- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] The cost of technology should go down, not up
by Richard Uberto Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

All of the relevant technologies are getting less expensive, not more. Use competitive bidding to find someone who can operate at the current price or lower.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Changes to Increase .COM Registration Fees
by Ricky Tankersley Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I would like to make my voice heard and let you know that I do not agree with the proposed changes to increase .COM registration fees. The increase to these fees are not clearly outlined to what the money will be used for. Ricky Tankersley

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] price rise
by Joseph Moore Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I do not agree with your price rise Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICAAN Proposed Price Hike
by ANSELEM KADIRI Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICAAN, I have read through your proposal to effect increase in the cost of the .COM domain. >From a webmaster this is a appeal to reconsider this move as it would mean an unnecessary increase in the cost of creating a site. Please listen to this appeal and that of thousands others that will be negatively affected by this decision. Thanks

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please stop the price increase
by Miinkay Yu Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

hello, I am against an open price increase. This change has the potential to prevent, halt or greatly slow business if we can't afford domain names. We need to know that changes in price will be small and reasonable as with inflation. Please think of the individuals and not the corporations in this change. Thank you, Miinkay Yu

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Price increases
by Brian Yerk Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

These backroom, shady deals have to stop. This is NOT ok! Jacking up prices like this so Verisign and ICANN can have some mutually beneficial deal that enriches them without oversight, using the payment of 20 million dollars over five years to support ICANN's domain name system initiatives, without any clarity about how ICANN will spend the money, or who will ensure that the funds are properly spent on domain infrastructure is just bad, bad, bad! This must stop now! This is an obvious dirty deal for the public. Do NOT let this go through! Brian Yerk

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Re New Rule Changes
by Martin Mitchell Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

As the owner of several. COMs, I am very concerned about the rule changes and wants my opinion to be reflected. I oppose rule changes that will increase the cost of .com OPPOSE! Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM RA
by Nick Ronnei Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I'm writing to express my concern regarding Proposed Amendment 3 (PA3). I do not think PA3 is good for the future of the internet despite what it may offer in the way of security improvements. There are other, better ways to achieve those goals without the dramatic price increases the amendment provides for. The internet is essentially a global public utility. It's not regulated as such (who would truly have the authority?), but it should be run as such. Since the original changes which froze pricing, it has. I understand the need of price increases. Running and maintaining DNS costs more money now than it did years ago. ICANN doesn't directly raise money through the sale of domain names, but operates on donations from companies who do. Those companies need to make more money to donate more money. All of that is fine. However, the amount and scheduling of increases is concerning. My main concerns are the increase percentage and the scheduling. Year-over-year for 4 years followed by only a two year freeze doesn't make sense for a utility. It /especially/ doesn't make sense considering that the same agreement applies following the total 6 year period. It allows for very significant price changes over the same period of time where, historically, we've seen /none/ and during which the internet has also matured and become essential in so many ways it never was before. That's what we're sacrificing with this strategy—the expansive growth and development we've seen over the last 8 years. Consider 5% every 3 years instead. It's more reasonable, it's more gradual, and it reflects increased costs in a more realistic way. The current schema is clearly a money grab and it's insulting. Thank you for reading, Nick Ronnei Web Developer

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No to price increase
by Philip Nartey Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Afternoon, I am unhappy with the proposed price increase. Please revert this decision, Thanks Phil Disclaimer: IMPORTANT - CONFIDENTIAL: Recognising that in certain situations Exertis does not work directly with the end-user, all information will in such instances be solution assured by the reseller through the relevant manufacturer. In such instances Exertis accepts no liability. All sales are subject to Exertis standard terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request or online at www.exertis.ie. Pricing is only valid on the day it is quoted and all quotes have to be re-confirmed ahead of placing order E&OE.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price Increase
by Jamie Krautkremer Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To whom it may concern, I am writing to express my absolute disgust at the news of this backdoor deal to increase the price of .com wholesale prices. This increase will drastically hurt small web developers such as myself as well as other small businesses that need a website to drive their business. I could totally understand a small increase here or there as the cost of living increases. But to setup a deal that would allow a rate increase of up to 70% for 8 out of the next 10 years is absolutely asinine. All this will do is hurt the end user and all the business along the way. Please reconsider this deal.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com TLD price increases...
by Charles Newby Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom It May Concern, As a leaseholder of several top-level-domains, I very much oppose ICANN’s proposed new business arrangement with Verisign since, over time, the proposed arrangement is designed to increase TLD prices over time. Listen to your customers, the Internet Community: Keep the Internet non-profit! Charles F. Newby Evergreen, Colorado USA

