- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Public Comment
by Brian Neltner Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, I recommend against allowing any price increases for domain registration. The cost of serving and registering gDNS domain names has gone down, not up. Verizon is making a transparent money grab and you are making yourselves appear complicit. I am very sincerely worried that if you go down this rabbit hole you will end up neutering ICANN entirely and force people to use alternate gTLD domain name service approaches that will dilute ICANN's authority and ultimately fragment the internet. This is bad for everyone, having a central authority to resolve disputes is very desirable but if you price everyone out I am confident people will work around you. This will further dilute our ability to disrupt foreign propaganda and keep the internet accessible to all, which directly aids authoritarian regimes. And the appearance is that this is just a money grab, which makes it even more embarrassing. I hope that this is not your intention. Please keep big telecom from further putting a tax on using communication tools despite their costs going down over time. We allowed them a monopoly and that conveys a responsibility to make prices commensurate with providing a public service. Sincerely, Brian Neltner, Ph.D. Technical Instructor, MIT

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposition to proposed amendment 3
by jacob duyon Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I would like to voice my opposition to Proposed Amendment 3. I believe that the global DNS registration system should be run primarily as a public concern. The only entities that stand to benefit from the proposed arrangement are verisign itself, at the expense of the public. These price hikes will impact the millions of small, independent businesses and developers that rely on the system as is to make their livelihood. Further, this could prove yet another point of pressure that convinces a small business to make their online presence exclusively in the Facebook walled garden and eschew the web itself. The web, and global DNS, were envisioned to be run for the public good, and they SHOULD be run for the public good. Deals such as this are an abdication of that mandate; short sighted profit chasing at the expense of all else. Please do not adopt this proposal.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] 7% is too high
by David Joerg Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, 7% increases are not reasonable. Global inflation is at 3.4%. A 3 or 4% annual increase is tough but fair. Thank you, —David Joerg

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Public comment on .COM changes
by Brooke Harris Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The changes proposed will ultimately make .COM domains less accessible and more expensive for everybody. I do not agree with these changes proposed. [cid:image001.jpg@01D5E0CE.652A6660] bharris(a)success-sciences.com<mailto:bharris@success-sciences.com> www.success-sciences.com<http://www.success-sciences.com/> www.communication-coach.com<http://www.communication-coach.com> www.comCOACHgo.com<http://www.comCOACHgo.com> Office: 813.989.9900x706 Cell: 239.896.3691

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Public comment
by Sarah Collins Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, As a small business owner and owner of two .com domains, I was concerned to hear about the proposed amendment to the .COM Registry Agreement. I understand that the proposed changes could impact the cost of .COM registries, raising prices to a consumer like me by as much as 70% over time. That increase would very likely put my .COM ownership out of reach. I would very much oppose changes which would result in an excessive increase in .COM ownership fees and simply wanted to share my opinion as an owner on the matter. Thank you, Sarah Collins Oregon Small Business Owner

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com objection time price increases
by May Lim Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The economy with the latest coronaV has affected businesses across the board in most countries & the aftermath will be suffered for indefinite period to come We appreciate that this is not done to force biz to switch domain TQ Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by allen temidayo Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

