level. This is all about money, shame on you.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] proposed dotcom price increases
by Clive Brown Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

We believe the internet to be a communal space. Yes it costs money to run it but no private company or corporation should be able to hold users to ransom, in effect, by controlling the price of their usage. Settle on an independently arbitrated rate and stick to it, with possible 5 or 10 year readjustments due to inflation, if necessaryn.b. there are a lot of small personal users who will be adversely affected by this. Yours Clive Brown Richmond CA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Do Not Raise Prices for Registration of TLDs
by Ed Novak Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I have a Ph.D in computer science and I am currently an assistant professor at Franklin and Marshall College in Lancaster, PA. I am writing to urge ICANN and Verisign NOT to raise the prices of the top level domain ".com" Doing so directly hurts a variety of small enterprises and individuals and therefore is harmful to the web in general. When .com domains (by far the most popular TLD) become more expensive it discourages small businesses, individuals, startups, and other similar small / new enterprises from creating their own websites. They will likely turn to alternative "walled gardens" to publish content on the web such as social media platforms. Instead of being able to act independently and build their brand on a neutral, equal opportunity platform they are pushed to grow and reinforce the already massive social media companies. They are also then subject to the rules, policies, and procedures of these companies. Additionally, for many organizations that already hold a .com TLD there is entrenchment. They have built a business and a brand on their TLD website. These price changes are going to extract money from these companies, forcing them to pay more for the same service being provided. This is unfair to those organizations and consolidates large sums of money to an already powerful organization (Verisign). Cheap .com domains help enable innovation, new ideas, original content, and startup businesses. They keep the web an open and free place, and they encourage exploration and independence. A marketplace with more independent actors is more divergent, exciting, and creative. -- -Professor Novak

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Not cool
by Rachel Pratt Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I oppose this agreement. The rules for this type of thing need to be laid out in detail and .com prices are already way too high. Thanks, RACHEL PRATT | Vice President of Operations BEX | www.azbex.com<http://www.azbex.com/> | bex-events.com<http://bex-events.com/> 1690 N. McClintock Dr. Tempe, AZ 85281 (480) 227-2620 | rpratt(a)azbex.com<mailto:rpratt@azbex.com> [cid:image001.jpg@01D5E0B7.5F0CF7A0]

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN Non-profit status?
by john aucoin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The news of proposed changes to the contract ICANN has with VeriSign, Inc. is a concern to everyone downstream of them, to say the least. What led to this? A lack of financial prudence? ICANN's unrealistic political and operational targets? A view to increasing profits? When you're talking about increased prices and you're allowed to do that at VeriSign, I don't know that's going to produce any better safety or security from anyone who's paying that additional cost. There is nothing that tells us that would be the case. On the wrong side of history VeriSign and ICANN seem to have us over a barrel. This agreement gives a perpetual monopoly to a company and the power to enact unregulated price increases. This has serious anti-competitive implications. This is not how a non-profit, essentially a public trust, should be run. The resolution of your long-standing and costly litigation with VeriSign is not our responsibility and the cost should not be imposed on us. Should ICANN's non-profit status be revoked and the administering of these services be considered a public utility? Stop this foolishness and set a price cap. Ensure that the internet remains a level playing field. Sincerely, John Aucoin Montreal, Canada Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] oppose: Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Andy Kegel Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I oppose Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. This increases costs for all users with no visible benefit. The sole benefit seems to be to increase profits at a monopoly provider. As a user of DNS and as an owner of DNS .com entries, I receive no benefit whatsoever for the increased costs. In the world of electronics and computing, services consistently DECREASE in costs and DNS costs should be dropping in the same way. Thanks, -andrew kegel, Washington, USA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please don't increase ICANN fees
by Nisha Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICAAN & Verisign
by Karl Buckland Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to formally complain regarding the changes made to the contract between ICANN and Verisign, Inc. who operate the .COM top-level-domain (TLD). To my understanding, these changes were made behind closed doors without any public consultation and without an open tender to other businesses. The possible price increases to .com domain names could see prices increase dramatically. I request that this decision is reviewed and adjusted accordingly. Either it should be opened up to competition, or further control should be put into place to prevent the current changes. The proposed changes should not go ahead as-is. Yours faithfully, Karl Buckland