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Save Small Businesses
by Matthew Bamber Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please do not raise the prices or allow for raising the prices of web domains, it can cripple small business owners like myself who really need these services to get my business name out there. Raising prices on domain names can significantly hinder business from getting started. Thank You, Matt Bamber

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] How about not giving Verisign an unfair market advantage
by Justin Phillips Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I'm sure this will be ignores just as your org has before but this time your behaviors are blatantly corrupt from the start. You'll give Verisign an unfair advantage so you can gain additional revenue yourselves on the backs of the end customers. Thats call bribery, corruption and collusion in most circles.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Paul Brandich Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Greed is one of the seven deadly sins, and I'm not even religious. Please reconsider using your power and realize that constantly shifting wealth to the "top" will only lead to the downfall of society as we know it. Who wants class warfare when we all can live a decent life as the status quo. Signed, The hard working Middle Class (i.e. the Lifeblood of the Economy)

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I am OPPOSED to Amendment 3
by Greg and Cheryl Sabens Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I recently learned that ICANN recently chose to make changes to a contract with Verisign, Inc. in secret. These changes were done without consulting the ICANN community or Internet users. These changes will ultimately cause detrimental harm to the Internet as a whole by increasing .COM domain prices by 40% or more. This is a typical, elitist method of choking out something that is a right to all inhabitants of the world; an affordable Internet. I am sick and tired of the elites and 1-percenters taking advantage of the hardworking people of the world for their own benefit and pleasure. If working for the good of humanity is equal to making close-door deals, then those doing so are clearly working evil instead. I strongly oppose Admendment 3 and highly recommend that this amendment be scrap in every way. I also recommend that all proposals be clearly advertised to everyone that would be affected (usually the world, considering we are talking about the Internet) and given much more than a few weeks for public comment. No more secrets and closed-door deals. Greg Sabens

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Septimus Boshoff Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] just don't. I don't mind starting using another root server system with all those have happened in the past year about ICANN and domain providers<eom>
by Likun Chen Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed .COM price increase
by Justin Cromartie Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of multiple .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Not what we want
by Jonathan Bentley Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This change is not what users of the internet want. Making content creation less attractive on the internet would be a huge deterrent for a lot of creators today. Increasing pricing of .COM domains is hurting your consumers and your end goal. This wreck less behavior will lead to desertion of this TLD and would be catastrophic for our different modes of work. Sincerely, Jonathan B. Bentley

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN Fee Increases
by Steven Peters Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I am sending this email to comment on the proposed new iCANN pricing changes. As a longtime user and low-level developer of web application alongside the three businesses I've started and own, I feel I have enough history to appreciate the depth and breadth of what iCANN's proposal means across a few different web user profiles. I just can't see how one organization, who's attempt to some degree is financially hijacking the system literally everyone has become so deeply embedded and dependent on is just wrong. When a company has virtually no competition, and has been an active participant-(of course alongside many organizations who stand to benefit from possible changes to the web) in promoting deeper and deeper involvement from everyone, and has free reign to take those rare conditions and run against the good to almost every American-(global citizen?), who can read and hold a phone, something has to change. There are reasons that tight rules and conditions are in place for other organizations that are in a similar situation where free-market conditions can come into play forcing competitors to provide the best solution at the best price-not any price. Companies like electric utility companies (which I know a little about), communication companies, etc... When similar kinds of controls are non-existent, and the competitive market forces to keep pricing in check are absent, can anyone blame a U.S. company for taking what they want, any way they want? By today's standards? Thank you, *Steve Peters* President, Dragonfly Solar p: 612.499.7107 e: s.peters(a)dragonflysolar.com w: http://www.dragonflysolar.com <http://www.dragonfly-solar.com> *CONFIDENTIALITY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY NOTICE: *This email and all attachments may include proprietary information intended for the use of the recipients addressed in the communication and therefore constitute "Confidential Information". Any designs, plans or other proprietary work prepared by Dragonfly Solar remain the exclusive property of Dragonfly Solar and may not be disclosed, distributed or re-used in any way without the written consent of Dragonfly Solar. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by replying to this email and destroy all copies of this original message. Thank you for your cooperation.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement - No to price increase
by Edward Dekeratry Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