Re: [Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Rob Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I'm concerned about the proposed changes for a three primary reasons: 1. No transparency into use of the $20 million ICANN will receive If ICANN needs $20 million, then share a plan on what the needs are and how it's going to be used. As ICANN is a non-profit organization, information should be shared openly. If this is for hefty raises for ICANN upper management, I strongly recommend that you reconsider. 2. The large price hikes over the next four years Increasing wholesale prices 7% each year will cause .com domain prices to become prohibitive to a large segment of individual and small business domain owners. This should not be a money-grab, and ICANN should ensure that the for-profit companies they work with are not price-gouging customers. This looks exactly like a way to pad Verisign's bottom line numbers, to the tune of upwards of $800 million. Compared to the $20 million ICANN will get, this is a bargain for Verisign. As stewards for TLDs, ICANN should re-evaluate the rate hikes. 3. Allowing Verisign to act as both .com TLD operator and domain registrar. This is clearly a conflict of interest, and allows Verisign to effectively run in a monopoly-like fashion. This shouldn't be allowed. Period. I hope these comments are taken into account, and weighted accordingly.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Peter Bloeme Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom This May Concern: I am against Verisign being allowed to increase the wholesale price to registrars for .com domains by 7% almost every year through 2029. And, I do not fee that permitting Verisign to operate as a Domain Registrar is in the best interests of the internet. Finally, I support price caps in order to keep Domain Prices in check and do NOT support the elimination of them. Sincerely, Peter Bloeme • Director Skyhoundz <https://skyhoundz.com/> 770-751-3882 <tel:770-751-3882> 770-740-1665 <tel:770-740-1665> prb(a)skyhoundz.com <mailto:prb@skyhoundz.com> skyhoundz.com <https://skyhoundz.com/> 660 Hembree Pkwy, Ste 110, Roswell, GA 30076 USA <https://maps.google.com/?q=660+Hembree+Pkwy%2C+Ste+110%2C+Roswell%2C+GA+300…> <https://www.facebook.com/Skyhoundz/> <https://twitter.com/skyhoundz> <https://www.instagram.com/skyhoundz/>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Marco Y Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, I think the increase costs of .COM domains is not a Good decision, as it Will affect a lot of businesses. Could you please reconsider that decision so that we can continue with our Business as we’ve been doing so far? Thanks, Marco Yandun Enviado desde Correo<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> para Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I oppose Amendment 3
by Sasha Papko Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This amendment is a terrible idea and, if approved, will lead to the marginalization of those struggling with financial wellbeing by pushing them off of a .com market and ownership. This proposal is great illustration of a careless corporate greed. Shame on ICANN

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed price increases to domain names
by Ian Davies Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

It is an absolute disgrace that this price increase is being pushed through behind closed doors. The internet must remain an open system where the bar to entry is low, and hiking the .com domain name fees year after year would be completely contrary to that. I oppose this decision.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposed to your coming .COM price increases
by Andrew Agostini Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please Don't Raise Prices
by Jeffrey Rowland Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, Just want to add my name to the list of people who think raising the prices for .com is unnecessary and harmful, especially for those of us who own several .com domains and are struggling to make ends meet in the gig economy. A price increase for anything, especially something as intangible but necessary as this is outrageous. -- Jeffrey Rowland http://topatoco.com http://jjrowland.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price
by Ben Peng Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please do not increase the price.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN Price Increase
by Edwin Steen Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

A price increase with no explanation of how the additional funds are going to be used is simply unacceptable. I am strongly opposed to this.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] New Verisign contract: public comment
by luxagen Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi there, There seems to be both a distinct lack of accountability and a worrying conflict of interest in the new Verisign contract that encourages profiteering in .com domains over the next ten years at the expense of domain leasees without any real justification in terms of real costs. The conflict of interest comes in the form of Verisign's significant payment to ICANN; the lack of accountability is in what this money will be used for and how other stakeholders (i.e. leasees) will be protected from negative consequences. This all comes across as extremely shady and likely bad for accessibility of Internet resources over the next decade. ICANN has a responsibility to all Internet users to make reasonable decisions in the management of the critical shared resources it controls. If the current situation results in needless expense of .com domains, I predict that the central role the .com TLD has enjoyed to date will fade away, and this can only hurt ICANN and other players in the long run. Please come up with a better solution that builds in some kind of protection to convince everyone that the tail isn't wagging the dog here. Special interests inevitably play a large part in the management of our shared Internet infrastructure, but that infrastructure should not be used as a cudgel to exploit Internet users with. best regards, Luxagen

