- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Fucking thief's
by Amurun Micheal Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

Sad

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Albert Schimmel Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. Albert Schimmel Mettmann, North Rhine-Westphalia Germany

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Fran Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Fran

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I find the upcoming changes in the new deal between Verisign and ICANN is wrong
by fuad Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

Hello, I find the upcoming changes in the new deal between Verisign and ICANN is wrong. Important big decisions like this wich will affect millions of internet users should not be down to only two companies to decide. The internet consumers, both users and the industry as a whole should be listened to in big important deals like this. In many countries there are competion rules that wouldnt allow near monopolies like this being created. Please listen and respect the rest of us users and keep important deals like this transparent and open for inputs from all users of the net. We are one world. Lets work together and. Lets not let greed rule. Regards, Fuad

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] please let people decide how much they are willing to pay maximum for a domain, make a survey and set that as the maximum thx
by Mikula Beutl Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

*Here is how best to reach me:*Skype: mikula_bc WhatsApp & Call +43 660 1585169 FB/Messenger/Twitter: mikulabeutl

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Dot Com Price increase
by Shams ul Haque Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

Hi, I am a registrant of several .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Thanks Shams

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the price increase of COM domain name/反对.com域名注册费涨价
by 356637024 Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

Against the price increase of COM domain name

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN Verisign .COM Scandal
by AdenTosh Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

To Whom it concerns: These proposed actions smack of an abuse of power and misappropriation of funds. Who gives you the right to act in such a unilateral way? We the people pay your salaries. And we the people will act to subvert any organization that does not work to serve the people. Sincerely, AdenTosh

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by jeff beso Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I request you do not alter the price for .com. The barrier of entry needs to remain low, to encourage small business participation. Regards Jeff. Seattle

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I resist the decision.
by Light Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I resist the decision.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Konstantin Sobolev Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Lance Say Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. ICANN you guys, I am shaking my head that you are going alone with Verisign, wait until other amazing entrepreneur came up with a better mouse trap and guess what... just like a dinosaurs; extinct! Lance Sayavong Riverside, California United States -- Best Regards, Lance Sayavong <http://swizz.com> <http://twitter.com/lancesay> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including any attachments, contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged material. The information transmitted is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, patent pending, prior art-works, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by "reply to sender only" message and delete or destroy all electronic and hard copies of the communication, including attachments from any computer.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jacky Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business).  I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. Jacky Ruan shanghai,china

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by JonBot Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

If this happens, I won't be able to keep my domain :((

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Carl Ortiz Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Carl Wahlquist Ortiz Dubai, Dubai United Arab Emirates Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Alick David Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business) and I am also a web designer. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Alick David Lagos, Lagos Nigeria.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3
by Lucia Teixeira Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a registrant of two .com domain names. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate is already far more than justified. Please stop this. Lucia Teixeira

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Paul Weir Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. P. Weir Sydney, New South Wales Australia

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 888AMG Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains and the current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry and it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. P. Andrew Sydney, New South Wales Australia

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop the proposed .Com Price Increase!
by jeff.ducharme＠gmail.com Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

Hello, As governors of the Domain Name System, ICANN must act in the public's best interest and stop the proposed .Com price increase. It is unwarranted and will not result in Verisign "enhancing the security, stability, and resiliency of the Domain Name System" as called for in Amendment 3. I analyze stocks for a living. Verisign is already wildly profitable. They've had ample cash flow available for years to make such enhancements however their executives have instead chosen to use it for stock buy backs. SEC filings show that over the past 5 years Verisign generated $3.5B in cash flow from operations. Of that, they have used over $3.3B to repurchase their stock while spending only $194M in capital expenditures. In 2019 alone they spent $783M buying back their shares. How can ICANN justify any rise in price on .Com registrants in the face of such corporate greed? If you allow Amendment 3 to go forward you will merely further enrich VRSN shareholders at the expense of the general public. Sincerely, Jeff Ducharme

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] domain prices
by Mel Dan Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

Dear ICANN Team, I am writing to share my views on domain prices. I, and my colleagues and everyone else I know in the business are complaining about the rise in domain prices. If this goes on like this, we have no option but to decrease our domains (ie. not renew them). This means bad business for domain registrars, so starts an endless loop of challenges. If we want a better and safe future for the internet, we should make shure that the domain prices do not go up and equally important: that the domain prices are predictable. After all, we are all in the same boat, we need to be more supportive and careful. If this goes on like now, I am considering to change my business and go to another sector where the future is more predictable. Best regards Mel Dan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Daniela Valero Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a .com registrant and am associated with the secondary market. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign and ICANN benefit from the increase. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. The public has a vested interest in reasonably priced domain registrations to foster innovation on the internet and allow the individuals to maintain a presence on the web. -- Daniela Valero

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Zhang Xiuqi Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

"Suppose all the information stored on computers everywhere were linked. Suppose I could program my computer to create a space in which everything could be linked to everything.” — Tim Berners-Lee Not everyone from everywhere is rich. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Xiuqi Zhang

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I do not agree with the increase in prices for .COM.
by System Property Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

The .COM domain zone is a world leader among other domain zones and a global benchmark for the development of modern Internet technologies, and the Internet business as a whole. Recently, however, traditional domain zones have been under tremendous pressure from new domain zones and social networks. Therefore, it is very important for the world to have affordable and reliable .com domains, as this contributes to the development of the modern information business and information technologies. The current registration and renewal prices are reasonable and adequate. Any increase in the prices of .com will cause a decrease in the development of projects in .com and the flow of potential customers to other domain zones or social networks. According to experts, the amount of funds necessary for the reliable functioning of the domain infrastructure (taking into account the number of domains in this domain zone) is about $3 USD per year for one domain. All of the above is the desire of the registry operator to get rich at the expense of domain owners. Removing the restriction on price increases will lead to negative consequences for the world community. Business is good, but only if it is done not to the detriment of the interests of the world community. I ask you to prohibit price increases for .COM, since current prices are sufficient and reasonable, and fully satisfy the needs for ensuring the security and reliability of the domain infrastructure and contribute to the development of the .COM domain zone, and is in the interest of the world community. Best Regards, Nikolay N.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Bukky Yemi Feb. 13, 2020

Feb. 13, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Bukky Lagos, Lagos Nigeria

1 0