- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] $20m bribe
by Aaron Mader Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Don't be greedy ICANN. -- Aaron Mader Software Developer litiks.com 289.812.3835

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] We reject the abusive and obscure increase provided for in the contract with Verisign Inc.
by Andre Vacari Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

ICANN is changing the contract with Verisign to allow for increases of 70% (7% per year) or more on ".com" domains for years to come. This sounds like collusion for corruption, as the fate of this money is uncertain and unclear. Few are aware of ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), which is responsible for managing and coordinating the DNS and distributing IP addresses. It looks like alphabet soup, but this organization directly affects every connection to the Internet, from Servers of sites like Facebook, Google, etc., to all cell phones and computers in the world. All internet services will suffer in some way from this abusive and unjustified increase. If you want to help pressure ICANN to withdraw this abusive increase from the Verisign contract, please sign this manifest or send an email to comments-com-ameditation-3-03jan20(a)icann.org with the following text: We, users of the domain registration system and the Internet, repudiate the abusive and obscure increase provided for in the contract with Verisign Inc., and ask the California State authorities, the Basel Institute ( baselgovernance.org) to investigate and control the legitimacy of the actions and destination of the amounts collected, avoiding the illicit enrichment that any party with funds collected globally. *André Luís Vacari | *vacari(a)gmail.com +55 11 9.8480.7272 +55 11 9.8480.7171

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] thiefs
by Ovni Club Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Paula Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I heartily disagree with the proposed amendment 3 to the .com registry agreement. There appears to be no accountability to the public and certainly no accountability for the funds Versign is paying ICANN. No accountability whatsoever? I'm outraged! This will adversely affect the general public and small business owners the most. Paula Schlauch Would you like to offer surveys to your clients, but don't want to set them up yourself? We can do it for you. We offer a done-for-you service where we take care of the administration.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't rase the prise of .com
by Alex Stanin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Don't rase the prise of .com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Contract with Verisign & potential price increases
by Futuramax Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Madam/Sir we heard about your deal with Verisign and that you now wish to incorporate some sort of "dynamic rent increase" on .com domain renewals. While I understand you surely have to make a profit to run your business I would urge you to use care in determining how much the increase will be. .com domains traditionally have a good performance for their owners and you as the authority looking after them surely did a great job. Don't risk the reputation and trust gained in your domains just to make the "fast & easy $$$" at all your customer's expense. Be reasonable. Regards Christian Laekamp (futuramax.com)

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN PROPOSED AMEMDMENT
by Indiana Robinson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I disagree with the ICANN proposed increase in charges. They are too extreme for individuals such as myself who is just trying to get a presence on the web. What I am paying now is already too him just for a domain name. Hosting is extra and costly too. What are you trying to do? Make individual domains obsolete? Shameful. Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] unjustified
by Yasin TGL Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

It should not be this complicated. Unjustified price hikes are appalling and I would stop using .com altogether and advise against it to all clients.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price increases
by Curt Wall Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This letter is to voice my disapproval of ICANN's proposal to increase .COM domains in the near future. This action has not taken into account the opinions of the ICANN or internet community and will subject these users to significant and unnecessary price increases, making domains less accessible and unable to maintain for the average user. As well, full disclosure as to how these extra funds will be specifically used has not been made aware. Considering this, I ask that this needless increase be scrapped. Curtis Wall

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposition to Amendment
by John Colascione Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

*I write in to oppose the Amendment to the .COM Registry Agreement which would allow price increases in .com domain names. I am an owner of .com domain names and provide affiliated registry services as well as register domain .com names for clients. I believe ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest.* *With that said, those evaluating the proposed price increase or removal of price caps need only ask themselves, what public good is achieved by allowing the only provider of .com domain registrations and renewals to increase prices?* *The only thing that is achieved is consumers will pay more for the same registration and use rights. What public good does this serve when the company wishing to have these price increases is already overwhelmingly profitable from what it already does as is.* John Colascione *Chief Executive OfficerInternet Marketing Services Inc. 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite P-300 West Palm Beach, FL 33401United States of Americahttps://www.searchen.com <https://www.searchen.com>Part of SEARCHEN NETWORKS® (561) 370-7366* *The terms SEARCHEN ®, SEARCHEN NETWORKS ® and SERIOUS ABOUT SEARCH **® **are federally registered trademarks of Internet Marketing Services Inc.Confidentiality note: This e-mail transmission is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information that is covered by the electronic communications privacy act (18 USC Sections 2510-2521). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this email, please delete this message and any attachment from your system and notify the author by replying to this email or telephoning * *Internet Marketing Services Inc. at 1 (631) 587-7050. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely on this email or attachment or any part of them in any form whatsoever. Any unauthorized use or disclosure may be unlawful.*

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposition
by Maxime Morlet Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I would like to voice my opposition to Proposed Amendment 3. I believe that the global DNS registration system should be run primarily as a public concern. The only entities that stand to benefit from the proposed arrangement are verisign itself, at the expense of the public. These price hikes will impact the millions of small, independent businesses and developers that rely on the system as is to make their livelihood. Further, this could prove yet another point of pressure that convinces a small business to make their online presence exclusively in the Facebook walled garden and eschew the web itself. The web, and global DNS, were envisioned to be run for the public good, and they SHOULD be run for the public good. Deals such as this are an abdication of that mandate; short sighted profit chasing at the expense of all else. Please do not adopt this proposal.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM PRICE INCREASES
by JoAne Baptiste-Cummins Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom It May Concern, Please keep .COM prices low. The Internet and E-Commerce are the equal playing field for millions of individuals. It's an opportunity to start new business, have some control and economic benefits from your own creative contents. It's the chance for many to join the economy as owners with an accessible entry point. Increasing fees makes it that much harder for the small business man and woman to enter the arena. The millions of dollars produced by the increase of small businesses,keeps families and towns surviving. Keep prices down and keep the worldwide web and ecommerce accessible for all! Respectfully, JoAne Baptiste-Cummins hs