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN change in pricing
by Stever1961＠gmail.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I buy a lot of Domains and consult with businesses and individuals. I suggest you do not increase the price or you will put a lot of individuals or businesses out of the market Some is better than something a mentor always tells me! Steve Ramona Office 408-642-6288 Mobile 408-205-9865 *Looking for a business opportunity?* http://steveramona.com/ <https://calendly.com/sramona/30min>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Disagree with the ICANN Verisign deal
by Damien Pierce Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The ICANN Verisign deal allows Verisign to raise .com registration prices. I oppose this deal.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] price increase
by Jasmine ShoShanna Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

We are grateful for the service you provide. Keeping prices low is good of you. I am sure the goodness returns to you ten fold. Jasmine ShoShanna Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price gouging
by Andrew Johnson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am writing to state that the process you all are putting forth to raise the domain registries for every .COM user is absurd and greedy and request that you all reverse course immediately. Raising prices a small amount is understandable. Promising to raise them for 8 of the next 10 years without a commitment to leave them stable is greedy. As a church with multiple .COM addresses, this increased cost will adversely the mission of what we do. Please reverse course. If my understanding is one sided and I am missing the global benefit of this decision, please help me understand. If my understanding is likely right, then...reverse course. -- Andrew Johnson Associate Pastor at Neartown Church Houston, TX 77006

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please don’t raise the price of .com domains
by Pietro Schito Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I just learned that this decision would cause the .com domain prices to raise and I want to express my concern about it. Pietro Schito Writer - Producer +52 333 170 9622 pietro(a)puertafilms.com 🎬 Watch our reel: http://bit.ly/pFilmsReel 🎬 My YT channel: YouTube.com/PietroSchito

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Verisign Contract
by Greg Wong Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom It May Concern, A 70%+ increase in .COM’s over the span of a decade is unacceptable. The internet is open to all, and as a public good should remain affordable. An increasing amount of money is already being made off other TLD’s, and this would give further justification to raise other TLD’s outside of .COM as well. Please reconsider your decision alongside the ethos of the internet. Ask yourself if this choice is ethical and what domino effect this might have. Best, Greg

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I oppose this
by Dania McDermott Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Keep .coms reasonably priced and stop trying to turn everything into millions of unnecessary profit. Gross. -- [image: Aircall] <https://aircall.io/> Dania McDermott Content Marketing Specialist 646-568-7825 dania(a)aircall.io aircall.io/blog

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I disagree
by Charles Kenneth Chidozie Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I strongly oppose the decision of price increase of .COM domain registration. It'll adversely affect all small businesses and individuals holding .COM domains.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Timothy Hemenway Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Is there a detailed plan on how the funds raised by all of the price increases will be used and monitored? I am against this change unless there is a publicly published plan and public accountability for how the funds are used. This should be treated much like many of the utility surcharges are collected and used for future energy projects, open and transparent plan. <http://www.gocreativelighting.com/> Timothy Hemenway COO / Project Development 503-820-4131 <tel:5038204131> WWW.GOCREATIVELIGHTING.COM <http://www.gocreativelighting.com/> 17700 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. Suite 140 // Portland, OR 97224 <https://goo.gl/maps/CnKhCYVCsjE2> OR CCB 202492 // WA L&I 603-411-400

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN changes in secret
by Ryan Sellers Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hey ICANN! This is disgusting what’s going on here. ICANN made these changes in secret, without consulting or incorporating feedback from the ICANN community or Internet users. Although ICANN has a history of making similar deals behind closed doors, and also of ignoring unified opposition against such action, we are focused on leading the fight against price increases that will harm our customers (and the Internet as a whole). Regards, R. A. Sellers

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No to price increases!
by Raivis Booker Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, There should be price caps for domains; you, as a monopoly, cannot decide to just increase prices. It’s going to have a terrible effect on the Internet as a whole, reducing the number of new domains for you, too. Don’t do this!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Objection to the .Com Price Increase
by Akin Visionier Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

