- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Really??
by CynthiaFernandes Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi! I am absolutely mortified to hear about this unfair change to the prices of .com domains, especially, without any input from us customers in this day and age of full access to consumers via multiple technological platforms. I would urge you to reconsider this decision that can hurt many of us and do the right thing. Thank you, Cynthia

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Tino Myllyselkä Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Tino Myllyselkä Helsinki, Uusimaa Finland

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please do not increase the price of .com's
by DEBBIE ST GEORGE Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please do not increase the price of .com's As a senior citizen the income I receive is fixed. I have a lot of .com's and it will be hard for seniors to keep up with the rising costs of living as it is. Thanks, Deb St. George debstgeorge(a)comcast.net On January 3, 2020, ICANN announced significant changes to the contract it has with Verisign, Inc. to operate the top-level domain .COM. ICANN and Verisign made these changes in secret, without consulting or incorporating feedback from the ICANN community or Internet users. Although ICANN has a history of making similar deals behind closed doors, and also of ignoring unified opposition against such action https://www.namecheap.com/blog/ensuring-icann-keep-domain-prices-in-check/ , Namecheap will continue to lead the fight against price increases that will harm our customers and the Internet as a whole. (For more information about Namecheap’s efforts to maintain domain name price controls, visit http://pricecaps.org/ .)

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] don't increase the prices
by Оксана Девочкина Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, i don’t want u to increase the prices on .com because for an eastern block it’s already too high and i’ll better just switch to .hu/.ru or others. Thank you Regards, Oksana Devochkina, the artist devochkina.com <http://devochkina.com/> curator of Kunstfuck Art Residency <http://kunstfuck.tilda.ws/> +36202139176

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Camments for amendment period
by Apt Applications Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, my name is David and I want to join the petiition against the .com domain increase. I am a small business owner Normally when these talks and agreements happen the public has little to no say. They happen behind closed doors almost like an aristocracy. Unfortunately, that leaves prices more expensive for everyone and it just never ends. The .com wholesale price could go over 70% over the next decade which can make it way harder for a consumer or a small business owner to afford domains. I know it's easy to take look at a 20M dollar check from a partnered company and get excited but please consider how this will affect everyone (not just in the usa). I know people in Mexico that can barely afford the domain prices as they are. Please consider the public opinion and needs on this matter. I for one think you should not move forward with this .com price increase Sincerely, David

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN nw .com policy is not accepted.
by Mohammad Khamis Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN nw .com policy is not accepted.
by Mohammad Khamis Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the Proposed Amendment
by Krasimir Angelov Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear reader, I am writing to express my disapproval of the proposed amendment. It will negatively impact the prices and the internet community. Kind regards, Krasimir Angelov

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increase
by John Holder Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I disagree with increasing the price beyond the rate of US inflation.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Changes
by peter malone Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

These proposed changes will hurt small startup businesses who have limited capital. Please reconsider these changes and work towards making domain registrations affordable for the underserved communities of the world. Thanks, Peter Malone Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] This will Drive many Small businesses of the radars of customers
by MH official Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Comments Manager, I would like to keep my Webpage for a small local photographer in the internet to be able to attract users that are using mobile devices it is the only chance to get new customers. I am already paying a good amount for my domain and if the price increases I would not be able to hold on to my .com Domain. Without a .com domain I would not be visible on the international market the way I am now. Please think of the small people before you make a decision that will take away from the ones that are struggling anyway. Thank you in advance.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against Verisign managing an raises prices of .com addresses
by Merlin Roe Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a .com registrant and am associated with the secondary market. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign wants increases in .COM prices. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry, it has no business dictating the price - and already makes profits at current price levels in excess of the operating needs to maintain a registry. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. The public has a vested interest in reasonably priced domain registrations to foster innovation on the internet and allow the individuals to maintain a presence on the web. Merlin Roe

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price increases
by Shirley Brooks Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, I'm protesting your recent changes in contract you've made in secret with Verisign, Inc. regarding the .COM top-level-dimain (TLD) that will cause huge price increases to all those who have a .COM address. These were made without consulting any of the public or those of us who have a .COM address and is completely devoid of any integrity, not to mention transparency. You are supposed to protect the public from deals such as this. You are a regulatory body, but this deal was conducted in secret. This should be illegal. Why was this 'deal' that affects millions made in secret, instead of involving the internet community? All I can think of is because you are greedy and indeed want to take advantage of a basically no regulated industry. I for one will work to try to stop the price increases that be will indeed implemented because of your secret deal, and contact will those responsible to oppose this and look into this much closer and expose your actions. I will also now look into changing my .COM to another address and rally others to do the same. Sincerely, Shirley Brooks

