- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] NO
by Max Kaplan Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Without contractually setting a max price per domain name, there is no reason this should be allowed to pass. Shame on you. Max Kaplan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Do not increase the price of .com
by Gilbert Zhou Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi ICANN, The internet belongs to the world. If you raise the price unilaterally, we will unite to sue you. *Thanks~* *Gilbert*

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase
by Túlio Pereira Maia Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I do not agree with the .com domain price increase. Att. Túlio Maia

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I dont support this Amendment
by Reginaldo Braga Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, It is obvious that this attitude is not morally acceptable. I do not agree with this stance and I would not like users and owners to be penalized with this increase in prices. Thanks a Lot. Mu best regards.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Freedom of dotcom
by Hermann Hesse Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (No Subject)
by Jeff Shanholtz Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I'm an individual who owns a personal .com site and don't like the idea of enabling wholesale price increases. The cost of my domain name is high enough as it is! Thank you.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please do not allow the amendment
by KIMBERLY NEWMAN Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I have a hobby website that I do not make money on. I continue the .com because maybe, someday, I will make some money on it. I already pay too much per year to justify keeping it. If the costs go up significantly, I won’t be willing to continue paying for it. I am certain there are a great many people in the same situation. Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Profiteering changes
by Robert McGowan Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I’d like to suggest that forcing up the price of domain registration for nothing other than profit and a dubious $20 million backhander is unethical and anti competitive. Yet again the end user pays for big business profits and the squeezing out of competitors. Robert McGowan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Aaron Horler Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I oppose this proposed amendment. Thanks, Aaron Horler.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] AGAINST .COM PRICE INCREASE
by Stephanie Dilley Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of several .com domain names and I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The price increase will benefit only Verisign. Verisign is the manager of the .COM Registry but should not have control over the price. Please allow ICANN to govern the domain name system. Thanks, Stephanie

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Not happy with Verisign, Inc contract
by Thomas Yang MD Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Wanted to voice my opinion on the matter that would likely lead to increase in domain pricing in the future.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM top-level-domain (TLD). Amendment
by Atif Majeed Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I don’t support ICANN amendment. I strongly condemn the increase. It‘ll only increase the extra burden on small and startup businesses. I request you please not to increase the price of .COM top-level-domain (TLD). Thanks Atif

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Richard Doty Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

A great many small businesses rely on the brand they've created using their .com web sites. To raise the prices significantly puts an undue burden on these businesses with no benefit to them being shown. What benefit do the website owners, or users, gain from this type of increase? This seems to be ill-advised without further notice to the community. Thank you, Rich Doty

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Public comment
by Alexander Ivanov Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

As a low income disabled individual, I rely heavily on my personal .com domains for many aspects of my life. I've had my domains over a decade now and increasing the price 70% would force me to cut some of them. Please reconsider taking Verisign's money in return for increasing prices for the likes of myself. I doubt big businesses are going to care about these price increases, but they are not the ones most impacted by this. Thanks for reading! -Justin

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Silent Price Hikes?
by John Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear ICANN, I am a small online business owner with multiple .com domains, this price hike is very detrimental. It also also allows for unfettered price hikes in the future for all other related domains. How can you allow this to occur without consulting the public? Regards, John

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by wally velishek Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I'm concerned that the proposal will allow many price increases that will hurt small and medium size online marketing and e-commerce businesses financially with too many increases in .com yearly costs. Please rethink this whole proposal. You are only thinking about yourself ( organization) and verisign not "the little guy". As usual the little guy will be hurt if this proposal is allowed to go forward. Thanks Wally Velishek

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] price increases --> accessibility decreases
by Adrian Tanner Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I recently learned about the future price increase allowance structure. 8 out of the next 10 years are allowed to include domain name price increases with no information on why or where the money will go? The internet is about accessibility and this system is actively working against that mission. Please reconsider these increases and proposed structure to keep the internet accessible to both consumers and creators. Adrian

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com Prices Increases Not Acceptable
by Daniel Msanii Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

This hasn't had enough consultations with all the involved parties. It isn't acceptable.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by M Moser Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To ICANN members: As a holder of several .com domains and a citizen of the Internet, I oppose the proposed amendment to the .COM Registry Agreement. I oppose the substance and implementation of the proposed changes, but more than that I am very deeply concerned about the closed-door negotiations that produced the proposal. The Internet has created enormous wealth and opportunity precisely because of its open structure and transparent communal management. From your own mission description: "At the heart of ICANN's policy-making is what is called a "multistakeholder model". This is a community-based consensus-driven approach to policy-making. The idea is that Internet governance should mimic the structure of the Internet itself- borderless and open to all." A consensus-driven approach requires open discussion among ALL stakeholders and unanimous support for major changes. Until you have engaged in an open, honest discussion with all affected parties, including end customers as well as domain-name wholesalers, you cannot claim consensus. This proposal should not go forward. M. Moser

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposed
by Andy Griffin Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

These proposed increases to .com domains will do nothing but put the web further out of reach to common people. The beauty and success of the web is rooted in how accessible and democratic it is for everyone. Regular people need to be able to participate, publish, start businesses and otherwise contribute to the web. Gouging everyday folks flies in the face of everything that the web stands for. Don’t give the web to the rich. Leave it in the hands of people who are also creative, but don’t have the same deep pockets. That would be a huge mistake. Andy Griffin

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com Price Increases
by evan Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

While I understand the financial incentives to raise prices, raising .com prices will destroy the nature of the internet. Right now, someone with a good idea and some knowledge can make something that has millions of users tomorrow with a very little amount of money. Raising the price of .com domains will just make it harder for people to share what they have to say online. I think we all agree that censorship and the internet aren't compatible.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Why
by 100% Random Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

You should not increase the price!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I oppose Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Kerrick Staley Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I oppose Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. I believe that allowing wholesale prices for .com domains to rise 72% over 12 years, which is far more than the rate of inflation and also far more than Verisign's underlying costs of maintaining the registry could possibly increase by, will *dramatically hurt the internet ecosystem*. It will especially hurt small website operators, like myself, and will discourage internet users from creating blogs and personal pages, with the end result of reducing democratization of the internet. Verisign reported a 69.4% operating margin in Q1 2019, so they clearly do not need the extra revenue from this price hike. ICANN has granted a monopoly over .com to Verisign and *ICANN has a duty to every internet user on the planet* to carefully regulate this monopoly to prevent abuse by Verisign. The only conscionable thing to do right now is to *freeze wholesale .com prices* and re-evaluate 5-10 years from now. A policy that allows price increases tracking the rate of inflation (but no higher) may make sense in the future, but right now Verisign is already collecting far more from their .com monopoly than any company would be able to in a competitive market [1]. It's simply not right to allow them to raise prices at this time. - Kerrick [1] For example, Alphabet, a highly successful player in a very high-margin industry, has an operating margin of around 25%. Verisign's operating margin is over 2.75 times that.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendments
by Tony Brown Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please don't make this fee increase. A lot of small folks with domain names will be hurt. Thanks. -- Tony Brown 508-942-4124 tony.w.brown(a)gmail.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price Increase is a Bad Idea
by Todd Weinfield Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

There needs to be a return on investment to justify any price increase - instead merely raising revenue to cover budget shortfalls. What is driving the price increase and how is it justified? Are there other ways to solve this without raising prices?

1 0