- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Increase in .com price
by Sunil V Pillai Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I came to know the change in price for.com domains through namecheap through whom I have purchased couple of domains. Like what they mentioned without prior notice or intimation if prices are increased everyone are getting affected. Please reconsider the decision. FreshMarqt.com & etherealindia.com are the domains. Thanks, Sunil Sent from my Windows 10 device

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Charge should not increased
by Sabananthan V Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, Small business owner like me have tough situation in focusing busing growth and to get profit. Increasing charge .com will impact my business and no other option except closing domain and go with free domain. So request to make amendment to charges less to look for small business domains. Thanks, Saba

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Fees increased for.COM level is not a good idea
by Mahesh Patel Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Why do you need to increase the fees. You are making all pure profits still why do you need to increase prices. Just to maken yourself more rich?? Internet should be accessible to everyone and everyone by default know..com, you price increase suggest that you want to bank on it. Just do not increase the prices please. Thank you

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Complaint about price change
by Thang Nguyen Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Keep price low, stop increase it. You're already make a lot of money now.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price Raise
by Becca Puckly Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please do not start raising the price of .com websites. This will impact small businesses greatly.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Increases of .com Domain prices
by Baris Kayar Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I condemn your dirty games about domain prices. with what right do you try to increase domain prices? people will not use "com" domains and you will go away. The feature of the browsers automatically converting the domain name to dot com is removed and you will see your midwife's cunt in reverse. you are despicable, dishonest and thief. Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] NO to Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Benny Jimenez Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, Transparency is an important ingredient of a democracy an open process, this should be discussed with more than 3 days to see if changes makes sense. I use .com alot an it should be easy accessible to the people. Regards, Benny

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I wish to raise my voice in opposition to the proposed amendment. The internet is the new frontier for Business and Entrepreneurs. To increase costs will not support new business startups. Also, with any TAX, there should be a SERVICE. I see no SERVICE increase, which would justify a Cost increase. I am opposed to this amendment.
by Joseph Ball Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] not ok.
by Gregg Salisbury Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

not ok, and not fair. a small increase could maybe be justified, but this has to be considered monopolisitic.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Badli Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi ICANN, In respect of your upgrade initiative, please maintain the .com price, we object any decision taken that lead increase .com price. Thanks Brgds Badli

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Extortion
by Christo Mayo Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This is extortion in play here guys, pull your heads in a behave. Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Micah Goodman Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I do not support the proposed change to the .com registry agreement.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I don't support ".Com" price increase.
by Debabrata Kundu Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I do not support the price increase of .com domain. And I think it is not right to increase the price without giving any notice to the all internet users. Thank you.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I Do Not Support
by Jessie Carter Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I do not support the changes made by ICANN on January 3, 2020 in it's contract with Verisign. I do not support the monopoly Verisign will have over .COM domains, nor the ridiculous price increases that could be made over the next 10 years. Please listen to the community and rethink this. - Jessie Carter

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Oppose amendment 3
by Umang Varma Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I am writing to express strong concern about the proposed amendment that would allow Verisign to increase registration fees for .COM domains. Allowing these changes would make .COM domains more inaccessible for personal websites and I strongly urge you to revert/reject these changes. Best, Umang

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM wholesale domain prices
by Christian Olson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

".COM wholesale domain prices can grow by more than 70% over and above current prices over the next decade." I see no logical reason to increase prices by that much. It honestly sounds like a covert way to nickel and dime the world to death and make a fortune price gouging everyone on something that has for the most part remained the same price for years. My friend at the FTC would love to hear about this.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] price increase in dotcom domains
by Blagovest Belev Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

A price increase will drive people away from .com to other domains. Also you are a monopoly, find out how to make a market based price discovery instead of deciding autocratically on the price. Bobby

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] The .com domain is super-important, and we're all a captive audience
by Chris Franklin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The .com domain is the most well-known top-level domain. Many of its users are, admittedly, big companies that can afford price increases, but there are also many of us, like me, that have purchased a domain just so we’d have a permanent email address without having to worry about the whims of whatever email provider we happen to sign up with. These type of changes to the ICANN contract again subject us to the whims of a private company, the very thing I hoped to avoid by buying my own domain.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mark Lavi Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I read https://www.icann.org/public-comments/com-amendment-3-2020-01-03-en. I believe there is a fundamental flaw in the proposal that shows a simple motivation on ICANN and Verisign to prevent competition and to introduce arbitrary price increases through vague, undefined terms. Firstly, the design of a well operating DNS and domain registry system should not have any single point of failure. By restricting this multi-year proposal to a single vendor, ICANN has shown a clear bias in not allowing any competition. VeriSign surely is a competent vendor, but there is no reason why the incumbent should proceed without any justification. ICANN should take this opportunity to improve domain registry management by clearly laying out what the current and future needs are for a vendor to perform, what service level agreements and penalties should be in place, and finally require cooperation or delegation of domain registration management of top level domains such as .COM across multiple vendors. There is no technical barrier to this requirement to open competition. Secondly, because ICANN is not defining the responsibilities in terms of performance SLAs, penalties, and features, there cannot be a cost associated with a reasonable vendor response to the proposal. This makes every cost arbitrary and unjustified, something ever well run business defines in a contract. Any vendor could squander irresponsibly their management costs, blame it on security, and raise prices the maximum amount because they can like a monopoly. There is no barrier to conducting a vendor selection requirements proposal gathering process, evaluation, and decision made in an open, transparent fashion: this is how the marketplace is defined and won. ICANN should adopt proper accumen in pursuing open competition for services and vendor selection, but this proposal shows little interest in providing the best possible outcome from the marketplace of vendor or the very constituents customers of the .COM TLD. Please consider revising, defining needs, and opening this proposal to marketplace competition and shared responsibility across vendors to promote robustness in cost and reliability. -- Cheers, --Mark mailto:mark@lavi.us [ mobile:+1-650-400-2100 ] http://mlavi.github.io/about/

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I will change my domain to ANY other top level
by Ryan Scarbery Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

And will not look back. -- Ryan Scarbery

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase
by Mark B Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

They're is no valid reason for a price increase. It's already to expensive for something so simple. Leave it alone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposing the price increase
by Openair Infotech Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Respected hom so ever it may concern This is forced and unacceptable decision. We request you to cancel this offer or deal and continue with regular price Thanks Regards Ahmed Hasanfatta

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Icann increase proposal
by LaDon C Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am highly dissatisfied with this price increase proposal. I think it is outrageous to monopolize for selfish reasons, the exploitation of the .com. I surely hope that you reconsider this action immediately. I am sure that it will have catastrophic implications if these unfair practices continue. This appears to be an effort to weed out the small players, and I am not sure that it will be easy to convince others that this is not in the effort of monopolizing industries.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] mailto:comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org?body=
by Admin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I disagree with the proposed changes. This is basically begging for the original .com name to be tainted by pay walls. The current pricing I feel is very fair. if ICann needs more money there is other revenue streams.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Not cool
by Brian Moyers Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

It’s floating dangerously close to being considered extortion. I’d advise against Sent from my iPhone

1 0