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Mr. Sunny Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I do not agree to the price hikes.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains.
by Tara Fatehi Irani Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name which I use for art and culture purposes. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Giving one company the power to dictate the price for a vast number of people is unjust. This price change will increase corruption and lead to many individuals and small companies working hard on cultural, social and environmental causes to loose their platform for communication and disappear from the internet. Many won't be able to afford the proposed upcoming prices. Please defend the rights of people not the greedy corporations. The monopoly that is being offered to a single company out of the pocket of many individuals is dangerous and offensive. Tara Fatehi London, UK

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Tunde Sanusi (Tuham) Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I voice against the biased increasement in .Com prices

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] <no subject>
by Mock Yong-Jie Aidan Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I believe that allowing domain name prices for .com websites to rise 8 out of 10 years is patently wrong. Also it appears to be a very self-beneficial situation as ICANN receives 20 million dollars in exchange for allowing Verisign to increase prices. This seems patently wrong and appears to be a move for profiteering. Change this please! Aidan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Prices on .com domains
by moh.i7san＠gmail.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

We understand that world is changing, but would you please keep the rates on .com domains as is.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase of .Com
by socialsbest Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am so disappointed Increaing prices is so bad مُرسل من هاتف Huawei الخاص بي

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Amendment 3 Opposition
by Han Solo Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, My registrar has made me aware of your planned Amendment 3, which is an agreement between ICANN and Verisign to effectively increase .COM domain prices each year for the next eight years. This agreement is the second occasion where ICANN has ignored consultation with all stakeholders for finanical gain. I agree with my registrar that such changes should involve the input of all stakeholders; especially since there are also supposedly unrelated inward investment from Verisign that has all the hallmarks of corruption. As such, I oppse the amendment. Yours faithfully, Robin BrownLondon, UK

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Haydn Bowley Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sirs, Since starting my web company aged 14 from bedroom in the UK, having being inspired by founder and visionaries of the web, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, I’ve always loved the freedom and accessibility the web has given to everyone. Going ahead with the proposed amendment is likely to reduce the affordability and accessibility of domain names, which would be a great shame to the next-generation who are looking up to big organisations like yourself, to do what’s right and fair to all. Your sincerely, Haydn Bowley

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Strongly against this
by Shear Mohammed Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

You shouldn’t do the price increase on .com. The entire internet community is against this. We need the internet to be cheap and accessible!! Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increase
by Kenneth Fields Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Increasing .com domain prices will both negatively impact existing businesses as well as new ones. Making .com domains less accessible and more expensive for everybody doesn’t make good business sense

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Changes
by Kevin Saylor Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To whom it may concern, It is becoming increasingly troubling that ICANN continues to make and allow changes to core TLDs like .com and .org which do not appear to be in the best interests of either consumers or operators. Both TLDs are bedrocks of the current domain infrastructure and changes to them, that will drive prices up, will only serve to weaken their position--and end up decreasing their worth to operators who have invested time and effort into making sure that their web properties are well presented. I understand the delicate that ICANN may find itself in due to monetary pressures, but perhaps it will be time for us to begin supporting government intervention in this arena. It would be a shame to ruin the independence that currently exists, but perhaps that will be the only way to ensure protections from price increases for domain owners. Please reconsider your position in the interests of all net citizens. Sincerely, -- Kevin Saylor, Jr. kevin(a)kevinsaylor.me (336) 701-2897

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don’t let .com price rising! Please stop it
by Bing zhang Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

