- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price Increases
by Sterling Kahn Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please do not increase the barriers to entry for those who want to have an internet presence. A ".com" website is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet, and pursuing such a path - especially without alerting those who would be impacted - I think is a truly awful thing to do. Please consider the impact of your actions, aside from personal gain. -- Sterling Kahn kahnsk(a)gmail.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Rise too high
by icann-comment＠tekoasis.com Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

The proposed rise is way too high. The amount of the rise should be much lower and it should not be in perpetuity. It should only be for a few years and see how verisign abuse it. It should be revised every 10 years or so. ICANN should work for the people and take decision for the people, not to enrich their own pockets.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] no to price hike
by Craig Sunney Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello Just a quick note to say I am against a price increase. Thanks Craig Sunney owner of 30 dot.com domains.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No price increase
by Jan Scorl Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

The price increase is not necessary. The current price levels are sufficient. All the best, Jan Scorl

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] This is bs
by barak waxter Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am very against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. This is BS Barak Waxter Tillamook, Oregon United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] We oppose any increase in domain fees!
by Ed Meek Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

We are a small company with big ideas. We own many domain names that are part of our long-range planning. An increase of 7 percent per year for four years in domain fees will kill our dreams and perhaps our business. We very much oppose any such increases. Ed Meek, Ph.D *President & CEO *

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] My Opinion on the Proposed .Com Price Increase
by MihaelaOnline Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, My name is Mihaela Coman and I am a registrant of a few .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest and this increase would not add any benefit to the public. Owning a domain name has become a must when you have a business, a group that has a special interest or a hobby you want to share with the world. This increase would not bring value to anyone but the company pocketing the money and that does not feel caring for the rest of the individuals just trying to have a way to reach the world. Mihaela Coman Orlando , Florida United States Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by richb＠magratech.com Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

The Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement is a VERY bad idea.. Raising the price of the .com domain will severely impact our business and cause us to raise prices for all our customers. This inflationary adjustment will be an impact for a lot of people and only benefit a very few. Please reconsider this proposal and NOT increase this cost for everyone. Thanks, Richard J Bucci Magratech Owner <http://magratech.com/> http://Magratech.com <mailto:RichB@Magratech.com> RichB(a)Magratech.com Phone: 386-878-4295 FAX: 928-569-8596

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] In Opposition of Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by James Kupke Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, I own a .com address. I do not agree with the amendment above. The fees for .com addresses are sufficient as is. James

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN PROPOSED CHANGES
by scott Levine Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

As a owner of several websites, I am very opposed to the Amendment 3 proposed increase of 7% by Verisign in the coming year and subsequent years. They are already charging too much for a monopoly that allows them a handsome profit. Please do not vote to increase .com registration prices. Scott Levine MD

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mihaela Coman Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, My name is Mihaela Coman and I am a registrant of a few .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest and this increase would not add any benefit to the public. Owning a domain name has become a must when you have a business, a group that has a special interest or a hobby you want to share with the world. This increase would not bring value to anyone but the company pocketing the money and that does not feel caring for the rest of the individuals just trying to have a way to reach the world. Mihaela Coman Orlando , Florida United States Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jonathan Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, I wanted to voice my opposition to the Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. It opens the door to greatly increased prices for dot com domains over the next decade. Operating websites is already expensive enough for us all. Please keep our cost of owning .COM domains as low as possible. Sincerely, Jonathan Sherman

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase.
by Jay Lohmann – DS Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

If you raise prices by 28% over the next 4 years, I'd have to drop at least 75% of my portfolio. -- -- Jay A. Lohmann Founder/Investor 214.679.9673 –––––––––––––––––– DallasStartups.com DallasAdvertising.com TrophyHunts.com –––––––––––––––––– LinkedIn.com/in/JayLohmann ––––––––––––––––––

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com prices need to stay
by Scott Thompson Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please do not increase the cost of .com domain names. With the influx of new, cheap TLDs, a price increase will only make .com affordable to fewer and fewer people globally. Thank you, Scott Thompson, CEO AstoriaCompany.com 510-663-7016

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN proposed contract with Verisign
by Doug Rose Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am very much opposed to entering a secret contract with Verisign that allows them price increases over ten years without any competitive pricing pressure. My research indicates they have a very low fixed cost to manage the domain registry and the fact they have gained your compliance with a $20 million return to ICANN is disturbing Federal government "practice". Doug Rose 512.657.3392 drose(a)drcgroup.com<mailto:drose@drcgroup.com>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .com Registry
by John and Remi Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

