- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ryan Sturmer Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Good day, I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Ryan Sturmer 14 Murray St, Suite 237 New York, NY 10007 United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mesut Soylu Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Istanbul, Istanbul Turkey

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Timothy Allen Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Good day I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Hiking prices for domain names makes them unaffordable for poor or third world registrants, increasing the divide between haves and have-nots. DNS is a system that relies on everyone using a single, authoritative source. Increasing prices could act to split the internet based on location or income level. Timothy Allen Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Nate Levesque Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of several .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. If the cost of managing .COM names were increasing, I would have no problem with a gradual price increase, or finding a company other than Verisign to manage the registry if they could do it cheaper. However, based on the costs we know, and the costs of the new gTLDs, that does not appear to be the case. I'm highly disappointed that ICANN is relinquishing control of its responsibilities. Nate Levesque Rochester, New York United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Caicedo, Jonathan Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. jcaicedo.com to be specific. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has no business dictating the price. Jonathan Caicedo Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ________________________________ IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Silvio Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Silvio Tomatis Berlin, Land Berlin Germany

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Daniel Abbott Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. *Eat a dick with that money grabbing bullshit you've been pulling recently. * Daniel Abbott Vilnius, Vilnius Republic of Lithuania

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Björn Rohlén Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am associated with a registry. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Carl Gustav Stockholm, Stockholm Sweden

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Nigel Powell Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains because it is unnecessary and punitive for an essential service. Nigel Powell Acton, England United Kingdom

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Frédérique Mittelstaedt Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Gregor Frédérique Mittelstaedt London, England United Kingdom

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Douglas Patac Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, Why the increase? There is no real reason, except a money grab. I am a registrant of a .com domain name. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Please stop. Douglas Patac Bennington, Vermont United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I'm against this ridiculous proposal
by 二宝 Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

This is an official email, please read it carefully. Dear ICANN member, hello I just learned through my domain registrar that the com domain price is going to increase. In my opinion, I strongly oppose this ridiculous proposal! We know that a domain name is a symbol of a website's appearance and the cornerstone of the Internet. In my impression, the domain name should be a symbol of the Internet. The representative of the domain name, the com suffix actually intends to increase the price, and it is increasing every year. I can't understand the positive effects of this ridiculous proposal in addition to bringing profits to Verisign. Negative effects, I can cite a lot. For example, we are advocating free internet today, and we hope that everyone will build a website and become part of the internet. But this approach is clearly the opposite. I hope ICANN can reject this unrealistic proposal after serious discussion.                                                                                                                                                                                                Chinese personal webmaster,Liu Ming

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Michael Saringer Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Toronto, Ontario Canada Regards, Michael Saringer

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Milan Cvejic Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Milan Echterdingen, Baden-Württemberg Germany

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Matthias Pöschl Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Matthias Pöschl Sistrans, Tyrol Austria

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Abdülhakim Ünlü Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Abdulhakim Unlu Istanbul, Turkey

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by cody＠codykonior.com Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Cody Konior Perth, Western Australia Australia Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Joel Limberg Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Joel Limberg Tallinn, Harjumaa Estonia

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Philipp Gérard Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Philipp Gerard Berlin, Land Berlin Germany

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Scott Underwood Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. This is not the place to make profit. You see this profit motive will never cease, you will raise and raise and raise. Tired of you wanting more and more money all the time. Scott Underwood Las Vegas

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Muhammet S. AYDIN Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Muhammet S. AYDIN Istanbul, Istanbul Turkey

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Sairam Kunala Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Sai Ram Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Rich Elmes Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already a fair price, this seems to me just about increasing profits for shareholders of Verisign. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Richard Elmes Split, Croatia

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Sorenson Davis Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Davis Sorenson Helsinki, Uusimaa Finland

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Steve Moyer Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement I am a registrant of several .com domain name. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified, perhaps bordering on extortion ... if the purpose of a higher price is to set a higher bar for entry, then why not have a high one-year price with steeper discounts for (e.g.) a ten-year registration. Steve Moyer Boalsburg Pennsylvania, USA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ignas Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Ignas Poklad Bangkok, Thailand

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Max Bevelander Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

The ICANN shouldn’t be after profits, keep your American capitalism out of top level domains. I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Max Amsterdam, North Holland Netherlands