As a website owner and Internet user, I strongly object to the proposed increase of prices of .Com domains by Verisign. Over the next decade, the use of the Internet, expecially in developing countries, is expected to triple which will result in tremendous development in economic, educational, health, security and sectors of society. Hence, a price increase in domain names and other Internet services would mitigate development of developing countries. Please, review this agreement and let .Com domain prices remain stable, if not reduced. Thanks for your consideration.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Jeff Patten Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I'm a small business owner and contrary to popular belief, I'm not loaded with money and need to control my costs where ever possible. I understand that there is an amendment to increase our rates, possibly every year over the next ten years. This is not acceptable when we're doing everything possible to just keep the doors open. I haven't heard any reason for why the increases are necessary but would like an explanation for this action. I ask that you please reconsider rate increases on small business domains. Sincerely, Jeff Patten 109 S. Minnesota Ave. Okabena, MN 56161 Ph: 507-853-4742 Cell: 605-254-5913 Fax: 507-853-4722 Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attachments, is for use by the intended recipient(s) only and contains information that may be legally privileged, confidential, trade secret, proprietary in nature or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby formally notified that any use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this e-mail transmission, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. This e-mail transmission does not constitute a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Feedback on Amendments
by Alexey Novopashin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Greetings, I am, as the owner of some “.com” websites, want to vote against such amends. Right know price for .com domains is adequate; further increase isn’t appropriate. Best regards, Alexey Novopashin

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop Raising the domain registration fees
by Jerrold Gibson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

There is no need to raise .com registration fees. You have plenty money as it is just use it more efficiently and stop trying to line your pockets. And when you do backroom deals that is code we're doing some shady business that we don't want anyone to know about. Be transparent, Be trustworthy, Be Moral. Jerrold Gibson

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No to removal of price cap on .COM and other gTLDs
by Ebenezer Dare Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

ICANN is supposed to be seen protecting the interest of the consumer and not conniving with her partners to give consumers a tough life. ICANN, please maintain your integrity and serve your purpose. We say no to removal of price cap on .COM We say no to removal of price cap on .ORG We say no to removal of price cap on .INFO We say no to removal of price cap on .BIZ We say no to removal of price cap on all TLDs We say no to the sales of PIR to Ethos Capital by Internet Society. Thank you and best regards, Ebenezer Dare

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop Verisign deal
by Cady Wachsman Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, The recent closed door decision to let Verisign increase .com prices (in exchange for funding of ICAAN) seems extremely unethical. I firmly disagree with this proposal. Please reconsider. Thank you, Cady ...sent from my black mirror

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] New .com contract
by Jessie Brown Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Lack of openness and transparency and accountability in the new contract is very disappointing. Also the ability to raise prices without accountability or appropriate restriction will cause negative changes in long term damage to the internet as we know it. Please don't! Jessie

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] STOP IT
by Nour Alkurdi Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Shame on you!!! NOUR EDDIN ALKURDI EGYPT

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase for the .com domains
by Alexey Rechkunov Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, As a domain owner, I'm concerned with this initiative as it will lead to the steep price increase for the .com domains. I'd like to keep the pricing undisrupted. Thank you. -- Alexéy Rechkunóv (347) 320-3488

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Higher barrier to entry is bad for the internet
by Rich Paul Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I admit the price of domain names has remained relatively cheap since they were opened up to individuals many years ago. However, I believe that increasing the price of domain names makes the barrier to entry too high and cause harm to the internet as a whole over the next 10 years. With more people turning to “free” services instead of creating their own Web presence, they will be more beholden to the interests of the companies who build these networks on top of the Web. This will continue to give more power to companies who will increasingly dictate what is shared and with whom. Please keep domains affordable for all so the Web itself can continue to flourish. Rich Paul

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN's domain name system initiatives
by Cliff Keith Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