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against raise!!!
by Michael Negele Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, We need stable and fair prices as the people of this planet. Technology is supposed to make the lives easier and cheaper - not more expensive. Please do not raise our domain prices! With best regards, Michael Negele Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposition to Amendment 3
by Dugi Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I would like to voice my opposition to Proposed Amendment 3. I can't afford to pay exorbitant prices for my domains each year - I can barely afford them as is. I've already been forced to let several of my domains expire. This will hurt the internet as we know it and will result in a less diverse, money-fueled trade. I don’t believe we want this for the internet — Please don’t taint it for the sake of money and greed. Please, think of the struggling entrepreneurs like me who can't afford this - you'll be taking away their business fronts. Nobody benefits from this except Verisign. Best regards, Dugaxhin Surdulli

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price Hike
by serina williams Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom it May Concern: Small business owners cannot afford additional costs to how we conduct business. Every penny counts. Please do not raise prices for hosting websites. Kindest regards, Serina Williams

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] America is getting greedy - The whole world sees it
by /O=FIRST ORGANIZATION/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=00037FFE108CC10F Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN leadership. Raising the prices on domain names arbitrarily will only smother the growth to new start-ups, like ourselves. Yes, the prices of everything is going up, without accountability to the public – and Yes, your company also needs to be able to operate, despite others raising their prices to you, but to NOT provide a public accounting of why you are raising your prices and NOT showing that your increases closely match those you are receiving, smacks of just pure greed on behalf of your leadership! Because many Others are doing this at this time is why so many Americans are turning to socialism, as America is beginning to look hopeless! Please add-in some public accountability for public feedback, before raising your prices, to show some decency in your business. This is the way to show that your company is not deceiving your customers and to show that you are a responsible and respectable company!! No wonder many other countries are beginning to think that Americans are PIGS! Sincerely, Stephen Philpy Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] proposed dotcom price increases
by Clive Brown Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

We believe the internet to be a communal space. Yes it costs money to run it but no private company or corporation should be able to hold users to ransom, in effect, by controlling the price of their usage. Settle on an independently arbitrated rate and stick to it, with possible 5 or 10 year readjustments due to inflation, if neccessary Yours Clive Brown Richmond CA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Icann
by Morgan Jaye Williams Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Increasing the cost of domain registration will not only lower the number of websites, but also limit the voice of freedom. This to me seems another planned move by the corporate oligarchy to suppress free speech and opportunity to the people. Vote this proposal down or risk the threat of increased civil unrest.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Why I have to pay more for my domains ??
by Wilson Ccasihue S. Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against unfounded .com price increase
by lkdsub0＠gmail.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, It is not clear for me why allowing huge increases in .com domains costs is allowed. I also see a lack of transparency on how these funds will be used. Please reconsider the negative impact this will have on thousands of domain owners, for the benefits of a few. Many thanks, Laurent

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I Disagree With The Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Caleb Roseme Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This proposal should have been presented to the ICANN community and Internet users for incorporating feedback. *Caleb Roseme, * *Chief Operating Officer* *Assured Quality Homecare* Educating professional caregivers and families. *Office:* (860) 373-0428 | *Fax: *(860) 909-0013 *Email: *caleb(a)asqhomecare.com *Web: *www.asqhomecare.com LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/assured-quality-homecare-llc> | Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/asqhomecare/> | Connect With Me <http://linkedin.com/in/calebroseme/> | Rate Us On Google! <http://WWW.RATEASQ.COM> Nationally Recognized Best of Homecare® <https://www.caring.com/senior-care/connecticut/norwich/assured-quality-home…> Company 2019 Best of Readers Choice <http://thedayimag.com/bestof/2019/index.html?bookmarks=46&fbclid=IwAR3SdJUS…> Top 3 Homecare Agency License # HCA0001088 -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is solely for use by the intended recipient and may contain information that is confidential and privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or forwarding of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender via reply email and destroy the original and all copies of this message and its attachments.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment Against Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Phil Murwin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The proposed amendment to allow for the increase of .COM registration prices is not in the interest of the public nor the health of the domain name registration system. The increased prices would hurt individual .COM domain owners and small businesses, creating a barrier and reducing their valued and longstanding internet presences. This amendment would reduce the trust that the public has placed in the domain name system and could potentially lead to the fracturing of the system and the creation of competing systems. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards, Phillip Murwin

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] BAD for US
by Jacob Hämmerle Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Love the Internet and its creators!!! [image: logo] *Dr. med. Jacob Hämmerle*| Mail: jh(a)eckquarters.com | Mobile: +43 6767 11111 0

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3 disapproval
by Ryan Gunn Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The amendment, the process behind it, the potential impacts to the internet community as a whole, the usage of funds and funds accountability all need to be transparent. At this point they're not. Until that time, I disapprove this proposal.Ryan Gunn @gunnship.com

1 0