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Randy Rutherford Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Randy Ruteherford Nashua, New Hampshire United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Eric Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a few .COM domain names, and I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest— first the .ORG thing and now arbitrary price hikes? Disgraceful. Eric Hanson Cambridge, United Kingdom -- Eric Hanson

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Preston Racette Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Keep .com prices down low. Don't be a discourager of entrepreneurialism.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Daniel Williams Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Daniel Williams Willenhall, England United Kingdom

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Teotónio Ricardo Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Teotonio Ricardo Porto, Porto Portugal

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Regarding The Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Arpit Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi, I am a registrant of many .com domain names which are for my small business and community work. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Regards, Arpit Gupta, Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by James Hartig Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To whom it may concern, I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. The internet should be accessible to everyone and price increases only inhibit that innovation. James Hartig

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price hike
by Neeraj Verma Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear ICANN, I request that please don’t increase the price of .com domains. These domains are backbone of industry and Version is already earning so much of money. If they cant handle this please transfer it to someone who can.Just to make more money for them you should not consider hiking the price. Regards, Neeraj

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Graham Hayes Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. The cost per domain is a fixed (very low) cost, if Verisign cannot make a profit from the current prices, the contract should be re tendered to allow for the public interest. Graham Hayes Dublin, Leinster Ireland

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Christophe Lecointe Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Christophe Lecointe Paris, Île-de-France France

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Evolve TwoKay Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello I am a registrant multiple .com domain name. Many small sites including sites created purely for public good using my skills as a coder. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Please heed this message Rich Koo Adelaide, South Australia Australia Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Peter Cooper Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I support the proposed price increase which allows for a 31% price increase through 2024, if only to reduce the amount of speculation. Peter Cooper

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Zachary Fisher Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Zachary Fisher Guelph, Ontario Canada

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jesse Muller Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To whom it may concern. I am a registrant of a multiple .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign wants increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. With kind regards, Jesse Muller Halfweg, The Netherlands [id:image001.png@01D32667.DECADC80] Jesse Muller jesse(a)paal15.com<mailto:jesse@paal15.com> +31 6 41 91 73 01 Click to Skype<skype:jesse-muller?call> LinkedIn<http://nl.linkedin.com/pub/jesse-muller/a/539/89> Suikersilo-Oost 36 1165 MS Halfweg (Amsterdam) +31 20 30 80 342 (office) KvK nummer: 60351659 www.paal15.com<http://www.paal15.com/>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Timothy Li Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Timothy W Li Boston, MA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Julia Evans Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name and have been registering domain names for 15 years, since I was a teenager and $10/year was a substantial amount of money for me. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Julia Evans Montreal, Quebec Canada

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Torstein Thune Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. As far as I can tell Verisign is already running a steady profit on the .com registry. Any increases in efficiency and decreases in cost, is already at the benefit of Verisign. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Torstein Thune Bergen, Vestland, Norway

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Matt Ruhstaller Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of several .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. I ask you to please reconsider this proposal, and consider all users of the internet, rather than Verisign. Thank you! Matt Ruhstaller Switzerland

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Muhammad Nuzaihan Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Kota Bharu, Kelantan Malaysia ------ pub rsa4096 2019-12-14 [SC] [expires: 2023-12-13] C360 B730 3431 9D3B 69DF FF1D E422 5DE4 B223 0E2F uid [ultimate] Muhammad Nuzaihan Bin Kamal Luddin <zaihan(a)awesell.com> sub rsa4096 2019-12-14 [E] [expires: 2023-12-13]

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Adam Hayward Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear Sir or Madam, I am a registrant of several .com domain names and I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely managing of the .COM Registry and it has no business dictating the price. Please remember that ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Yours faithfully, ADAM HAYWARD Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain Tel. +34 654373395

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Hock Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hi admin, I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. He Xi.Yu(Hock.)0359-4022458 Shanxi China.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by colum walsh Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Colum Walsh Dublin, Leinster Ireland Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] OPPOSED to Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Adam Sah Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a registrant of multiple .com domain names. I am OPPOSED to the proposed price increase to .COM domains, if anything they should be lowered because it costs less each year to manage .COM: the current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest, not to the benefit of Verisign. Adam San New York, NY (via cellphone, random spelling ahead)

1 0