- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment
by David Ferreira Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I am here to manifest my disagreement with the price raise for the .com domains. Instead, I believe you should make the .com domains more restrictive to buyers, by disallowing for instance parked domains or unused domains (unless there is a global trademark involved ofc). Thanks David Ferreira +31644014117 (Whatsapp <https://wa.me/31644014117>)

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] This is not supported by the majority of the public
by Lauri L Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

People will not be happy If this passes and you should listen to the consumers.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] The internet is for users - don't increase the .com price
by Heiko Narrog Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

A price increase affects the whole community of internet users, especially those who create and provide content. Increasing prices on the .com domain punishes the plurality of small users and content providers who publish on a budget. This is not a decision to be made behind closed doors with the commercial interest of just one or two companies. Please include actually affected parties in the decision making process, and keep prices low, to maintain plurality of voices on the internet. Heiko Narrog Sendai, Japan

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop it
by Babar Ali Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Totally dissapointed to see this bad news. Dont kill internet with your greed. If you increase the .com domain prices you will eventually let people say bye to the internet. Specially small marketers and bloggers like me.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Domain Prices
by jake kali Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi- Please dont destroy cheap domain priced. Thanks, Jake

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increases
by Joe Adams Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, I accept that sometimes prices have to increase but unless you can justify the proposed increases it feels totally unreasonable. Explain why and the long term plans for any extra cash generated and think again. Regards, Joe(a)cantbarsed.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Michael Deatherage Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I do NOT support this closed door deal to increase prices, which will further consolidate the power of the internet in fewer hands. This maneuver is at odds with the spirit of the internet. A consequence of this action might be regulatory oversight because if you won't listen, maybe our representatives will.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Silver Kuklase Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I oppose the changes. There is no value being added, just price increase for reasons of greed to take more money for the same service.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Dan Bolser Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Yo yo yo, I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Dan Bolser Hinxton

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] concern re amendment 3
by Ming Tsai Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, We are very concerned that there will be major changes to how .com domains are distributed and at what cost. This has global effects and yet only icann with verisign has negotiated this amendment without any transparency. As far as we can tell, this will create more expensive domain names which will unfairly disadvantage the poor and create uneven access to the internet. We oppose this amendment. Ming Tsai

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ashwin Shahapurkar Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. ashwin shahapurkar India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop ruin .com domains
by Adw Heroes Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi! Stop ruin .com domains! I completely agree with the points in this post https://www.namecheap.com/blog/icann-allows-com-price-increases-gets-more-m… (https://link.getmailspring.com/link/4458CEC5-7E8D-4498-A8B5-3EE0F4024335@ge…)

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Matthew Lilley Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sir/Madam, >From what I understand the proposed changes will mean that .COM wholesale domain prices can grow by more than 70% over and above current prices over the next decade. The contract also allows for other price increases, which could drive prices up further, ultimately making .COM domains less accessible and more expensive for everybody. Alongside these contract changes, I understand that Verisign has agreed to pay ICANN an additional $20 million dollars over five years to support ICANN's domain name system initiatives, without any clarity about how ICANN will spend the money, or who will ensure that the funds are properly spent on domain infrastructure. Overall, it doesn't sound like a good deal for consumers but instead a good deal for Verisign and ICANN. Yours faithfully, Matthew Lilley ------------------------------ *My PGP Public Key Identity* pub 2048R/*76552385* 2018-03-20 [expires: 2020-07-31] Key fingerprint = *1EB5 F55E 6C5E 5A90 7732 8EBB 5E72 058C 7655 2385* uid Matthew Lilley <m.k.lilley(a)gmail.com> sub 2048R/0C7A597A 2018-03-20 Public key available to download from here <https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=m.k.lilley%40gmail.com> ------------------------------

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't raise the proce of TLD
by bzargui jihade Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello we have heard that icann is about to raise the price of TLD we hope that you not raise the price think about all the populations in the world. The price of tld is already high please stop this action

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ridiculous
by Jonathan Greenwood Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi, Just heard about the icann's relationship and new deal with Verisign. Sounds like monopoly maffia. Internet is for everyone, not the few who can afford it. Make your proposals open and discuss with other parties who may be in a better position to offer help and even take over Verisign's current position. Regards, Jonathan Greenwood m: +44 7507324014