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Hans Gallardo Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, We are a little company from Bolivia, here the domain names is very important to our company's at our country, right now is expensive and people cannot register domains names, just companys. Please think in people who want begin a business. Don't increase the price the domain names. Thank you. [WEBHOSTING BOLIVIA] Hans Gallardo Soporte Técnico | WEBHOSTING BOLIVIA | Servidores M: 71490444<tel:71490444> E: hans(a)webhosting.com.bo<mailto:hans@webhosting.com.bo> www.webhosting.com.bo<https://www.webhosting.com.bo/> [cid:image002.png@01D5E0C2.D48E7200]<https://fb.com/hostingbolivia>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Your (ICANN) planned .COM Price increase, taking money from Verisign and failure to consult your customers
by Adebunmi Adeniran Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sir / Madam This is to ask you to review your closed door agreement with VERISIGN in connection with planned price increase as this does not look good to us the general public of .com owners and Internet users. It has come to light that VERISIGN pledged you ICANN, the sum of $20 million dollars over the next 5 years. This in my opinion does not look good as it implies something completely different that it can even be interpreted as bribery? For how can you a regulator, take money from one of the companies you are supposed to regulate? I am hereby asking you to do the following, that our (that is, us the public) faith in you may be restored 1. The public be consulted over this matter 2. Transparent system of operation 3. That you, ICANN to incorporate feedback from the ICANN community and Internet users 4. Accountability becomes a priority 5. No more deals behind closed doors 6. And that you take our public opinion seriously and stop ignoring our unified opposition against your action Above all, please respect the office and trust you have been given. I have decided to write you as I believe in the word of Martin Luther King Jnr. that “it’s not the deeds of the evil one, but the silent majority”. I have chosen not to e silent on this matter. Yours sincerely Dasola Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Alex MacDonald Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a small business owner and strongly oppose the raising of prices for .COM domain names. There is no need, and far more importantly, it would only hinder the equal playing field and the growth opportunities that the internet provides. Alex MacDonald Louisville, KY

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by kyogesh91 Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I am writing to voice my opposition to Proposed Amendment 3. Despite there clearly being potential financial gains to be had by raising the registration fee on .com domains, the global DNS registration system should be run primarily as a public concern. The only entities that stand to benefit from the proposed arrangement are verisign itself, at the expense of the public. While price hikes such as this likely won't mean much to the larger business concerns that buy in bulk, it will impact the millions of small, independent businesses and developers that rely on the system as is to make their livelihood. At worst, this could prove yet another point of pressure that convinces a small business to make their online presence exclusively in the Facebook walled garden and eschew the web itself. The web, and global DNS, were envisioned to be run for the public good, and they SHOULD be run for the public good. Deals such as this are an abdication of that mandate; short sighted profit chasing at the expense of all else. Please do not adopt this proposal. Best, Yogesh K

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed increase in domain prices
by Ed Collins Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, The proposed increases in domain prices is concerning, especially when Verisign is paying you $20 million. I do not support these increases, and I urge you to be more transparent in the future. Thank you, ----------------------------------------------------- Ed Collins | The College Church of SDA 337 Main St., PO Box 877 | www.thecollegechurch.com <http://www.thecollegechurch.com/> So. Lancaster, MA 01561 | 978-368-2130 voice -----------------------------------------------------

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM new deals
by Wael Wahby Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sir/Madam, I heard that there was a new deal between Verisign & ICANN Regarding the .COM domains. I hope that this doesn’t affect the prices of domain names. Thank you and best regards, Wael Wahby

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ABORT THE INCREASE OF DOT COM PRICES
by Ivan Sršen Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I, Ivan Srsen, owner of several dozen of dot com domains strongly oppose the new ICAAN deal with Verisign that would result in a price increase of dot com domains. Your price-gauging practices are abhorrent, and you're monopolizing a free resource simply to line your own pockets. Go fuck yourself ICAAN, and leave the internet free and unfettered as it's supposed to be. Regards, Ivan Srsen

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No.
by jamie preston Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please stop the proposed fee increase for .com domain names. No no no no no.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Shashank Jaiswal Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Yours truly, Shashank

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jason Sheppard Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Jason Sheppard GREENSBORO, NC

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Not agreed with the .com price increase.
by Sang Min Sin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

for me its already hard to maintain my domains with the current fee of domain renewals. i am an investor on domain names and websites administrator. Am not an big player, indeed, a small one. totally disagree with the price increase of .com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Farmer with a .com
by Jessie Holland Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To whom it may concern: I am a small time farmer in Ohio who has built a website which I utilize as a powerful networking and marketing tool. Please don't increase the price of domains as this would really hinder progress from small businesses and farms that wouldn't be able to pay annually for this increase. Our profit margins are already so small, this would really affect our business. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely,Jessie HollandHubbard, OH

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Iniyan Selvamani Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Iniyan Selvamani Chennai, Tamil Nadu India

1 0