To Whom it May Concern, I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed Amendment 3. I feel that this amendment is doing a disservice to the average person who would like to purchase a .com domain and it would only benefit those who already have the ability to pay higher fees for the domains. Please keep the average person in mind and do not pass this amendment. Sincerely,Remi Taflan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I will most likely change my domain name if this happens.
by Doug Edwards Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hi, I think this might cause a lot of smaller or unestablished companies to change domain extensions. That could be worth considering. Thanks, Doug Edwards

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please don't do this?
by Igor Zharii Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please don't do this? — Igor, .com domain owner

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] US Department of Commerce said both ICANN and Verisign do NOT have antitrust immunity
by Don Smith Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

“ICANN does not have antitrust immunity. U.S. competition laws will continue to apply to ICANN, as they do today.” “U.S. competition laws would apply to the conduct of ICANN and its constituent groups in their performance of the IANA functions to the same extent as those laws now apply to other private entities, and thus these laws can serve to discourage ICANN and its constituent groups from engaging in anticompetitive conduct that would harm Internet users.” With respect to Verisign: “Antitrust Immunity: The Department’s approval of this Amendment 35 is not intended to confer federal antitrust immunity on Verisign with respect to the .com Registry Agreement.”

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Increase in domain registration fees...
by admin＠westlakemedicalarts.com Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Dear Sirs/Mesdames: Small businesses like us almost always bear the brunt of government regulation and fee increases that are used primarily to feed bureaucracy growth. As an owner of several hundreds of domains used to support our businesses, this would unfairly impact the very backbone of the great American economy, a small business. Please leave the domain registration fees as they are, there are no valid reasons presented to raise them. Thank you, Clay Womack Practice Administrator <>< <>< <>< Clay Womack Westlake Medical Arts 5656 Bee Cave Road Suite E-200 West Lake Hills, Texas 78746 512.327.8700 Voice 512.327.8701 Fax The Most Advanced Anti-Aging, Functional & Regenerative Medicine Clinic in Texas [signature_700808314] If this is an emergency or crisis situation, please call 911 immediately or have someone take you to the nearest emergency room. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. HIPAA Privacy Notification: This message and accompanying documents are covered by the Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and contain information intended for the specified individual(s) only. This information is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by e-mail, or phone: (512) 327-8700, and delete the information from your records (including electronic trash/recycling bins).

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please do not go ahead with Icann Price increases
by david howell Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please do not raise the web site registration fees. It's a tough market now and hard for small business's to stay profitable

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Call, Larry Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Larry Call Germantown, Maryland United States Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Cyrill Reiser Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Cyrill Reiser Los Angeles, California *Cyrill Reiser* Founder & CEO p: +1 (818) 806-8580 e: cyrill(a)swissit.solutions w: www.swissit.solutions

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Rheynard Howard Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Rheynard Howard Pearland, Texas United States Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Sean McPartlin-Multiview Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

If you continue to increase the cost of .com registry cost at the proposed 7% increase per year that will end up hurting a lot of small and medium sized businesses that our company services. We would be forced to increase our costs. We own nearly 2K domains or more. That’s a significant potential increase In costs. We do not thing any increase over the rate of inflation is fair or justified. Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Richard Bayer Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Richard Bayer Santa Cruz, California United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Luke Stevenson Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Luke Stevenson Sydney, Australia

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposition to Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Tomas Leon Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

The proposed amendment is not in the interest of the public or the Internet and would disproportionately impact individuals and small businesses/groups that use .coms. Any gain to Verisign and ICANN is more than offset by than harm that will come to users and maintainers of the Internet. Tomas Leon

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] My Opinion on the Proposed .Com Price Increase
by Richard Bayer Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please do not increase these rates by 30% over the coming years. We are a small business and these would be a great hardship. Thank you, Richard Bayer *SnoWonder Inc. - *Richard Bayer - *Direct Phone: *831-429-1444 *Mail:* 5610 Scotts Valley Dr #525, Scotts Valley , CA 9506 6 USA *Toll Free:* 888-487-7669 *Fax: *866-580-4120 *www.snowonder.com <http://www.snowonder.com/>* * richardsnowonder(a)gmail.com <richardsnowonder(a)gmail.com>*

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Increase in .com prices will not go in favor of internet users
by Muhammad Roohan Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I must say that this step which is in consideration by iCANN is not going to deliver something good, but it will disturb the overall internet users.