1 0

Re: [Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Chad Fullerton Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN stakeholders, I own many .com domain names and I am against Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement in its current form. While I am not opposed to a price increase every 3-6 years in order to cover increased costs due to maintaining infrastructure, a 7% increase cap is too high. 28% cost increase every six years is unreasonable. It should be lowered to something more reasonable between 2-3% every few years (unless Verisign can justify otherwise needing the funds). Any increases need to be substantiated with costs detailed specifically for the public to see why such an increase is taking place. How did Verisign come to conclude that this level of increase is acceptable to the .com owners without consulting the public first? What specifically are the "security, stability and resiliency enhancements" that Verisign claims the increase is necessary for? In the ICANN press release dated January 3, 2020, you state that "ICANN is not a price regulator", and that you defer to the Department of Commerce for the "regulation of pricing for .COM registry services", yet this Proposed Amendment appears to be strictly about pricing. It is strange to me that you're making a decision about price changes while also stating you don't regulate pricing. If you don't deal with pricing changes, then shouldn't ICANN dismiss this amendment request and instead have the Department of Commerce make the final decision and consult the public in their own process? It is also being reported that ICANN is receiving $20 million dollars over five years from Verisign with no explanation why they are all of a sudden giving this money to ICANN or what it is to be used for. If this is true, the optics of the situation look really bad to the public. It makes it appear Verisign paid to get rules passed through ICANN that only benefited themselves. Verisign has a monopoly over .COM wholesale pricing, they give ICANN $20 million and at the same time try to push through an amendment to let them increase prices upwards of 28% every 6 years. It comes across as a corrupt system. The timing is very suspect. Price increases are a big deal to the average individual and small business owner. The .COM TLD is universally recognized. It isn't one that is purely used by commercial entities. Individuals purchase .COM domains for personal use as well. Small increases in the cost may not seem like a lot to large companies, but for individuals and small businesses - especially if they have many .COM domains to secure and renew each year - every increase is compounded and adds up to be a lot. Please find a common ground and fair balance between the demands of Verisign, and what the owners of .COM domains are voicing opinions about this proposed change. I hope when making this very important decision about the .COM TLD that you read all comments and take them seriously into consideration. Thank you, Regards, Chad

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Do not increase fees!
by luisa vieira Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a woman entrepreneur opening my small business, as a way to escape unemployment. Starting with little money, every expense is important for me. Increasing anual fees at this pace will make it impossible for small businesses like mine to prosper, specially at their beginning. Please do not do this. Luisa Bogéa Low Impact Box - Solutions to decrease your environmental impact CEO and founder lowimpactbox.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Remove amendment 3
by Eric Park Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

ICANN, please allow the Internet to continue to function as an open platform. The suggested changes through amendment 3 is going to be disastrous for new domain purchasers and old domain holders alike. Price increases would mean having a domain may no longer be feasible for some. Please do not go through with amendment 3 and help the Internet stay as an open platform. Thank you! - Eric

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com is a backbone of the internet - prices need to be kept at a minimum
by Reece Neumann Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

The .com TLD is the most well known domain name and to many is the only domain name that they will have heard of making .com and the internet synonymous with each other. As such .com can be considered a backbone of the internet and therefore must be safeguarded in the interest of all users. The price of the .com should be kept as low as possible in order to allow as many individuals as possible to continue to innovate and keep the internet as free flowing as possible. A significant increase in the price of .com could result in individuals choosing not to buy a domain where they otherwise would have took the chance, and therefore not contribute their project to world wide web. As such this has a real potential to lower innovation across the internet and thus ultimately contribute towards stifling competition. This goes against the nature of the internet as a whole and must be avoided. Therefore I would suggest that the price of the .com domain name be made as low as is possible as to allow it to function and no more. Profits should not be the main factor in running this important internet backbone component. As .com can be considered crucial to a thriving current day internet, it should be the primary domain that is protected from price rises and in doing so will help all those who wish to use, innovate and advance the internet further. Kind regards, Reece Neumann