ICANN, I am strongly against the new ICANN's domain name system initiatives. If you continue with the exobanent increase in costs as indicted in what ICANN is planning to do over the next 10 year. I will be forced to not renew my current 100+ domains. IMHO these types of economical moves will lead to a worldwide depression. Then you'll have nothing. Respectfully submitted, Cliff Keith CliffKeith1(a)Gmail.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop .com domain price increases
by Gaurav Hirlekar Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To whomsoever it may concern, Please reconsider the recent amendment allowing Verisign to charge more for wholesale domain registration. .com domains are extremely valuable for individuals and companies as an outlet for displaying their views online and by increasing the price of access, ICANN will be directly responsible for reducing access to free and unrestricted speed online. This goes against the original tenets of the Internet and will help usher in a more centralized and non-diverse internet different from the one we all have benefited from for the past few decades. I strongly urge you to reconsider your part in this undesirable change by passing this recent amendment and hope you will work to swiftly revert the decision. Warm regards, Gaurav Hirlekar

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Samson Amaugo Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am Samson, a student from Nigeria.. having the .com extension to my site at. Cheaper rate has helped me sustain the renewal of my site for two years now.. I plead that let the decision to increase the price be rescinded to help lots of people using it including me.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] The .COM Price Increase Is Incredulous
by Fred Hubert Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I can't believe this is legal. I'll ask my senators and congressmen to investigate these shenanigans. Fred

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Manning, Prof. Christel J. Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To whom it may concern, I control domain name price controls. I chair the Economic & Community Development group of our local neighborhood association in Fair Haven, CT. We are an all volunteer group that organizes neighborhood festivals, community dining out nights, and parks cleanups. We went with Namecheap for our website because it's affordable. There are many little groups like us. Please don't make any changes. Thank you. Christel Manning, PhD Professor Dept. of Philosophy & Religious Studies Sacred Heart University 5151 Park Avenue Fairfield, CT 06825 Phone: (203) 371-7733 Email: manningc(a)sacredheart.edu<mailto:manningc@sacredheart.edu> Web: https://www.sacredheart.edu/academics/collegeofartssciences/academicprogram… Recent publications: Facing Death Without Religion - Harvard Divinity Bulletin<https://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/facing-death-without-religion/> "Meaning Making Narratives among Non-religious Individuals," in New Dimensions in Spirituality, Religion, and Aging https://www.routledge.com/New-Dimensions-in-Spirituality-Religion-and-Aging… Organized Secularism in the United States (https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/466728) Losing our Religion (https://nyupress.org/books/9781479883202/)

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stewardship and Small Businesses - Opposed to Amendment 3
by shamwhit Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN Team, Greetings: I wish to submit an objection to the proposed Amendment 3. It is not clear to me why Verisign should be allowed a monopoly on the most important TLD in the internet, and why ICANN, as steward, should be removing a price cap that protects small business owners and individuals, both Domestically and Internationally. Please reconsider this decision in light of the more erudite commentary submitted by my fellow internet users. Sincerely, Internet User and Tax-Paying American Who Deserves Your Stewardship

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN Amendment 3
by Katherine McKinney Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Price increases on .com domains will hurt small businesses like mine who are struggling as it is to keep our doors open and employees paid. Don’t do it! Katherine McKinney Editor, Dixie County Advocate

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Feedback
by Shawn Goertzen Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am writing to ask that you please limit the cost of .com domains. Keeping domains low cost allows individuals like myself to own and operate different websites. If you continue to let prices climb all domains will just be limited to companies, as they will be the only ones who can afford them. Thank you, Shawn

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please don't make .com more expensive!
by Javad Malaquti Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, hereby I object to your decision to make .com names more expensive. It's really shocking, instead of making it easier and more available to the public, you'll make it more exclusive. This decision doesn't comply with the "free" nature of the internet. I'll hope you reconsider your decision! Greetings -- Javad Malaquti

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I am against the raising of .com pricing.
by Jason Thuli Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop the amendment
by Rahul M Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

So many of us are small family businesses that depend on every cent. Do not make changes to the contract which will only increase .com prices. The only ones that will suffer are those that aren’t big corporations, but rather small businesses. Sincerely Rahul

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Closed door meetings and increase in .com pricing
by Matt Seigel Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please stop having closed door meetings without input from major players. Also, I oppose the new VeriSign deal which in effect means .com pricing can go up by 70% over the next few years.

1 0