- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No price raise on com domains
by Sebastian Enger Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello sir or madam, We are a small sized .com software company with international ambitions. We need stable prices for the next dot com boom. Please keep the price of current dot come zones. With warm regards, Sebastian Enger WWW.ARTIKELSCHREIBER.COM WWW.UNAIQUE.COM

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against ICANN contract with Verisign
by TKNui Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Sir, I have been informed that you have made the decision to make very significant changes to the contract that you have with Verisign, operating the TDL .COM. These changes were made without any prior information and any consultation with the outsourcing community of your ICANN organization, or the Internet community in general. We are rising to your decision to give Verisign a great deal of freedom to dispose of the granting of .COm names and to establish pricing at its sole discretion. This will necessarily harm our business and risk bankruptcy for those who have more than one .COM domain name. I would be grateful if you could review your decision and take into account the entire community working on the development of an Internet accessible to all. You are the guarantor of the freedom of enterprise on the web so we ask you to take into account the demands of all in favor of controlling the market for domain names outside the control of all private organizations without morality. Thank you for your concern and receive the expression of our respect. Guillaume Taimana Member of namecheap.com ----- TKNui O Tahuŋa Korero Nui E tu ki ruŋa Tahua Manu, maŋaro vai Punau tāmarū no te toa, heruri Tama Nui ko vai te utu ki One Kura, mātakutaku e kaore e maraŋai Takahī te toa ki ruŋa ki te ata reva, poroporo e poro ki te marama a toki ki te mārako e te tikahaŋa kaito no te uki hou.. a tu, a hipa, kākaro!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Objection on Increase in Domain Prices
by Usman Khan Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

ICANN as an organization must consider their costumer’s interests first. Business is actually what we do for our mutual profits and gains. As a personal owner of a dot Com domain I'd like to voice my opposition to the considered price rise. Technology is getting cheaper and we should not have to pay more because it is managed by a monopoly. Regards, Usman Khan CISCOM, Pakistan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please Don’t Raise the Price
by Amy Parizo Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please do not raise the price for using the .com domain for my business URL. I’m a small business owner (1 person) but I need the .com the run my business. I also feel it was pretty sneaky to have decisions made behind close doors. Please don’t hurt the small business owner! Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] COM amendemnt opposition
by Seth Troisi Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I oppose Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. Allowing wholesale prices for .com domains to rise 72% over 12 years, is far more than the rate of inflation and also far more than Verisign's costs of maintaining the registry could possibly increase by. I believe this will dramatically hurt the internet ecosystem. It will especially hurt small website operators, like myself (three .com + a handful of redirects), and will discourage internet users from creating blogs and personal pages, with the end result of reducing democratization of the internet. Verisign reported a 69.4% operating margin in Q1 2019, so they clearly do not need the extra revenue from this price hike. ICANN has granted a monopoly over .com to Verisign and ICANN has a duty to every internet user on the planet to carefully regulate this monopoly to prevent abuse by Verisign.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Iroka Chimaobi Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please don't increasesm the fee for the sake of new businesses

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Rohan Dvivedi Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I do not like this move

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Price Increase
by Reza Kuweiti Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I am against of increasing price on the .COM. I do not support ICANN doing this. Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM PRICE INCREASE
by Karen White Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To whom it may concern: I strongly oppose this increase. I'm a disabled senior on a fixed low income. I've retained a .COM Domain for years, even though I no longer am able to advertise or make a profit any longer, because I can STILL afford the cost of the Domain.However, if the price of MY domain "increases very much", like other "very small" businesses, that additional cost would FORCE ME (and others) to DROP the Domain entirely, (or at least change it for some people...!?!) If the idea is to have FEWER DOMAINS, then "this increase" will cause this to happen!! Otherwise, I think those trying to "get MORE money from .COM Domain owners" might want to RE-THINK THIS STRATEGY!! Sincerely,Karen White Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please no
by Matthew Marney Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please no

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] By raising the prices, we do not create a world...
by Grant Daniel Reed Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

…we create worlds that divide the haves and have nots. Part of the power of the internet, YouTube, FB and other sites is there accessibility. Those willing to take entrepreneurial risks have enough expenses to make a business profitable. This would only hinder further industry and improvements made throughout the world. Grant Reed

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Penalizing small businesses
by Beth Ashmore Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