No to proposed price increases for .com domains. More transparency requested regarding Version’s contribution of U.S. $20 million dollars over five years, beginning on 1 January 2021, to support ICANN's initiatives to "preserve and enhance the security, stability and resiliency of the DNS, including root server system governance, mitigation of DNS security threats, promotion and/or facilitation of DNSSEC deployment, the mitigation of name collisions, and research into the operation of the DNS.”. How will this money be spent?

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I oppose amendment 3 to the Registry agreement with Verisign
by Noah Scalin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I oppose amendment 3 to the Registry agreement with Verisign. You should not make changes that ultimately hurt a large portion of the .com owners, many of whom, like me, do not make substantial (if any) income from their domain ownership. These increases ultimately create a less diverse and less accessible internet. Future plans should be made with transparency rather than secrecy. Thank you, Noah Scalin

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Regarding Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Alexander Smith Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom it May Concern, I am writing in regards to Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. I am a software engineer with multiple registered domain names used for both personal and business purposes. I wholeheartedly OPPOSE this proposed change for the following reasons: 1. If this proposed change were to take it effect, within 10 years, .COM domains could cost approximately 70% more than the current wholesale price of $7.85. The proposed increases do not align with the current rate of inflation and no justification has been given regarding the reasoning for these massive price increases. 2. Lack of accountability. As part of this proposed amendment, Verisign has greed to pay ICANN an additional $20 million dollars over five years. However, there are no stipulations in place regarding how this money will be used or any outside accountability mechanisms for ensuring all dealings are open and honest. 3. The proposed changes will put new registrars at a significant disadvantage. Existing registrars receive 6 months notice for impending price increases and have the opportunity to lock-in prices at a pre-increase rate for up to 10 years. However, new domain registrars will not be able to receive these discounts, giving incumbent registrars a distinct advantage and thus stifling innovation. I urge that the current proposal be abandoned and that a fairer and more transparent price increase model be adopted. Price increases should be consistent with the rate of inflation and not subject to arbitrary agreements made by companies whose interests might not align with the greater good of the internet. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Alex Smith, Travelers Rest, SC USA --------------------------------------- Alex Smith tradesmanhelix.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3
by Josh West Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am wholly against ICANN's approach to amendment 3. The fact that they do this also behind closed doors knowing that it impacts the global internet community is outrageous.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3
by Manuel Berlanga Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

