- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Amarjargal Batnamjil Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear Sir/Madam, I am international user and writing to voice my opposition to Proposed Amendment 3. Despite there clearly being potential financial gains to be had by raising the registration fee on .com domains, the global DNS registration system should be run primarily as a public concern. It will impact our small business and the millions of small, independent businesses and developers that rely on the system as is to make their livelihood. Please do not adopt this proposal. A.Batnamjil

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] i am opposed
by monica keane Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

i am opposed to increasing charges for .com domain names. Monica Keane monica.keane(a)att.net

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement Customer Comments
by Marlene Smith Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello ICANN, I currently have several business domains, all .COM domains from Namecheap. I am disturbed about the proposed changes to the .COM Registry Agreement. I don't want Verisign to be able to charge me more money each year for my .COM domains. Many of us run small businesses and can't afford to have domain prices skyrocket year after year. Since most of our customers and prospects search for .COM first we have built our businesses around our domain names with the expectation that they will remain reasonable costs. As a business owner, I didn't choose a high cost domain .COM name for a reason. By raising prices each year you will put many people out of business. If they can't afford the .COM name, people won't create online businesses if they have to use another domain. Why is Verisign paying ICANN $20 million dollars over 5 years? Why is that money not being used to keep .COM domain prices LOW for the CUSTOMERS you have now? You will lose customers if prices go up more than 70% over the next decade. Please keep .COM domain prices affordable so that entrepreneurs can stay in business and also create new businesses as they want to without being stopped by a high .COM price. It would also be nice to not have a monopoly created where only a few companies sell these domains as this also hurts all customers current and prospective. https://www.icann.org/public-comments/com-amendment-3-2020-01-03-en/mail_for m Best Regards, Marlene Smith Marketing & Social Media Strategist Email: <mailto:macsmith99@gmail.com> macsmith99(a)gmail.com Let's Be Social: <https://www.linkedin.com/in/marleneasmith/> linkedin_004 <https://www.facebook.com/smith.marlenea> facebook_004 <https://www.instagram.com/MarleneASmith_/> instagram_004 <https://twitter.com/marsmith> twitter_004

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Keep .COM wholesale domain prices sane
by Hubert Daugherty Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, Please keep the .COM domain prices reasonable. The ICANN domain name system initiatives should be structured to keep services reliable, but not at such a high bar that small businesses and individuals cannot afford the cost of a domain name. The agreements with Verisign should be an open agreement which includes limits on price increases, not an unfettered exponential price ramp. Thank you for your service. Hubert Daugherty

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .Com Prices should not be going up
by Samantha Kilford Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am writing in light of recent news that ICANN plans to raise prices of .COM domains. As a small business owner and student who runs her blog with .COM domain, this decision will significantly impact my ability to continue something I am extremely passionate about. I do not believe this should be the case. You will be shutting out small business owners who cannot afford to pay extortionate prices to rely on .COM domains for their brand which is purely unacceptable. I am especially disgusted that the reason this is supposedly happening is due to you accepting a $20 million bribe from Verisign. I am appalled that you would be willing to seemingly rob small businesses, bloggers and other site owners who rely on .COM domains of the ability to share their work, products or stories simply because they cannot afford the prices of .COM domains in the future with your planned rises. I have spent several years building my .COM domain, using my site as an outlet to share my writing as a student and running my site has been incredibly beneficial to my mental health as it allowed me a platform to voice my struggles. Yet, if .COM domain prices rise, I will not be able to afford to do this. People like me cannot afford to spend hundreds - or potentially thousands - on .COM domains especially if what we run doesn't gain profit and is rather for passion. You will push out and alienate so many talented, hardworking people with these price rises and rather than making the internet accessible, you are choosing to ostracize poorer communities. I would urge ICANN not to do this. Your organisation was entrusted with a job and sadly it comes across to me that you are willing to punish small business owners or owners who cannot afford price rises of .COM domains while the organisation profits financially from this deal with Verisign. Yours Sincerely, Samantha

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increases
by Pipe World Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am writing to you in regards to the substantial increase in the .com registry. I understand that price increases are a part of all business dealings, however, the proposed increases go far beyond. I believe most will consider 70% a greed level vs a price increase. Please reconsider the impact of this agreement with Verisign and propose something more practical. Thank you, Kyle Haass 115 Sundance Pkwy, Ste 505 Round Rock, TX 78681 (512) 388-4300

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comments for ICANN
by Doug von Ferber Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I believe the changes you did in secret are devious, making deals behind closed doors and ignoring the opposition against such actions should be illegal. I adamantly believe you should change your policy. Along with clarifying how you will be spending the funds so they are properly spent on domain infrastructure.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment
by Steph Rennick Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To whom it may concern, I am writing to express significant concern about the changes to the contract with Verisign, and in particular the lack of transparency and consultation accompanying these changes, lack of clarity about how the additional funds from Verisign will be spent, as well as the increased cost of .com domains that will result. I hope you will reconsider this approach and strive for greater transparency going forward. Yours sincerely, Dr Steph Rennick

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] This is ridiculous!
by Peter Kaukov Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please do not do this! The .COM TLD is one of the most popular and most accessible TLDs. The price increase will hurt a lot of businesses, including many small ones which are ok with the current prices, but will struggle with price increases. This should not be happening. Leave the internet as it is!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Small Business
by Nicholas Williamson Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

