- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't raise the price of domains [END]
by Dee Barizo Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ken Sorrie Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a number of .com domain names. Verisign has a monopoly. Costs for running a registry through advancing technology and volume are decreasing, yet ICANN is allowing Verisign to increase prices without putting the contract for running the .com registry out to competitive tender. This is a monopoly. This strategy is designed to limit the degree of competition inside a market and reinforce the monopoly power of established business to command excess profits. I am opposed to this contract change and price increases.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 593232222 Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name.  I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. [wzy] [China]

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Feedback
by Rob Hindman Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am opposed to the initiative under consideration to increase .COM prices in the coming years. 1. Please stop the current agreement with Verisign. 2. Please consult with the ICANN community before going ahead with a plan. Sincerely, Rob Hindman

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Andre Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Andre Orange, California United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Arsen Ibragimov Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Arsen Moscow, Moscow Russia -- Арсен Ибрагимов

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase for .com domains.
by Fasih Mohammed Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, It has come to my attention at there is a proposal for increasing the prices for registering and renewing the .com domains. I am writing to you to express my dissatisfaction and opposition to this increase. I am proponent of making things easier and affordable to increase traction and increase profitability. Not to gouge prices and make life and affordability difficult, especially to the new personals trying to enter the WWW domain. Sincerely, Fasih Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by 2domain Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Yunhai Jiang Qiqihaer, Heilongjiang China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Michael Daly Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Michael Daly Las Vegas, Nevada United States Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Public Comment Amendment 3
by Monica Valentinelli Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Dear iCann, I am a small business owner who relies on my *.com domains for promotion and to get work. My domains are valuable to me, and I do not want to pay more money just because they're a *.com. There has to be more transparency and clarity over why such a change is needed, where the funds are going, and how this will benefit *.com owners and users both now and in the future. For this reason, I reject Amendment 3 and ask you to reconsider this initiative. Best, Monica Valentinelli

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Benjamin Onyike Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

It's not a welcome development

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com domain agreements
by Bob Kalus Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, I wish to request that ICANN not proceed with the Verisign agreement without input from the community of owners of .COM domains. I think that you will find a more agreeable group of clients if you involve us in the decisions, and are less likely to lose clients to other domains, which may result in bigger losses than the relatively small near term gains offered by the Verisign agreement. Better for us, better for you. Best, Bob Kalus

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increases
by Kevin Keller Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I’m a small business owner and freelancer. I use my .com web address as a critical client acquisition tool. Raising rates without providing any material benefit is simply price gouging. Do not proceed with 8 increases over the next decade. Don’t make closes door decisions that directly affect everyone. -Kevin Keller -- *KEVIN KELLER* *801.712.6460* www.KevinKellerDesign.com [image: KevinKeller.Design] <http://KevinKeller.Design>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please don't make the Internet less accessible
by Adam Dorsey Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

One of the great things about the Internet is that a person can go to a registrar, grab a name and have their own corner of the largest collaborative effort in human history. The low prices of DNS names have spurred innovation by ensuring that no one is priced out of access to the DNS system. I am deeply concerned by the proposal for ICANN to collaborate with a for-profit organization. I fear that the profit motives of Verisign will override the goals of ICANN and result in another business entity that exists solely to make money, at the expense of the Internet and the DNS system as a whole. I am also concerned with the focus on "attacks on the security and stability of DNS" being used for potential price increases. This same language has been used to erode civil liberties in the US over the past two decades. I am worried that the same tactic will be used here to increase prices on DNS names past the easily accessible levels we have now, and create another system where only large corporations and the wealthy can participate. Please don't tie the future of the Internet to one corporation. -- Adam Dorsey adam.dorsey(a)gmail.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Domain pricing
by Drew Downs Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

To Whom It May Concern, I am concerned about the proposed changes to domain pricing. Particularly given the freedom to raise them significantly and the lack of transparency in the process. While I only personally own a few domains, the cost of these will not only add up, but likely prevent me from trying out new ones. And, let's be honest, as an American, paying $10-15 per year per domain isn't really a huge burden. So going to $15-20 wouldn't really seem like a heavy lift. In practical terms, I would certainly be willing to see fair changes in the system. What I really don't want to see is a radical lack of transparency and agencies feeling free to jack up their prices without real oversight. Please reconsider the proposal and make a determined effort to make transparency and oversight of changes a higher priority. Grace and Peace, Drew Downs

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com proposal
by user Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

To whom it may concern, I as a website owner, am entirely disappointed by your deal with Verisign. Consider my one voice multiplied by 100. Most people agree with me but haven't taken the time to voice their opinion. Please keep me informed as this progresses. Thanks, Danny