1 0

Re: [Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by David Schlachter Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

To whom it may concern: As the owner of a dot com domain (davidschlachter.com) I see no reason why Verisign's share of fees should increase at a rate higher than inflation. Costs of maintaining the dot com registry should decrease (per domain) year over year as efficiencies are implemented. If costs are increasing they are a result of a) no competition or b) perverse incentives encouraging over-spending. In the public interest fees should be kept at similar levels in perpetuity. David Schlachter

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com Price Increase
by Domain Business Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I strongly oppose any price increase by Verisign for .coms. It would hurt my business. Brent King Domain Business Developers, Inc.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Fee increase
by ScooterAds Team Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

We have been massive advocates of the internet becoming open and inclusive to all. In today's changing world with emphasis on big-tech and institutional investors we feel it's shocking and really hard to watch you strike this new deal for $20M to allow larger, faceless, corporate entities have more control over .com domains due to having larger bank balances. I hope the good Samaritans amongst you can see the light and reverse the decision to keep new, young and innovative businesses from a range of backgrounds stand a chance against the corporations. I still hold faith in good people out there! All the Best, *ScooterAds Team* E: hello(a)scooterads.co.uk M: (+44) 7743 002 232 W: www.scooterads.co.uk ᐧ

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price
by ggate2020 Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please do not increase the price.ThanksMohammed Sent from my MetroPCS 4G LTE Android Device

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Why does ICANN continue to ignore advice it received from the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division – it should use competitive bidding rather than granting the incumbent operator a perpetual right to renew without competition
by Don Smith Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

--- In particular, competitive bidding prompts bidders to propose and accept registry improvements, higher operating standards, and lower registration fees to win the contract. --- Indeed, competitive bidding has resulted in lower domain prices and higher operating specifications than what ICANN has achieved through non-competitive negotiations. --- Experience with the .net TLD and other gTLDs have showed that competitive bidding in the award of gTLD registry agreements, and periodic rebidding, has served as an effective tool for managing the interest of registrants in gTLDs. --- ICANN’s request for bids should expressly call for bids to specify an internal maximum price that would be charged by the operator for domain registrations, as well as limitations on price increases over time. --- ICANN’s approach to TLD management demonstrates that it has adopted an ineffective approach with respect to its obligation to promote competition at the registry level. --- To date, we believe that ICANN has not come close to fulfilling its obligations to employ competitive principles in its management of TLD registry operations. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/baker-to-dengate-thrush-18dec08…

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] PRICE INCREASE .com domains.
by STEVE CURTIS Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am the owner of a large portfolio of domains. This proposed price increase would have a very significant negative impact on my business. I sincerely hope that this huge price increase is not implemented. STEVEN CURTIS Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Christine Moley Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Christine Moley Warwick, New York United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Brent Ferree Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I totally oppose to the raising of .com prices. It makes absolutely no sense. If anything, technology costs are decreasing. The .com space is saturated, having to make up names as it is and now pay even more. Verisign seems to be the only one benefitting from this. Please do not approve or change the cost structure to .com domain names. I oppose this change. Brent Ferree

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No Thank you
by Gaius Vasiliu Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