“Verisign, Inc.: An Internet Monopoly” Verisign is indeed some kind of legal monopoly, the company with the exclusive rights to issue Dot-com domains, they faces no viable competitive pressures to rein in costs, will likely then seek a price increase. The US Government has stepped in before to freeze Dot-com prices. It is time for it to do so again to protect Internet users. Best Regards!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Unjustified domain price hike
by moshe vogel Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, I heard that you were planning on making changes the payment required for . Com domains. I have a few domains that I use for charitable causes, and decision taken without input from anyone else means that I will need to pay so much more for my non profit domains. Please reconsider this rash decision. Thank you.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Do not pass Amendment 3
by Blake Washer Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This backroom deal was set up without oversight or consideration of the good of the Internet at large and should not be allowed. Coupled with the outrageous .ORG changes, ICANN is proving itself wholly unworthy of the power granted it. -- Blake Washer Security Analyst onShore Security Because Security Gives Us Freedom. 312.850.5200 x108 www.onShore.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price Increases for .com domains
by Miya Cox Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom it May Concern: I was disheartened to hear your company has chosen greed over providing a fair price for your .com services. This is a clear sign of collusion between two companies to bolster profits, and it will forever negatively affect the internet. I am asking along with millions of other people for you to reconsider your position on this matter. Thank you for your time! Sincerely, A concerned internet user Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Duncan Robertson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to you, as an internet user since the early 1990's, to express my concern over the changes to the above. May I remind you of the purpose of ICANN, its importance to the internet and foundations upon which it stands? On ICANN's own website, there are words such as "multi-stakeholder model" explained as "This is a community-based consensus-driven approach to policy-making. The idea is that Internet governance should mimic the structure of the Internet itself- borderless and open to all." Are we to understand that these are just words or is ICANN flying in the face of what the internet exists for, and why? I am sure, having watched The Richard Dimbleby Lecture given by Sir Tim Berners-Lee, that he would not be an advocate of what is proposed; neither would Vint Cerf! I implore you: stand by the words on your website; build policy for a better internet, a more secure internet; lobby ISPs and registrars to adopt technologies such as DNSSEC and IPv6; embrace the community that is the internet. However, it must be done in the spirit and for the greater good of the internet, and for for corporate greed or self-gain. Yours sincerely, Duncan Robertson

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No no no no no no no
by Don Rutledge Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

aaaaaaAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!! Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this Please don't do this. SINCERELY, EVERYBODY

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Becky Marshall Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

It’s vitally important that the internet remain a democratic environment open to all. Conducting meetings in secret in order to essentially create a monopoly with unlimited price increases and control limits the freedom of information and the ability for all to participate. Such exclusionary tactics are detrimental beyond scope. I realize when it comes to money and power, it is difficult to sway people to do the right thing for all rather than an elite few. There is enough money to be made off the internet, do not destroy it and limit its abilities by raising prices and centralizing control. I am opposed to these proposed changes. Thank you, Becky

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] proposed price increase to .com domains
by Rob van Zoelen Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Rob van Zoelen Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] price increases
by w welper Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am opposed to these price increase on the grounds that it restricts entrepreneurs ability to enter the business world. This will be another hurtle that has to be overcome by those of lesser means. Wendell Welper www.ezbair.com What are you breathing? 248-437-4844 FREE hygrometer upon request

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't sell out the internet!
by Lionel Fusco Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please keep the internet available to the people, and not a private domain for the rich to exploit the rest of us!!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't let the .com become a luxury!
by Hernan Gauna Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please do not increase domain purchase prices
by Maximilian Eyle Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Accessibility to the internet is not just about visiting websites, it is also about easily publishing one’s own content. If prices rise, countless projects and initiatives that are already strained by budget limitations will disappear. It would be a mistake to exacerbate the price barrier to internet use. Please do not pass this measure. Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increase
by Amine TIJ Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I would like to voice my opposition to Proposed Amendment 3. I believe that the global DNS registration system should be run primarily as a public concern. The only entities that stand to benefit from the proposed arrangement are verisign itself, at the expense of the public. These price hikes will impact the millions of small, independent businesses and developers that rely on the system as is to make their livelihood. Further, this could prove yet another point of pressure that convinces a small business to make their online presence exclusively in the Facebook walled garden and eschew the web itself. The web, and global DNS, were envisioned to be run for the public good, and they SHOULD be run for the public good. Deals such as this are an abdication of that mandate; short sighted profit chasing at the expense of all else. Please do not adopt this proposal.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Domain - ICANN - Verisign deal
by Jay Moulton Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Your proposed deal with Verisign is a transparent attempt to gouge and prey upon consumers in your .com monopoly. With the strong growth that the domain name market has experienced over the past two decades, you should be ensuring that consumers are realizing lower prices, not higher prices. I have written four books on micro and macroeconomics and can assure you that your actions are indeed the predatory actions of a monopolistic organization that is not defending stakeholder interests. Jay Moulton <http://sixforces.com> Jay Moulton, President Phone: (514) 945-9543