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Concerns over Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Sebastian Rodriguez Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hi, I have strong concerns and do not wish for such proposed amendment of the .com registry. - It ill allow .com domain prices to grow by more than 70% - The amendment seems to be due to a one off payment from Verisign of 20M I am concerned of the move as a .com domain user - and how this will impact businesses and individuals. We should not have these bribes happening at the detriment of the internet users. --- Sebastian Rodriguez

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please don't increase the price of domain registrations
by Pete Wann Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

The current pricing is more than sufficient considering the volume you must do. Increasing the costs will all but guarantee that only the most resource-flush companies and people will be able to register domain names, which will stifle innovation and cause harm to young companies. You have a monopoly here -- use it responsibly, don't be greedy.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] My Opinion on the Proposed .Com Price Increase
by Bob Richtman Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Dear sirs, sticking it to the little guy huh? I’m homeless, living inside a two seat truck, in Rancho Santa Margarita CA., and trying to get out from under. Raising prices on me unjustifiably is nonsense. FocalFind.com & StoicMagic.com are two of my ways out I have from my situation. I would appreciate that you not start raising prices on me like this and somehow find a better way, that looks out for people like me. Thank you, Bob Richtman

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] The Internet is not only a protocol, it is also a spirit that must be accessible to the greatest number of people.
by Philippe AGRIPNIDIS Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello. The Internet is not only a protocol, it is also a spirit that must be accessible to the greatest number of people. No increase in the purchase price of .com domain names. Best regards, P.AGRIPNIDIS

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ona Road Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Don't do it! Proposed Amendment 3 will do harm to, and have longterm negative impacts on, the Internet. Fees should mirror costs, but this proposal accelerates fees to provide kickback money to ICANN. By no means should it be adopted! Ona

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM prices increase concerns
by Ivaylo Stoimenov Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, I am writing this to express my concerns with the planned price increases of .COM domain. I do not believe such deals, affecting so many client should be done without public discussion and behind closed doors. I am hoping those amendments can be reversed. Thank you, Ivaylo Stoimenov

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Thomas Seidita Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please do not allow the increase .COM prices. It may cause a collapse.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against Amendment 3 - not in public best iterest
by Kim Evans Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of multiple .com domain names for my small business and non-profit. I am against the proposed price increase to .com domains. There is not a clear benefit to the users other than Verisign making much more money and continuing to profit for an unknown reason. We need to keep prices fair and reasonable for the small businesses and families they support. You are to be operating in the publics best interest so I urge you to do so and not on the financial gains that Verisign would obtain. I find it very suspicious that Verisign wants the increase while so many other registrants of other domain extensions are managing those just fine. We need to avoid yet another high priced monopoly that hurts the small business and individual. Show us EXACTLY where the monies would benefit the consumer? If its security than you need to show us the issues, how the money would be spend and provide true accountability and transparency. To raise prices just because the current agreement has run out and its been several years is NOT. A reason! I am against Amendment 3. Sincerely, Kim Evans

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Yongqiang Qin Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Dear Sir or Madam, I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I heard from my namespace ISP that you would like to raise the cost of owning domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Best Regards. Yongqiang Qin Beijing, Beijing China

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase for .com.? Not so smart decision
by IvanBayan Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello. I'm using my domain in .com for personal purpose, I have no money income from selling ad or products/services, nonetheless I paid for it. Last time I paid near 90$ for domain renewal for 5 years, most likely your changes will lead to domain cost increase by 21% every 5 years. It's really hard to understand for why I pay near 20$ per year now and why I need to pay more. Why most other domains cost cheaper than domain in .com. zone and which expenses do you have that should costs more. ICANN doesn't support domains on ns servers and did nothing for me. If that changes be accepted I will just change zone for my domain. Your future income from me: (20$ - registrar_fee)*0 =0$ Not a big deal, but I sure I'm not only one who will made same decision. -- Ivan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please don't raise the .COM domain price
by Jack Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] My Opinion on the Proposed .Com Price Increase
by JL Berman Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a very small business owner who knows price increases means a less profitable business and fewer employees. Don't do it.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Bad idea - flawed economics
by Stephen Beitzel Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Of course a limited resource will be more expensive than one that is less so. And, of course, the price will ultimately fluctuate with demand. And, the cost of producing the resource will be factored into the total cost. All this said, however, I'd like to see the justification for the proposed change. How is it that the cost of maintaining a database of unique strings is suddenly going to spike over the next few years? It seems pretty unlikely. How is it in the public interest to make the .com namespace more expensive? There's no way the price increase will impact the bottom line of large or even medium commercial enterprises. Even if the yearly cost of a domain increases 100% overnight, that won't even register on the balance sheet for, say, Netflix, Amazon, Microsoft, or Wells Fargo. The only people who will notice this are those on the margins. This will shut down the voices of those who can just barely afford to participate. This seems like a play to grab a bunch of cash while screwing over the people who have the least power. If Verisign needs the money that badly, then we should be paying a lot more attention to their situation. Maybe they need help -- help that might look like lightening their responsibilities, or overseeing their finances. Don't do this. It's not good for anyone who isn't Verisign.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Wrong aproach
by Jacobo221 Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Hello, Allowing a private for-profit company to decide on the prices is wrong. Domains are public for the whole world, their price should not change according to one country's history of prices. The real cost of a domain registration almost has not increased since the early 2000s, if it has at all, in fact it has probably decreased. Jacobo Vilella Vilahur Barcelona, Spain