ICANN Allows .COM Price Increases 发自我的 iPad

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Small Business Owner Comment - Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Andrew Boggeri Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN Board of Directors, Thank you for your continued service and work to support a free and open internet. ICANN is a large part of why the internet is today a massive engine for global commerce and information sharing, which has helped to lift millions out of poverty. The role of the BoD at ICANN shares in the responsibility for this great achievement. I'm writing to you today to share my thoughts on the proposed Amendment 3 of the .COM Registry Agreement which will directly affect the continued success of ICANN and the internet as an engine of global growth. In short, I am concerned about the magnitude of the price increases allowed to Verisign as well as the conflicts of interest that will arrive when Verisign is allowed to operate as a Registrar. I hope that you will take time from your busy schedules to consider my comment. I am roughly the same age as the public internet. I've seen it grow from a novelty piggybacking on traditional media (remember AOL discs?) to the dominant mode of information-sharing and communication in the world today. In the same time period, untold amounts of wealth have been created by some of the most unlikely people thanks to free or low-cost access to the internet and associated tools to create a website on it. As a personal user of the internet, I enjoy the immense amount of websites and information created by passionate users of the internet. These are all available to me for free thanks to the ease and low-cost of registering an internet domain name. I also operate a few websites, one of which is primarily internet-based and aimed at revenue generation. As a person with a start-up internet business, the low cost of registering and maintaining a .COM domain has been a key factor in my pursuit of this business. It is not unreasonable for Verisign to increase prices as their ongoing operating costs may change. However, their role in the .COM infrastructure does not in my opinion warrant the increases in the Proposed Amendment 3. These price increases are in fact likely to have an extremely deleterious effect and could very likely lead to static or decreased revenue for Verisign: if the price increases in the amendment are implemented .COM registrations will drop precipitously. Not only will this potentially affect Verisign, but the industry of registrars and companies who provide value-added services would see a major drop. I urge you to also consider the implications for global development; many low- and middle-income countries are projected to "come online" within the next 10 years. With the centrality of ICT to the development plans of the UN SDGs and these countries, actions like major price increases could delay the development of ICT industries across the globe. As a second point, I would like the BoD to consider the conflict of interest in allowing Verisign to operate as a registrar. Without proper constraints and auditing, what is to prevent Verisign from acting in a way that is contrary to the best interests of a vibrant and diverse internet registration and service economy? Enabling Verisign to operate as a monopoly not only violates the founding principles of the internet, but would likely lead to legal challenges from various countries. Finally, I would urge the board to take seriously the comments from people like me. We are highly engaged in the daily operation of the internet as a platform for global communication and trade and want to see the internet continue to grow. I think that many of us think that some level of price increases are reasonable, but what is currently proposed is excessive. We also want to engage constructively with ICANN and other stakeholders in this process. We hope to see transparency from Verisign, ICANN, and others in the negotiations as well as the compensation for changes in the structure of the internet. Thank you for your time and consideration. Andrew ᐧ

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] The current price is high enough!
by DS Fwd emails Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Maybe to you people, the price for .COM domain names is not high enough, but to us down here (Nigeria), $12 USD is like =N=4800 (Nigeria Naira), & that's not something small & not something we would like you to add to. Regards, Sam

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Enofe Enabulele Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please stop the .com price increase.
by LeanTech Creative Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Sent from my iPhone

1 0

Re: [Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mervin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, Am against any price increase for .COM domains. For the following reasons; First, the proposed changes are repressive and oppressive especially coming in an era where internet has become a driving force for the next industrial revolution. All stakeholders should first and foremost be consulted including us and our opinions taken into consideration. We all thought and are of the opinion that .COM domain prices should remain relatively available and cheap as this makes it more competitive. Comparing it with .NET and .ORG, these TLDs are very competitive and are used by great brands including me. Increasing the price of one will force the prices of the others to go up and this will make it more expensive to invest in internet by users and the public. As a developer and operating an IT company dealing with hosting, domains etc, this will hurt and affect our business negatively. It’s better and has always worked when there’s bulk selling rather than just making a few sales with expensive prices. Since your target market is business, give them and us the opportunity to keep our expenses low. Raising the price will not only increase our expenses but will adversely affect the buying of .COM domains and in turn the money you are seeking to raise will be NOT be found. People will seek alternatives and will definitely leave .COM to those who can afford which will not have served your purpose and vision for both ICANN and Verisign. Stop harming the internet both us and the users. We kindly ask you to forego the agreement and let the internet and .COM remain accessible and easier for all of us. Am sure, ICANN can raise that money through other means including donors and voluntary contributions rather than targeting THE MOST IMPORTANT AND USED .COM DOMAIN. There are so many other cctlds and gltds that ICANN can look into raising that amount of money. Regards, Mervin G. TEL: +254 707 043 488 Email: mervin(a)alphawonders.com Website: https://alphawonders.com Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Pirates
by Enrique Buzón Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

ICANN and Verisign are pirates

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ivan Adam Vari Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To Whom it May Concern: I am .COM domain owner. I am firmly against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices, and the current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Regards, I Vari

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increase comment
by alberto＠albertonodale.com alberto＠albertonodale.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Poomjit Sirawongprasert Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

FYI, I'm from the developing country all increasing price impacts to our cost of living, makes it more struggle to survive. I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Poomjit Sirawongprasert Bangkok, Thailand

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Aigars Matulis Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi there, Your are making .COM domains less accessible and more expensive for everybody. Stop it. Kind regards, Aigars Matulis

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Do not change .com prices
by Gus Fune Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am against it. You should check with the public before making these changes -------- Gus Fune

