- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop / No - this is pure profiteering
by Mark Austin Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Stop / No - this is pure profiteering

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 范世成 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Dear ICANN Registry I am the registrant of the .com domain name and the owner of other domain names. I object to the proposal to raise the price of .COM domain names. Apart from Verisign, no one wants to increase .COM prices. On the contrary, there will be many institutions, organizations, technicians, individuals, etc. who want to reduce prices. As we all know, the current exchange rate of 7.85 US dollars has far exceeded a reasonable price. We pay for services, but the price is not so reasonable. Verisign is just the manager of the .COM Registry-it should have nothing to do with price. ICANN should manage the domain name system in the public interest, so that he can serve everyone, transfer technology, and brighten the future. FancyKing Central, Central and Western District, Hong Kong 发送自 Windows 10 版邮件<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>应用

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry AgreementI use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Chengbo Gong Leshan, Sichuan, China
by Chou X Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] 不合时宜
by 2442145611 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

作为域名二级市场（域名投资市场）最大的受益者，反而为了获得更大的商业利益（.com域涨价），主动引导矛盾实在是不合时宜。域名二级市场客观上确实增加了终端的使用成本，也真是因为此才开放新后缀域用来缓解.com域应用成本过高。.com域名作为目前最成功，也是收入最高的通用顶级域威瑞信（verisign）是有很大贡献。但威瑞信（verisign）应该明白，.com域不是简简单单的商品。它是饮用水、燃气一样的重要社会资源，它深深的影响到现今商业社会。威瑞信（verisign）不但要考虑自身利益，同时还要考虑到社会责任。

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 2464673012 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. ZYT China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price rise for .com - switch to .net instead
by Alistair Page Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

If the price were to increase then I would simply move all my domains over to the ‘.net’ I have for them instead.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 以诺书ENOCH Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. 沈子淇 Shanghai, Shanghai, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by David Lin Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. 林大为 Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China | | David Lin | | 邮箱：david060812(a)126.com | 签名由网易邮箱大师定制

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by M.N Wealth Advisory Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Manoj Kumar Sahu Bhubaneswar, Odisha India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by dyt5AAUI Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Bill Dongyang, Zhejiang, China  

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Benjamin Tay Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Benjamin Singapore, Singapore

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by hello hi Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Dear sir or madam， I strongly against the proposed price increase to .COM domains.Nobody but Verisign want to increase the price of .COM domains. I believe,the current rate of $7.85 has already far more than justified.We know there are a lot of cheaper domains to be chose,but due to the wide spread influence of .COM domains we have no choice but to pay for the unreasonable price of .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest.We believe you can help us to prevent the unreasonable rise of the .COM domains prices. Liu Ruiyang

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] dont
by Prassel Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

you fucking greedy cunts

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by makers2008＠foxmail.com Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Baolin Guo Beijing, Beijing, China makers2008(a)foxmail.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment on pricing
by Gunther Stammwitz Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Please respect the economies of scale effect. Prices must know only one direction: downwards. Regards Gunther

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Anunt Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of over 100 .com domain names. I support the proposed price increase which allows for a 31% price increase through 2024. Please increase the price. This price increase only affects domainers with 1000’s of domains and they probably make up less than 20% of domains registered. The majority of dot com owners own less than 100 domains and this small price increase will not affect them. So please go ahead and increase the price. Thank you. Anunt Patel Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ramón Rautenstrauch ＠NTCValencia Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of several .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Instead of increasing the price there should be a discussion to reduce it. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Ramón L'Eliana, Valencia Spain De conformidad con el reglamento (UE) 2016/679 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 27 de abril de 2016, relativo a la protección de las personas físicas en lo que respecta al tratamiento de datos personales y a la libre circulación de estos datos y por el que se deroga la Directiva 95/46/CE (Reglamento general de protección de datos o RGPD), le recordamos que sus datos son objeto de tratamiento por parte de Soluciones Innovadoras Internet SL. Estos datos son gestionados con la finalidad de informar y comunicar todo aquello relativo a la prestación de nuestros servicios profesionales y actividades. Recibes este correo porque nos has facilitado y/o cedido voluntariamente tu dirección electrónica. No obstante, puedes ejercer tus derechos de acceso, rectificación, limitación, supresión, portabilidad y oposición al tratamiento de sus datos enviando un email a info(a)apasionados.es (poniendo en el asunto Ejercicio de derechos" y adjuntando una copia de su DNI). Dispone también del derecho a presentar una reclamación ante una autoridad de control. Recuerda que todos tus datos serán tratados con la máxima confidencialidad y conforme al RGPD, y la Ley 34/2002 de Servicios de la sociedad de la información y de comercio electrónico (LSSI-CE). Para más información, consulte nuestra <https://apasionados.es/avisolegal.htm#politica-de-privacidad> política de privacidad.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 阳光之海Offical Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. wenkuo lu Langfang, Hebei, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price Hike
by ETERNAL RECORDS Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Dear ICANN, please don't hike the price for domain so that everyone can gain access to internet community. Please we all are not that much wealthy, please look at us also. Please take your this step back. Thank you so much

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I am against this price increase
by asadnawaz4＠yahoo.com Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mark Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Companies Newsletters Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Make statistics of domains with other extensions, which have higher prices than DOT COMS to find out if they became popular at all. Domains are supposed to reach private people and must not remain in hands of commercial companies. That does not happen if private parties are to pay higher prices. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Mukesh Joshi Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia Germany

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I do not want the price to go up
by Cody C Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by yecheng zhu Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Dear sir/madam, I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Yours faithfully Penglaishan Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 染念 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. 染念 undefined, Zhejiang, China

1 0