- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Newslite Media Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am an entertainer (I massively work in my entertainment Blog Portal with .com Domain) I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already hugely more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Collins Udochukwu Newslitemedia, Imo State Nigeria

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] dont increase the .com domain prices
by Ahmad Karim Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Increasing the .com domain price increase means that only elite will be able to launch a .com website and not any regular person. Please dont increase the .com domain prices. Thank you!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Domain price increases
by Jeff Teegarden Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am hereby registering my opposition to the proposed changes regarding .com management, and insisting on fair retention of price controls and a more open “playing field.” The proposals seem to indicate an increased monopolization and control between two entities only: ICANN and Verisign, which is unacceptable and dangerous for the long-term health and operation of the Internet. Sincerely, Jeff Teegarden. Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by jane obasi Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. If the price increases, some domainers may be left stranded and depressed.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com increases
by Steena Marie Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom it May Concern, Hello ICANN! I’m writing as a consumer and avid user of domain name services and ownership online with concern over the recent changes in the .com domain pricing structures and allowable increases that have happened without consultation of your community or internet users. It is my hope that you will both consider the impact of this decision on the accessibility and economical value of the use of the internet that your choice will have and ask that future efforts be made to include users and the ICANN community. Thank you, Steena Marie

1 0

Re: [Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by James Peinkofer Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I’d like to comment on the amendment that you are proposing to the .com registry. I understand that such a change is a significant financial benefit to your agency, but I wonder if you have taken into consideration the trickle-down effect that it will have to users of services, such as Namecheap, who buy domain names at a very affordable price. Such a rate hike will make it more of a financial burden to those of us who purchase many domains each year to do our business. Please reconsider moving this amendment forward, as it negatively effects those of us in the mainstream. Thank you – James Peinkofer Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM registry agreement
by Contrese M Jenkins Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom it May Concern, Being an event planner and designer one our responsibilities is to negotiate contracts on behalf of my clients, and in doing so, I give my clients the comfort in knowing I am negotiating these contracts for them with their best interest and protection to the best of my ability. In negotiating said contracts, it’s my job to make sure that vendors not only don’t take advantage of my clients (especially if some contracts were already signed before I was hired) but also to make sure vendors adhere to all that has been agreed upon by both parties, so there is no way any “side deals” or “surprises” come up before, during or after my client’s event. In contract law, not adhering to all that is written therein constitutes a breach of contract, and if ICANN has a contract that states they are not able to increase prices until a certain time, then it would behoove them to adhere to that contract and make any all adjustments at the time when a new contract is needed to be negotiated. Contrese M Jenkins Certified Event Designer & Planner Special Events by Contrese

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Regarding Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Nodoka Hanamura Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am contacting the ICANN pertaining to Amendment 3 of the .COM Registry Agreement betwixt the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and American Domain Registrar and Internet services provider Verisign Incorporated. As the operator of a .com domain, especially one on a extremely low budget, I heavily protest the changes to the Wholesale Price limitations issued in Section 1, Subsection "Alignment with Amendment 35 of the Cooperative Agreement". Both people in my situation (limited financial ability) and those in nations with extremely disproportionate currency worth to the United States (Where Verisign is located) will be heavily affected by this change, to the point where domain ownership could become difficult to afford, and be a nuisance for others. I and others implore the ICANN to nullify the alignment with Amendment 35, and protect the interests of internet users ergo. "Nodoka Hanamura" Webmaster, nodo.kahanamura.com System Administrator, neocinci.bbs.io Sent via Migadu.com, world's easiest email hosting

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No to .COM price hikes!
by KSlaughter33 Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

These changes will have a significant impact on the Internet for years to come, and only ICANN and Verisign have participated in this decision, which is unfair to say the least, and nefarious collusion to say the worst. ICANN is supposed to help the industry, not harm it. Please don’t do this. KSlaughter

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] public comment on Verisign agreement
by Risa Weaver-Enion Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Keep .com domain name pricing the way it is! Stop trying to squeeze the little people to line your own pockets. Stop being opaque in your business dealings. Stop entering into corrupt deals with shady conglomerates. Act in the public interest like you’re supposed to. Best regards, Risa Weaver-Enion Owner & Chief Wedding Planner Risa James Events www.risajamesevents.com <http://www.risajamesevents.com/> 916-287-3455