This change is bad for my small business that needs a .com domain to survive. I also have multiple other businesses that are reliant on .com. Please don’t prove out the regular guy Nick W

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Refuses the .COM domain price increase
by Ayman Farrouh Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello. I do really refuse the .COM domain price increase. It's really unfair. Ayman Farrouh

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN & Verisign
by ya shm Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

It’s a pity that corporate greed is the single driver. Never enough?!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Yitzi Franklin Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Not happy with the new changes.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] This could be seen as corrupt
by David Week Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi folks This could be seen as corrupt We often think of corruption as under-the-table payments in brown paper bags. However, corruption is defined more broadly than that. It’s the use of public goods for private gain. “Private gain” includes not-for-profit corporations, which despite being NFP, can gain from certain arrangements. Not all corruption is illegal. This is a matter not of law, but of ethics. ICANN has, since inception, argued for the DNS as a public good as justification for its monopoly control. It’s therefore disturbing to see ICANN entering into an arrangement under which the other party will be given permission to increase prices for the .COM domain, and ICANN will receive $20m from that party. An alternative, more transparent and accountable way for ICANN to raise funds is to increase the fees we, the users, pay ICANN directly. This would allow ICANN to exercise its governance responsibilities without conflict of interest. Best David Week

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop the amendment
by Kohilan Mohanarajan Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I wholeheartedly disagree with the proposed changes the contract that ICANN has with Verisign Inc. and firmly believe that going through with it would be a great disservice to all those who use the .com domain. Sincerely, Kohilan Mohanarajan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I am against any Price Increases for .COM Domains
by V.K. Rajagopalan Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi, I am totally against any contract that you plan to enter into with Verisign that will increase .com prices over any length of time. In other words, I am dead against any sort of increase to the price of .com TLDs. With warm regards, Rajagopalan ================================ V K Rajagopalan Director Paduka Consultants Private Limited Website: https://uupkeep.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increases to .COM domains
by Mohmmad Hanafy Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi, I highly oppose the expected new increases to the .com domains. It may provide you with initial profits at the beginning, but on the long run it will be detrimental to everybody. Best Regards, Mohmmad Hanafy Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM PRICE INCREASE
by MovieManiac Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello I humbly request that this request be stepped down, it is unpredecented and can affect livelihood of many website owners. Thanks for your consideration Ilesanmi

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Price Increases.
by Fadi Haddad Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I hope all is well on your end because Nothing is well on ours ( domainers ) after reading such a news. Talking as a domain investor and branding creative, I’m totally against this action of increasing .COM prices, Even the current price is not justified and if the increase goes to action it will affect the internet badly, You also will not be happy watching the number of domain registrations walking its way down in an ugly picture, Because that’s exactly whats going to happen. Provenance : Courrier<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> pour Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] opposition to Proposed Amendment 3
by Giuseppe Persiani Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Domain price increases
by Ira Hsu Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear ICANN, Please do not allow Verisign to increase wholesale prices to registrars. I can hardly afford to register my own domain plus hosting services to maintain my own website. Allowing increased prices would shut down a lot of small website operators, meaning much of the internet's websites would go down simply because of cost. I also disagree with Verisign being allowed to become a domain registrar, this is an anti-competitive practice. Making these changes that benefit Verisign while recieving a $20 million kick-back is not right for the public and is extremely damaging to website owners like myself. Thank you, Ira

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by icann＠pixelrebel.com Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I have owned my domain for years. My email, my identity is tied to this domain. This agreement will make my personal domain registration too expensive to afford and force me to abandon my online identity and brand. This agreement renders registration (which is already expensive considering how small the overhead is for registrars) unattainable for the general public. Something stinks about this deal. Instead of accepting $20 million from Verisign, why not just raise your icann fee? I'd rather pay your organization directly than enrich verisign which has a monopoly on the .com TLD. Regards, Jamie Evans

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposed
by Thomas Huzij Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I am the owner of multiple .com domains and I am opposed to the proposed amendment. It is not in the public interest to raise the price of .com registry services. The price of .com registry services should remain static at $7.85. Thank you, Thomas Huzij

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] opposition to increase in .com costs
by Lauri Elizabeth Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I would like to register my complaint about the proposed changes to the contract with Verisign, Inc. which will increase the cost of .com domains over the next 10 years. I support price controls on domain registration so we can keep the internet affordable to small businesses. Sincerely, Lauri Elizabeth, LAc Acupuncture & Alexander Technique lauri(a)onkodoclinic.com 503.816.1443 <//503.816.1443> Pronouns: she/her Schedule return visits online at: https://laurielizabeth.as.me/ Review me on social media: www.laurielizabeth.com/reviews This message and any attachments may contain confidential information meant only for the addressee and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or it has been addressed to you in error, please immediately notify me by email and then delete this email and any attachments.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Concern about lack of transparency
by John Nash Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Having been a very early participant in various parts of what became the internet, and a quite early registrant for a domain name (nashinfo.com -- where so many spam msgs arrive that the uottawa email is safer), I am concerned that the amended agreement between ICANN and Verisign could lead to increased prices without any improvement in security or service. I would be much happier if there were more transparency in the projected changes. John C. Nash

1 0