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Reg - the amendment
by Karthi Keyan Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN The change seems not well thought out and this will have a significant impact. It is unfair to Verisign finalize the price and increase the price. I hope you will think through this completely before act on it. Regards Karthikeyan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increase
by Alex Hart Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I operate several .com domains for business and personal use. Any price increase will make it more difficult to maintain these projects. Please do not increase fees for these domains. Thanks. -- Alex

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increase
by Andrew Griffiths Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I'm against the move to increase the price of .com domains.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Marco Amoedo Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments to the proposed amendment to the .COM registry agreement. I am the registrant of a few .COM domains and I provide consultancy on the online services and software space. Considering the origin of the price increases that have made their way into many registry agreements, I'm opposing any potential price increases, especially for .COM. The increases were originally allowed due an out of court settlement between ICANN and Verisign, that was decided without any community input and should have been time limited. Being quite technical myself, I do not see any obvious reason for the cost to run the registry and the DNS servers to increase. Technology gets cheaper in scale and the number of registrations is still increasing. Many other potential operators have made credible statements(and bids) that show that the registry can be run at a lower price. Thus, the rate should remain fixed at $7.85, or even be lowered. As a public company, Verisign's biggest obligation is to their shareholders, which means they need to increase their profit as much as possible. This does not align with the interest of the community and stakeholders in the ICANN process. ICANN's goal is to keep the internet technically stable, this is not done by granting arbitrary price increases.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Digital Tech Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a domainer (I invest in domain names as a business). I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Jean Col paris france Provenance : Courrier<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> pour Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Pricing of .com domains
by Richard Toth Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

------------------------------ I am a registrant of several .com domain names. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. An increase in .com prices would detrimentally hurt my business. Richard Toth

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please do not increase the cost of domain names
by best funny Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Please do not increase the cost of domain names. There is no stopping it once this happens and it will become expensive those those of us who renew multiple domain names per year Provenance : Courrier<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> pour Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Andy Martin Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Team, As an internet user and .com owner, I am deeply disturbed by this proposal. The fact that ICANN will enter into an arrangement under which, a second party will be given permission to increase prices whenever they want for the .COM domain and ICANN will receive $20m from that party is scandalous and smacks deeply of corporate corruption. The fact that two companies get to decide this outcome is a disgrace. In my opinion, this should be decided by an independent review body with time for public consultation after the review bodies recommendations, through an organisation like Change.org or similar. At least that way, hundreds of millions of internet users both private and business would have some say in the outcome. Non Profit organisations should not be making a profit from public good, this looks deeply unethical from ICANN. From the outset you have argued that DNS is a public service for good. Lastly, why do you need a third party in all of this? Why cannot ICANN receive these payments directly and transparently, if you need to raise funds? This feels a bit like your .COM users are being used as cash cows without any say in the matter, in effect a stealth tax! Perhaps it's time to review how you plan to do this in a more balanced and less dictatorial way. Kind regards Andy Martin

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Registry Agreement
by trybetech18＠gmail.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN & Verizon, My message will be brief and direct. Net neutrality failed and so will your selfish motives on the subject matter. Perplexed Engineer, Tega Evwerhamre Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Aaron Gregg Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Owner of several .com domains, and several on other TLDs, used for business, community, and personal purposes. The current rate on .com is already inflated, and would be benefit from competition outside of Verisign. If ICANN allow Verisign to further squeeze their customers who're subject to their monopoly, then they're no longer representative of public interest. Large companies will of course find no issue with the extra expenditure, but the Internet and those who have .com domains is a lot more expansive than those large companies. Aaron Gregg Coleraine, Northern Ireland / Harstad, Norway

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the proposal to raise .com prices
by Emanuele Trovato Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I would like to express my opinion against the proposal to raise the price of the .com domains. Kind Regards, [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/skyteam.png] Emanuele Trovato Project Manager M +31 6 19304741 emanuele.trovato(a)skyteam.com<mailto:emanuele.trovato@skyteam.com> http://www.skyteam.com<http://www.skyteam.com/> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/facebook.png]<https://www.facebook.com/skyteam> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/twitter.png]<https://twitter.com/skyteam> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/linkedin-sign.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/skyteam> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/Youtube.png]<https://www.youtube.com/user/skyteam> [http://services.staging.skyteam.com/images/signature/wechat.png]<http://www.skyteam.com/en/about/social-media/> This message and its attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others, as any of these actions are strictly prohibited; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.

2 1

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] subida domino .com
by layla Skye Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

No estoy de acuerdo en que subáis los precios de dominio .COM y crecer en más de un 70% por encima de los precios actuales en la próxima década. Por favor replantéenselo. Un saludo Enviado desde Correo<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> para Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] This amendment stifles entrepreneurs
by James Meek Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against the new law
by Sirius Softwares Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This is unfair. Please don't let it happen.

1 0