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by brushparty Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. Cliff Aylesbury, England, United Kingdom www.brushparty.co.uk <http://www.brushparty.co.uk/> Tel: 01844 390208 Brush Party UK Ltd 8 Space Business Centre Smeaton Close Aylesbury Bucks HP19 8FJ

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Edward LeBlanc Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

To whom it may concern, I am a registrant of a .com domain name and I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. The cost of running a database, amortized over the millions of registrants, does not justify any higher price. A higher price would have to be considered monopolistic price gouging. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. The public interest is served by keeping the price for domain registration low enough for normal people to pay. The current price is already high enough. Edward LeBlanc Karlsruhe, Germany

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by JL Berman Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

jlb cambria ca USA You'll eventually drive small business owners into less income or out of business.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Susan Michaletz Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Thank you. Susan Michaletz Minnetonka, Minnesota United States Sue Michaletz PoppedCorn, LLC 5757 Sanibel Drive, #10 Minnetonka, MN. 55343 952.452.8808 store 507.382.1131 mobile

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Chris Coleman Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of 11 .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. A domain registration is ultimately just a row in an online database! Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Keeping the existing rate is part of that responsibility to the public interest. If Verisign is complaining about not receiving enough money, then how about open partitioning the hosting of the .COM registry to multiple other US based registries? Quite sure there’d be many interested takers. Christopher Coleman Hartford, Connecticut United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Seat Of My Pants Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. As a small business owner, every penny counts. Please support the small business owner by not increasing these fees. Thank you, Jennifer Rima Los Angeles, California United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] My Opinion on the Proposed .Com Price Increase
by Susan Michaletz Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please do not raise registration prices. Sue Michaletz PoppedCorn, LLC 5757 Sanibel Drive, #10 Minnetonka, MN. 55343 952.452.8808 store 507.382.1131 mobile

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by maf＠moreairfactory.com Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Please keep the annual fee very low or consider a more flexible charging system for the .COM top level domain that will keep it accessible to individuals and small businesses. I totally oppose to the raising of .com prices. It makes absolutely no sense. If anything, technology costs are decreasing so this should too. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Thanks. Kind Regards MAF

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Christine Marie Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of several .com domain names. I use all my web sites for good purposes, to benefit individuals and society. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Christine Marie Hildale

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Naresh Rekhi Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Naresh Rekhi CENTREVILLE, VA, USA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Van White Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. VAN H WHITE NEWPORT NEWS

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Luis Liceaga Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Luis Liceaga Monterrey, Nuevo León Mexico Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ognjen Milosevic Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am associated with the secondary market in domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Ognjen Belgrade, Belgrade Serbia Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by bill＠wmorin.com Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. William Morin New York

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ben Lopez Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Benjamin Lopez Wheaton, Illinois, USA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Francisco Torres-Figueras Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has no business dictating the price as there is no actual hosting, emailing, or any other service provided by Verisign for my registered domains. Francisco Torres Pompano Beach, Florida United States

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Paul Liotsakis Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Let’s keep it that way. I am against any proposed hikes. Paul L San Francisco, California United States Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Concerns Re: Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by James Kelley Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

Dear ICANN, There needs to be a more transparent and open process in regulating the pricing structure for the .com Registry. While Verisign manages the .com Registry, it does not own it. As such, it has no business dictating the price without a competitive bidding process that is open, transparent, and in the best interests of the public. I am a registrant of a .com domain name, and I am vehemently against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN has a duty to govern the domain name system in the public interest, and the price increases are not in the public interest. James Kelley Boston, MA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposition to .COM wholesale pricing changes
by Gary Von Schilling Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I’m against the proposed changes affecting .COM domain prices for registrars. It is very important that these prices remain affordable for individuals and small businesses who purchase domains. If anything, we should be capping prices and lowering hurdles of entry for domain ownerships, as these become more important for people and businesses as time goes on. Thanks, Gary Von Schilling

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Darko Salazar Feb. 12, 2020

Feb. 12, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. John Limmonds Needham, Massachusetts United States

1 0