- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Abdy Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am associated with the secondary market in domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Wang Zhe Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 하 늘 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Lee

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by c2a3e6c5cc873＠cuixiangmi.com Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. AWD.CO SUQIAN, JIANGSU, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Oliver Taylor Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am associated with a registry. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Oliver Taylor London, England

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 盧威廷 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Lu Wei Tin TaiWan, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Adair Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Mr.Li Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jagannath Jag Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Thank you, Jagan Jag 240 State Street Suite 2255 Albany, NY 12220 www.Spansoft.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 蓝哆 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. landuo Kaifeng, Henan, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] We are opposed to rising prices
by m n Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Hi . This is a very bad decision. very bad . And to the detriment of everyone. If you do not cancel this decision we will no longer register new domains and will not renew the domains. We are against this irrational decision. We oppose raising the price of the domain. You need to make the domain cheaper than the current price so that everyone can use it

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 小沨 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. walter Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Sun Lei Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Sun L. Wuxi, Jiangsu, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] comments
by m n Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Hi . This is a very bad decision. very bad . And to the detriment of everyone. If you do not cancel this decision we will no longer register new domains and will not renew the domains. We are against this irrational decision. We oppose raising the price of the domain. You need to make the domain cheaper than the current price so that everyone can use it

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ante Dražić Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Ante Dražić Zagreb, City of Zagreb Croatia Sent from my Huawei Mobile

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by lanemi Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. qin Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by justinzxzf Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. zhang lei Beijing, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by AA Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am associated with the secondary market in domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Smith.W.deliv Ashburn, Virginia, United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by AA Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am associated with the secondary market in domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Smith.W.deliv Ashburn, Virginia, United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Dawei Shang Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Dawei

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment
by mertz3hack＠gmail.com Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

By raising prices, the barrier to entry also rises which can crush the "American dream" of many people. Raising barriers to entry can stifle innovation. Many entrepreneurs start young when they don't have access to extra money. A domain name provider service is not changing so why should the price go up?

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 青山 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. qs undefined, Jiangxi, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement.
by 二宝 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. LiuMing Benxi, Liaoning, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by FancyKing Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Dear ICANN Registry I am the registrant of the .com domain name and the owner of other domain names. I object to the proposal to raise the price of .COM domain names. Apart from Verisign, no one wants to increase .COM prices. On the contrary, there will be many institutions, organizations, technicians, individuals, etc. who want to reduce prices. As we all know, the current exchange rate of 7.85 US dollars has far exceeded a reasonable price. We pay for services, but the price is not so reasonable. Verisign is just the manager of the .COM Registry-it should have nothing to do with price. ICANN should manage the domain name system in the public interest, so that he can serve everyone, transfer technology, and brighten the future. FancyKing Central, Central and Western District, Hong Kong

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 胡思乱想 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. LongRuofei Chengdu, Sichuan, China _______________________________  

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by RachelStein ElaineLynch Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Hello, I am a registrant of a .com domain name.I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains.Reasons are listed as follows. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN should govern the domain name system in the public interest. Thanks. Sincerely, Eric L. Beijing, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Edison Jwa Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. Jwa Khabarovsk, Khabarovsk, Russia

1 0