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Verisign & .COM
by Tanner Meade Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello ICANN, I have several .COM domains and am directly affected by ICANN and the decisions made by the domain companies in this area. After doing some research, I came to the knowledge that there was a recent agreement made between Verisign and ICANN that has a big impact on the industry. Specifically how Verisign can now increase the prices dramatically year over year, how Verisign can operate as their own registrar, and possibly act as a reseller through another registrar. This is directly affecting small businesses because it will cause a significant more friction and make it harder for your main market to continue to innovate. I believe it is really important that ICANN involve more of the market and community on these types of decisions. — Tanner Meade

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase
by Justin Miller Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified and the average price of managing the infrastructure must certainly be diminishing over time. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has ABSOLUTELY no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public - not corporate greed or profit. Please stop this blatant cash grab. Justin Miller Los Angeles, California

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposing the proposed price increase to .COM domains.
by m. e. hanson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please note - I am against the proposed increase to .COM domains. I'm the owner of domain names for both, my non-profit that supports youth entrepreneurs in South Los Angeles, and domain names for my own small for-profit business. Raising the fees will become an unnecessary burden on my business and those of emerging young business owners who already are challenged to succeed per the underserved areas in which they live.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Rakalso Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Raka Wibisono Jakarta, Jakarta Indonesia

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Daniel Hofmann Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, As a tech entrepreneur and small business owner, running a business is hard enough. Raising costs on top level domains will not only hurt my business, but will have a chilling effect on new tech entrepreneurs starting a new business from their bedroom. Also, only allowing VeriSign as a sole partner in this is wrong. Private companies should have no direct influence like this, on our DNS and WWW, which is an open and public system, for the common good of humanity. Sincerely, Daniel Hofmann Founder/Managing Director Parts Square LLC <https://square.parts/> https://square.parts <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danhofmann> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danhofmann> View My Profile m: 609-203-7328 | e: <mailto:dan@square.parts> dan(a)square.parts "This communication is confidential and intended only for the addressee." If you are not the intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, or distribute this message to anyone else; any such actions may be unlawful. This material is owned by the above undersigned and if you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender of the message to inform him or her of the error. Regular Internet e-mail is not secure. We ask that you do not send personal or company information of a sensitive or confidential nature through unsecured e-mail." P Please consider the environmental impact before printing this document. CCopyright Parts Square LLC 2020. All rights reserved.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Gordon Ijelu Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I strongly feel ICANN and Verisign should contact the domain managers like Namecheap for their opinions and agreement to any fee increment because any increases will be passed on to .com owners and this will be bad for business. I do not support any increases at this time. GIJELUMD.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Andrew Stanley Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of several .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Andrew Stanley Kansas City, Missouri United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Matthew Chatfield Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of many .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains unless there can be demonstrated a clear benefit to users from doing so. I have seen no such demonstration. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Matthew Chatfield Ryde, PO33 1LU

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Elsa Lee Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has no business dictating price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Elsa Lee Washington DC

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Tyler Salari Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Tyler Salari Salt Lake City , Utah, United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed increases
by Alannah Blanchard Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom it May Concern: My understanding is that .com domain names costs may increase beyond what is reasonable and good business practices. The proposed increase is unacceptable! It would be a huge pain to get a new domain name but I'd rather do that than be bullied. It would hurt so many to raise the prices so much. So much money is already being made on a virtual commodity, being .coms. What justification is there other than excessive greed? Where is this extra money going? Please, do not allow this to happen. Choose the high road. Be proud of your contribution to the internet as a whole and what it does for mankind. Don't make it unaccessable for those venues of communication, business, blogs, culture, etc. to function. Sincerely, Alannah Blanchard

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Unjustified Price Increase
by Seb lear Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I object to the proposal that allows above market rate price increases with no transparency on how the funds are to be directed. Increasing prices in-line with inflation is perfectly understandable but this proposal is completely unreasonable

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Why are you rising .com price?
by Pablo Andrés Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Looks like you are in your way to monopolize domain registration. I completely oppose the .com price increment.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] mailto:comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org?body=
by bottlecap＠protonmail.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This amendment is terrible and it only benefits Verisign. The internet is a haven of cheap innovation and spreading of information. By increasing the price of the most recognized TLD, you are hindering innovation. Other TLDs are not nearly as recognizable and many people refuse to trust going to websites on less recognized TLDs. When I think of who this price increase impacts, I think of students, technology enthuiasts, small businesses, nonprofits, and hobby programmers. This increase will just force those to move away from .com and move to other less recognized and less respected TLDs. Sent from ProtonMail mobile

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Craig de Fasselle Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Most of our clients are VERY small businesses and nonprofits and are not supportive of price increases. As I handle renewals for them and usually pay for them and wait for reimbursement, a price increase is a hardship. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign wants increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Craig de Fasselle Springboro

1 0