This change will penalize small businesses and entrepreneurs. Please reject this change. It isn’t worth it.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by John Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi, I am against the proposed price increases to .com domain names as I feel this will negatively impact individuals and emerging or small businesses, tipping the (once much more level) playing field towards established and larger entities and corporations (for whom such price increases are insignificant and helpfully serve to remove low level and first mover competition for them). This is quite sad since the web once provided an historically unusual diversity and equality of opportunity that I considered a significant aspect of its underlying spirit (along with openness, freedom of speech/ideas, and co-operation). Something that slips away from us as it becomes increasingly centralised and under control of large commercial quasi-monopolies. I was under the impression that ICANN governed the domain name system in the public interest, and had become a central piece of the modern internet largely by being perceived as a well governed non-profit organization. It seems that by allowing the increase of prices beyond that which is necessary to fulfil the provision of .com, it will ultimately lose ICANN good will (or I should say a more good will, since people are still smarting from the way .org was managed recently). Amongst the more tech savvy there are already alternative decentralised systems emerging, so I guess there is that. It would seem unlikely that they will gain traction and overtake the current centralised and increasingly commercialised approaches, but then again - many said that about the free software movement and open source and look how that turned out online. The current rate of $7.85 already appears more than justified since other registries claim they can offer the same service for much less, estimating the management of the registry to cost between $2.50 to $2.90 per domain name per year. As processing power, storage and bandwidth increases dramatically and becomes cheaper with the passing years, prices for providing the service appear to be heading in the other direction at some pace. This seems contrary to what I would expect to happen in what is purported to be a capitalist system. It leads one to wonder why that is the case. Perhaps decentralisation and deregulation, the removal of ICANNs non-profit status, and increased competition in service provision is on the horizon. Or for an emerging alternative to take it's place. ICANNs recent handling of the .org domain and this recent .com proposal appears to be providing some fuel to the fire in the bellies of those trying to push in that direction. It will be interesting to see how things work out in the long run. Best wishes John Barker

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Aaron Alpert Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear ICANN, As a small business owner and owner of nirkoda.com, I request that you reject the proposed amendment 3 to the .com registry agreement. These domains are the lifeblood of business and the first gateway that customers discover. ICANN does great work as a nonprofit, and I am happy to pay the 18 cents fee every year. I would even be happy to pay a larger fee to support ICANN. However, the proposed amendment simply increases Verisign's profits, without guaranteeing any improvement for business owners who rely on .com domains. Please reject this proposal that benefits Verisign at the expense of millions of customers. Thank you, Aaron Alpert Israeli folk dance teacher and webmaster -- Aaron Alpert Apple, Inc., Mechanical Engineer Stanford University, M.S. 2017 UC Berkeley, B.S. 2010, M.S. 2011 818-687-9717

1 0

Re: [Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Wayne Davis Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

As a developer of websites since 1997, I wish to strongly protest the proposed price increases for .com domains and permitting Version to both operate as a domain registrar while also operating the .com registry. I have watched over these many years as costs have increased, and continued price increases have already been a factor in losing numerous clients and the shuttering of their websites. While 17 .com domains may seem small to you, these proposed substantial cost increases will serve to more of my clients reasons to use alternatives such as a Facebook page for their online presence, and drop their websites (and the associated domain registration fees) altogether. Wayne Davis TYPExpress 100 S. Eighth Ave. Winterset, Iowa 50273 (515) 462-1874 wdavis(a)typexpress.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN contract with Verisign, Inc.
by Rachel Aronson Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Raising prices for .com domain names is unnecessary, unless you are trying to serve only the wealthy. The lack of transparency in this new contract with Verisign Inc. is a very bad-faith play. Please honor the spirit in which the internet was created and retain its accessibility to all. I oppose the agreement. Please reconsider the proposal for something more fair and just.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Vivek Kartha Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

We are against the price hike in .com domains

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Do not increase prices for .com
by Brian Clapp Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

If you do I will have to get rid of many of my domains

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price increases
by Jaimyn Mayer Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To whom it may concern, I believe an accessible and open internet is absolutely necessary in this current day and age. I'm incredibly disappointed that the recent .COM amendment 3 was discussed behind closed doors and will drastically increase prices for many years to come. This reduces the ability for people without as many resources as bigger corporations, such as small businesses, startups, and individuals to create their presence on the web. Please reconsider this. *Warm regards, Jaimyn Mayer*

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Usman Hussain Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi, This is simply unacceptable for all the right reasons. Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com Pricing
by Logan Matic Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

This is a terrible idea it would cause so many people to just ditch .com domains.... If this happens I will personally not be using any .com domains anymore...

