- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Edison Jwa Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Edison Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mr. Khalili - IT Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Hossein Khalili Qom, Qom Iran

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 3lvdQ ZnVja Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Takahiro YOSHIDA Tokyo, Japan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 18141901238＠189.cn Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 姜宇 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. ChiangYu China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by info＠gay.run Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. 唐立春 Chengdu, Sichuan, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Lei Zixian Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Lei Chongqing, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 皮皮虾 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. PPXWO ChengDu, Sichuan, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 胡女士 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry �C it has no business dictating the price. hu xiujun Zhengzhou, Henan, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 2301553244 Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Wang Hongxiao Foshan, Guangdong, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Wason Liu Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Wason Liu Mianyang,Sichuan,China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Adrian McKeown Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. A McKeown Auckland, Auckland New Zealand

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Strongly Oppose move to increase .COM prices
by XLNC News Network Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

To all concerned, I would like to register my strong opposition to any increase in .COM prices. The move is selfish and disguised attempt to fleece the end customers. It will only benefit Verisign and increase its revenues. Please refrain from this move. Thanks, Team XLNC New Delhi, India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by chen Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than the cost of their job: manage the .COM Registry. They have no reason to increase the price. Jack Chen Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jason Dolman Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. JASON DOLMAN Oshawa, Ontario Canada

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by tracey sclater Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am associated with the secondary market in domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. tracey sclater kinka beach . queensland. australia Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by hi＠nai.ba Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by jerel brandt Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. Jerel Brandt Oroville, California United States Thank

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Dont Increase rate .com domain
by Aamir Kadral Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Burden to small business
by jarrod.smith＠gmail.com Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a small/individual business who has registered a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The proposed annual increases are more than double the rate of inflation and income increases. Therefore the proposed rate increases are opportunistic and motived by something other than market forces. If Verisign cannot maintain .COM rates that follow in lockstep with the rest of the economy, provision of these services should be put out for bid so that competition can work for the consumer. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. . This proposal is in Verisign's interest and contrary to the public interest. Sincerely, Jarrod Smith

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please
by William Ojeda Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Nooooooo Please

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by james greene Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Price increases make it hard for people manage expenses when you own more than one domain. Was 2 dollars now 20+. Ridiculous James Greene Weldona Colorado Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment on proposed amendment 3 to .com registry agreement
by Patrick - PASU Holdings LLC Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

Estimates say that the cost to manage the .com domain registry does not exceed $3.50 per domain, per year, and the number might really be significantly lower. Furthermore, other qualified registrars/managers have proven the ability to operate other domain registries for less than $1.00 per year. Based on this information, there does not seem to be any legitimate reason to raise .com domain rates to the proposed levels when the price is already $7.85 per domain. If Verasign and ICANN can articulate a valid and evidence-based reason for needing to raise the price of each .com domain, then I could understand the request. HOWEVER, I read the proposed amendment and the only reasons listed for raising the rates are (1) imposition of any new Consensus Policy, or (2) documented extraordinary expense resulting from an attack or threat of attack on the security/stability of DNS. I have not seen any explanation of what these would cost and how that would compare to the proposed annual increase. However, based on Verasign's estimate of 144 million .com domain names currently registered, we know factually that just in the first 7% annual increase, Verasign would earn an additional $79.2 million. If an increase in price is inevitable, I ask that ICANN consider a much lower increase, such as 10 cents ($0.10) per year over the next four years. Thank you. Patrick Sullivan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Chin-kuo Ho Feb. 9, 2020

Feb. 9, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. he jin guo Taiyuan, Shanxi China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by dobby2112` Feb. 8, 2020

Feb. 8, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Brian San Jose, California United States

1 0