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price increases.
by Stefan S Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

It would be irresponsible and unfair to make the internet less accessible to all. It’s a website not an apartment.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I Object the Domain Price Increase
by Momobiz Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I don't agree with the price increase in domain prices!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Petition against .com pricing increase
by myhechar Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Icann, The use of internet has grown tremendously over the years because of affordable domain prices. the rumors we hear that you are planning to increase the domain prices, is not good for us. Please stop this price increase. Ken

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] How dare you continue on the road to this deal which will impact hundreds of thousands of small businesses?!
by rapan＠aol.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The FCC should not let this change go forward. Rena Panush, small business owner with several domain names which i pay for annually.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No no no
by Wes Brown Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please do not do this.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Price Increases
by Stephanie K Cree Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I want to strongly discourage you from moving forward with Proposed Amendment 3. .COM makes up 73% of all gTLD domain names, and increasing prices for those domain names affects more people than any other. I personally use a .COM domain name, and while increasing prices may not have an impact on large companies, it very much hurts individuals and people with small businesses like myself. Having a .COM domain name makes small businesses seem more legitimate and appeals more to customers. This can often help them get off the ground compared to other domain names. With price increases, many small businesses will no longer be able to afford a .COM domain name. You are effectively limiting small businesses and individuals' ability to operate on the internet. Best, Stephanie Cree

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Recent Decision
by Brian Yount Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello ICANN representative, As a consumer actively engaged within the online community the recent decision made by ICANN without consulting public opinion is outrageous and ignorant. The drastic changes you proposed affect consumers, businesses, and diverse communities. Corruption occurs when decisions are made behind close doors, with private interest and greed as the driving mechanisms for such decisions. The 21st-century should not be flagged as a continuous power trip but an ever changing landscape for democracy. I urge you to change the course of the ship you are charting. Sincerely, Marissa Fornaro

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] public comment
by heather Caves Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a .com owner and, I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified and the average price of managing the infrastructure must certainly be diminishing over time... Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry - it has ABSOLUTELY no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public - not corporate greed or profit. Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increases
by Michael H Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

We will all switch away from dot com addresses if you increase the price too much. There are a million alternatives, and they are already starting to look more appealing. Don't shoot yourself in the foot with this decision. Michael Higbee King County PC Repair ⁣Get BlueMail for Android

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Pricing agreement between ICANN and Verisign
by Frederico Mesquita Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sirs, As a provider, Verisign has a monopoly over the attribution of the .COM domains. The agreement between ICANN and Verisign wasn't made openly and does not guarantee the freedom of use and the competitivity of the Internet for all users. The price of a domain matters when setting up a website and many small business owners or entrepreneurs who wish to set up an online business or presence, or the user who wants to create a new website to display or promote whatever he wishes to, will be prevented to do so if this agreement goes on. So, as an user of website domains, I ask you to not make that deal with Verisign and leave things as they are because it will ultimately impact very negatively the internet, its use and its freedom. Thank you for your time, Frederico Mesquita

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] . Com price increases: the implications in my local business
by Herbert Vargas Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

As a user of ".com" domain I'm strongly disagree and very disappointed in the way you took a decision like the unjustified price increase without considering any input from Internet users on these critical decisions. In my case for example I'm an owner of a small local e-commerce in Colombia South America. All my customers doesn't have the same buying power as the ones in developed countries like USA. If I increase my prices reflecting your new policy, I won't be competitive in my market. For this reason I will have no choice than close my business and stop using my domain. I hope you understand and put a second thought into the repercussions of this new policy in small business around the world like the mine. Sincerely, Herbert vargas

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Bad Idea to Raise .com Prices
by Alex Vance Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I think raising the prices on the .com domains will raise the barrier to entry for those who want to create websites, which I think is a bad idea.

1 0