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Changes to ICANN Verisign contract terms - I object
by David J Patterson Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

As a registrant of a .com domain, I have been made aware of a change in the agreement between ICANN and Verisign, a change that will allow for the increase in the costs to domain registrants. I have not be advised of the benefits I will receive from nthis change. Until such time as ICANN provides an explanation, this would appear to be a profiteering price hike, and I object to this. I will change my view if I am convinced that I will receive tangible benefits from the changes. Thankyou David Patterson for mapleferryman.com Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I am against the proposed increase of .com domain prices
by Ashwin R S Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello ICANN, I am against the proposed increase of .com domain prices. -- Thanks, Ashwin

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by don＠ethos.nz Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear ICANN, I am informed that you are doing a deal with Verisign allowing a succession of annual registration price increases in exchange for a 20 million funds injection. This deal will also allow Verisign to compete as a public domain registrar. Naturally, as a registrant I opposed unreasonable price increases. It is reported that this agreement could double the cost of domain registration over the next 10 years. I understand there are around 100 million registered .COM domains. The current ICANN levy is about 18 cents. If ICANN needs to increase funding why wouldn't you increase the levy by 5 cents. That will increase your annual income by more than 5 million. The cost to Verisign of running the .COM registry bears little relation to the number of domains registered. If anything domain registration costs should be reducing as scale amortizes fixed costs. Why would ICANN be taking money from Verisign in exchange for ratifying an agreement to let Verisign expand and profiteer? Are there conflicts of interest? Do ICANN Board Members, or associates, hold stock or options in Verisign? Please DO NOT SELL OUT the public of the world to greedy corporate interests. I would be interested to look more deeply into the ICANN board challenges and considerations. Could you please send me links to Board and Committee minutes where the Verisign agreement is discussed. Could you please send me costings and projections that have been formulated relating to this proposed agreement. Thank you for your work, Kind regards, Don Anderson

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN .com rate increases proposal
by Linda Patrick Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi ICANN, I strongly oppose your 70% rate increases proposed over the next 10 years for .com domain names. I cannot understand why the HUGH rate increases. It makes no sense to me. It sounds more like greed on the part of ICANN. Also why the rate hike meetings in secret. This is after all the public internet, not some secret. Thank you, Linda Patrick *Linda Patrick* lpatrick99(a)gmail.com Create your own email signature <https://www.wisestamp.com/signature-in-email/?utm_source=promotion&utm_medi…>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I object.
by Wendy Dent Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I object to the proposed changes. This to the company and Verisign’s benefit, and will restrict affordable access to .com domains. The 20 million payment from Verisign to Icann smacks of bribery. Forgive typos. Sent from my cell phone.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Wishgranted.com Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Now I see why Obama gave you this boon, so you ICANN can wield unbridled power, such as is already evident, e,g, you made these proposed changes in secret, you did not consulting or incorporate the opportunity of feedback from the ICANN community or Internet users in general Verisign apparently has agreed to pay ICANN an extra $20 million dollars during the course of five years to supporI CANN's DNS system apparently without knowing in advance what that actually entails, nor is ther clarity as to who and how the extra $$ money is spent? REALLY? And you expect us to go along with this without objection by the public and regulatory bodies? GO ahead, pull the trigger, I for one will then lead the charge of mass migration to alternates like: https://unstoppabledomains.com/ PS wishgranted.com was registered in 1997 and I personally KNOW EVERYONE IN THIS SPACE, AND MY TAKE IS YOU ARE MAKING A BIG MISTAKE WITH THIS MOVE IF YOU GO FORWARD WITH THIS CLADESTINE B.S. E.V. GOETSCH

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] doesn´look fair
by MARTIN TAVARES MASTRANGELO Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I´m against prices increase for .com domains it should be discussed with users -- Martin T. Mastrangelo 24 - 988.474747