To whom it may concern, I am a business owner, and it's hard enough to go through changes online, let alone paying for all the different system services that make it all work. I mean, what do you guys expect everyone to be excited about spending more money? Moves like this overtime WILL push out business form starting. I mean, I'm one, and if this goes into effect, then I am going to have to let go of a lot of domains I've wanted to build. Additionally, moving this hike charge up, you guys are going to be pushing out the little guy and giving opportunity only for the ones with the most significant budgets to run a business online. It's probably the big boys behind this hick to crush the little guy. Owner of 600 domains.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Increase in fees
by CvW FF Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Dear Sirs, As a small business owner and operator of IP, the use of domain names and securing them in advance of projects that my company pursues, is paramount to my success. As a result of these needs, my costs need to be monitored closely and as such an increase in these fees will greatly cause undue stress on my company’s ability to operate securely in its competitive environment. Please do not increase these fees! The US is currently allowing the middle class and the small business a renaissance. ICANN should ensure that the American recovery continues and as such not interfere with this progress because of unnecessary greed. Best, Caspar von Winterfeldt Producer / Executive Producer 228 Park Ave S, Ste. 8788, New York, NY 10003, USA. (O) 310 460 0210 Ext. 504 (C) 310 801 7918 Facebook Twitter The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments (the "Message") is intended solely for the intended recipient(s) and may be confidential, proprietary or otherwise protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, delete this Message and do not disclose, distribute, copy it to any third party or otherwise use this Message. Electronic messages are not secure or error free and can contain viruses. The sender is not liable for these occurrences. The sender reserves the right to monitor, record, transfer cross border and retain electronic messages. 此文件（包括其附件）仅发给指定收件人或机构。其内容可能包含某种享有法律特权或者需要保密的信息。对于任何未经本公司授权而对本文件所载内容进行使用、披露、分发、变更之行为及由此产生的后果，本公司概不承担任何责任。如您并非此文件的指定收件人或机构，请立即通知 Fortune Films, LLC 并立即销毁此文件。谢谢合作。 NOTICE: This communication is vulnerable to being acquired and stored by the National Security Agency (NSA) in secret. Absent a finding of "probable cause" that you and/or I are engaged in illegal activity, such action by the NSA violates my right, guaranteed by the 4th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to be secure from "unreasonable searches and seizures." The parties to this email do not consent to any government official or body collecting, storing, or retrieving this communication or any related metadata.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Raising DOT com fees would create a hardship to my business...
by dale＠networkmarketingservice.com Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

The subject says it all. Please consider large domain owners in your decision to raise fees. I will be forced to drop many of the domains we currently own if the cost of ownership is increased. -- Professional Regards Dale Finney Network Marketing Adviser 303-322-1234 * *

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by seriousoffers＠mail.com Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN/Verisign contract changes detrimental to content creators
by Jackson Ferrell Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am an independent cartoonist and graphic designer who uses .com domain names for my portfolio site and comic sites. ICANN's recent changes to its contract with Verisign, made without input from those it most effects, allow for wholesale price increases to registrars and expanded privileges for Verisign to act as a registrar itself. This will hurt not only registrars, but also website owners like me, independent creators who rely on their sites for income and freelance opportunities. ICANN needs to make decisions in the interests not of a sole entity like Verisign, but for all the businesses, registrars, and website owners that it serves. -Jackson Ferrell Big J Studios <http://www.bigjstudios.com> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Bull shit increase price
by ninfa kpeto Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

We don't agree with that increase you are increasing price like if it is your poket Who pays the money. With your salary it is easy to thing like. I will ask you to go understand why so many prople have a website on blogger like mywebsite. blogspot. com instead of mywebsite. com or the same with mywebsite. wordpress .com So you will understand that the fight a connected world is not on the increasing price but on reducing price to help démocratise the internet. So have a good mind. I which you the best peace and love

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Reduce the price
by Shar Govindan Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

You’ve got way too many extensions and the pricing is exorbitant for volume buyers. Please keep the price affordable.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Large portfolio owner
by Hemp Blunts Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I can tell you right now, us large domain portfolio owners will not hold as many domains. We will register less and sell less, that is killing a very profitable industry. All around trash!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Objection to significant domain price increases
by Dan Liddle Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, This note is to voice concern over the proposal to significantly increase domain prices. The Internet is the single-most scalable way to reach people and communicate. Free speech and open access for all--including lower income folks--is a fundamental right that we should help preserve and support. The current pricing may not be considered high for some (or businesses) but we need to fight hard to keep the costs as absolutely low as possible for those who can barely afford the fee, yet have the same right to be heard as the rest of us. There is a large but limited supply of domains and needs to be treated as a Public Good (in the Economics sense) and needs to be regulated and controlled in order to preserve access for all. Minimal increases of 1-2% to help cover basic costs would be reasonable, but anything above that would stifle communications and access. Thank you for listening. -Dan Liddle

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Laurence Stanway Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. As a business owner I struggle enough as it is without even more expenses. Laurence Brisbane, Queensland Australia Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I own over ten .coms
by Roy Nouneh Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Do NOT increase the price Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] DOMAIN NAME PRICE INCREASES
by Ann King Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

It is OBSCENE that the .com names will rocket in price imminently. I own many, many domain names, and you have ENOUGH of my hard-earned cash already, without putting up prices even more. I am a struggling one-person business, and what's being proposed is PREPOSTEROUS. DO *NOT* ALLOW * THIS

1 0