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN contract
by mark rigby Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi I am a small business owner, I have several small sites that each make up a small wage to provide for my family. Any large increases in fees for domains will kill my business. Surely any increase on such a scale must be moderated by a governing body as it affects a global community. A degree of accountability and responsibility must be shown to such a high volume of affected people. Regards Mark Rigby

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com TLD
by james palmisano Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I received an email from namecheap regarding the price of .com TLDs. I understand that there is a suggestion proposed that potentially increase the price of .com domains. If you could please point me to the pro and cons of this suggestion that would be greatly appreciated. Generally speaking I am not for actions which would increase the amount being paid for services already reserved. Hope this message helps characterize my feelings and if there are any additional questions please let me know. Best Regards James

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Fee increase
by Floyd Taub, MD Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Fees for initial registration of URLs should remain unchanged. To meet documented increases in costs fees for active sites might be increased, but only as needed to cover documented increased costs. Best, Floyd Floyd Taub, M.D. 303 249-9174 Fitzsimmons Bioscience Center Colorado Science and Technology Park 12635 E. Montview Blvd., Suite 100G Aurora, CO 80045

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I'm very unhappy with your decision on this.
by The Imperial OPA Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

When I think of the internet I think of you. The governing body that keeps our Internet working well. Think of you as an impartial third party keeping things Affordable for everybody and open and fair. However today when I read about this b*******. Closed-door meetings and up to 70% increases on.com names Oh, and you all receiving money with No real spending plan for it. . It seems like a money grab on your part. This is unacceptable. Your actions in this front are not in line with what the internet should be. They have greed that underlies them. They have an outcome that is not for an open internet, but for a close internet for the rich and mighty. I strongly urge you not to pursue this course of action. But rather pursue a course of action for a more affordable open internet. That can help bring the world together and not drive them apart. Again, I am against this course of action you are taking.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN PRICE
by Zakaria chafii Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello there, I'am writing you today to protest the proposed price increase to .COM domains. As a company, Verisign already enjoys the highest profit margins so The company maintains a monopoly on the .COM registry, and incredulously, is proposing a price increase as its costs of operation are actually going *down!* (This contention is bolstered by the many other registrars who maintain that, given an opportunity, they can run the .COM registry at much lower costs.) As if to add insult to injury, this is a company that is supposed to be operating in the public interest. All parties would agree, with the possible exception of Verisign themselves, that the burden of a .COM price increase at this time on individuals and small business would most decidedly NOT be in their best interests. For all the reasons noted above, I urge that the proposed amendment be rejected. Sincerely

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I do not agree with the price hike
by Scott Walton Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Best Regards, Scott Walton (214)497-2606 Sent from my iPhone.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don’t do it
by camron watts Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Don’t make the change please

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by admin＠asunhost.com Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Valerie Martinelli Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am writing in opposition of these prices increases. As a small business owner, I strongly oppose this measure because it will make the cost of running a small business consistently burdensome. Especially since most of us operate in an online marketplace, which makes owning a website mandatory and not optional or a luxury. I also oppose that this move was done in secrecy, seeking no public input because it would have likely indicated pushback from then. I am also strongly cynical that additional or future changes won't be made again in the future in secrecy. This decision will significantly impact the internet for years to come and only ICANN and Verisign were in on it. The internet is public domain and changes that affect that public domain should not be made in secrecy. I hope this measure does not go forward. Best regards, Valerie [image: facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/AskVMC/> [image: twitter] <https://twitter.com/askvmc> [image: linkedin] <https://www.linkedin.com/in/askvmc/> [image: instagram] <https://www.instagram.com/askvmc/> Valerie Martinelli, MPA Career & Leadership Expert Valerie Martinelli Consulting, LLC 203-805-8075 Valerie(a)askvmc.com https://www.askvmc.com/ Watch VMC's Masterclass Now! <http://bit.ly/SuccessWithVMC> <https://www.hubspot.com/email-signature-generator?utm_source=create-signatu…>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3
by I Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I don't want to take up too much of your time as I'm sure you got a lot of messages. All I will say is that the internet backbone of a free and connected world and I think we should be doing everything we can to make it accessible to all people. If you need money, a small tax from companies, ISPs or countries would be just as effective at raising capital without disadvantaging entrepreneurs and small businesses. Thank you for all that you do and for your consideration. Yours, Liam

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please keep .com prices accesible
by Andres Vargas Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please keep .com prices accesible

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] increasing .COM prices will harm innovation
by G Tardy | PilierPublic Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear Sir or Madam, The proposed changes to the contract between ICAAN and Verisign, where Verisign could increase the cost of .COM domains by 7% per year for 4 years out of 6, would result in a dramatic increase of the costs borne by small companies and individuals alike : +100% every 15 years. There is no good explanation to such a proposed price increase, considering that current prices already cover all the costs incurred by Verisign for their performance under the current contract. Under the current "zero inflation" economy, the only business capable of extracting from its customers an average 4,9% annual price increase for the foreseeable future (and in perpetuity ?) is most likely illegal. And this is not even taking into account the other price increases permitted "for certain under extraordinary situations". The 144 million .COM domains mean that the aforementioned proposed changes will not go unnoticed. The first 7% price hike alone will translate into an additional 79 million dollars rent. Surely such a huge number should make ICAAN pause and think twice before allowing said proposed changes to move forward without any thorough independent study and public debate. Best regards, Guilhem Tardy.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] TLD propose changes to the internet
by Jim Brown Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

These dot COM (TLD) changes will have a significant impact on the Internet for years to come, and only ICANN and Verisign have participated in this decision. I'm writing to respectfully request you all to reconsider your proposed changes to the internet "TLDs." If nothing else, please don't come to any conclusions until you're able to get a great deal more input. Your patience and cooperation are much appreciated concerning this matter. Also, it will assist the many small business professionals like myself. Yours truly, Jim Brown Houston, Texas 77025 [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=sig…> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=sig…> 02/10/20, 05:36:41 PM

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Atlantic Cable Network is opposed
by Don Michaelis Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Don H. Michaelis, Vice President, representing ACN.ONE , and (atlanticcablenetwork.com ), is opposed to the proposed dealing between ICANN and Verisign coming up after February 14th, 2020. I believe this will more than double the cost to consumers in the next decade and I believe most of this us unnecessary. Respectfully, Don H. Michaelis. West Coast Operational Vice President, ACN Marysvile, CA. 95901 Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Limiting Rights
by Nancy McFarland Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Access & Rights to utilize the internet for people all over the world is limited as costs increase. REALLY, to what end are costs being increased to purchase domains? I have not been made aware of a reason of either logic or global community consideration.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price increase
by Russell Turner Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

This is wrong ICANN, you have made changes in secret, without consulting or incorporating feedback from the ICANN community or Internet users. You oversee domain names and the changes to the contract with Verisign, Inc. should not increase .COM top-level-domain. These increases will hurt me and all internet users. Please rethink the changes you have made. Thank you for your support! Russell Turner

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] keep .com accessible to everyone
by Rebecca Murakami Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please stop .com prices from rising. The internet is for everyone. Thank you. Rebecca Murakami

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] About the increase of the .com domain
by Carlos Andrés de Invektor Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello Icann Organization you shouldnt increase the prices of the .com domains that way! -- Carlos Andrés Bonilla Grupo Invektor.com Móvil / Wtsapp. (57) 311 4428304 Armenia - Colombia.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Kaleb Fulgham Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To Whom It May Concern: I am a registrant of several .com domain names. I stand with others against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is more than justified. Please do not be cave or be soley directed by groups like Verisign. The ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name registration system in the public's best interest. -Kaleb Fulgham Austin, TX, United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by HERSEY Mark Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am user of 2 .com domains and I object to this amendment. ICANN Is supposed to work in the public interest and this amendment, even if it were to be necessary for reasons I am not aware of, has been undertaken in a manner that I object to. It is secretive and takes every opportunity to obstruct comment. It also makes the changes to the fees deeply obscured. If you are at all serious about public feedback you should not proceed with making these changes Mark Hersey Technical Director

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increases - dissenting comment
by jknapp85＠gmail.com Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

The proposed increase of the .com prices would greatly impact not only me personally, but the business I have started providing hosting for people. We have tried to keep prices manageable, but when price increases are allowed to flow unchecked, it hurts everyone.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increases
by sam schieuer Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I’m am 100% against this. As a small business, it’s hard enough this day and age, and huge price increases to keep our online presence is the last thing we need. Please do not do this. Sam Schieuer Owner Schiwerks Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0