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Against .COM Price Increases
by harry mochi Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am against .COM Price Increases. Owning domains became the de facto standard nowadays, so it should be easy and economical to access to owning domains for even low income people.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Verisign decision is crap
by Godspeed Corp Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

You should be ashamed of your business antics considering how much it will provide a devastating blow to so many other businesses that rely on your services. Benjamin Lord Godspeed Marketing - Founder Mobile: 716-Network Int'l Mobile: 727-369-6991 Skype: Benjamin.lord9091 iPhone. iTypos. iApologize.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Do you understand .org?
by NIck Hutchins Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

As a .org and arguably the group that should be most aware of its purpose, I am extremely disappointed, that you are not only willing to accept what is basically a bribe, but will in turn pass this cost on to everyone else. It supposed to be for the people, and as a public body / NFP, this should be bloody obvious. Collaborating with a for profit company, even if they already control the TLD is sick. Accepting money to look the other way is not cool, in anyones book. Nicholas

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increase
by Egor Gromyko Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, This should not have happened. If there is something about the domain infrastructure that needs urgent maintenance, there is nothing that prevents you from at least clarifying the details of why the price increase is so urgent. Do not make it look like a money laundry. Roll back the deal, do the right thing. Kind regards, - EG

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Are you aware of the interests of millions of com domain owners!
by info＠t3concept.de Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I'm a com domain owner from Germany and got the news that ICANN forces increasing the price for com domains during the next ten years. I had the idea that ICANN is an organization to support the whole community of domain owners especially the com domain owners. I know there are many of com domain owners who are very angry about this and so am I. I beg you please to consider not let com domain prices increase in this way. That wouldn't be good in any way for a free and open web for everybody. Best regards Thomas Bügel T3CONCEPT web-solutions Thomas Bügel Ludwigstr. 120 70197 Stuttgart Germany fon +49.711.639119 fax +49.711.639126 eMail <mailto:info@t3concept.de> info(a)t3concept.de <http://www.t3concept.de/> www.t3concept.de

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Unnecessary price increases
by Rajko Radovic Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To whom it may concern, I do not feel that the steps being taken are crucial or warrant the inevitable price increase they will add to domain renewals. I propose the decision be reconsidered. Rajko Radovic

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Increase of .com
by RockyandRoxy Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I hear you are putting up the prices of .com domains This is not fair to us small businesses who already pay out a lot for marketing etc of our sites This will also discourage people from getting .com address and will look for alternatives If so then a change like that will affect our websites enormously if we have to change our domain names This is very sneaky and unfair I must object to this Also what will you be doing with all the extra money ???? Regards Donna Orme This email may contain confidential and legally privileged information. You must keep such information confidential, and must not disclose such information without our prior written consent. If you have received this email in error, you should let the sender know, and you must delete it from your computer system. We take reasonable care to ensure that our emails are not infected by any virus or other malicious software, but we do not guarantee this. Posh Promotions www.rockyandroxy.com Tel: 07767 420467 Tel: 0121 429 1028

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price Increases
by Yc Pang Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Ciaran Kendellen Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I would like to register my opposition to this amendment, a more robust and publicly scrutinizible process should be implemented instead. -- Ciarán Kendellen Chief Technology Officer Host Ireland Business Broadband | 6-9 Trinity Street, Dublin 2 | +353 1 8219350 www.hostireland.com <http://www.hostireland.com> *Business at the speed of light * Host Ireland Business Broadband, founded in 1998, offers exceptional enterprise grade wireless and fibre broadband services to Irish Businesses. Next day installation, enterprise grade SLA & broadband speeds of 1gbps are all part of our outstanding level of service. We genuinely care about our customers – should you need anything at all we are here for you 24/7/365. Why not call our Dublin based team on + 353 1 8219350 and see how we can help you. Host Ireland Business Broadband – Business at the speed of light

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increases on .com domains
by Eric (Nordkyn Design) Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear Sir, In our view, any price increase should first and foremost either reflect an actual increase in direct costs or be matched by an increase in the service level provided. In the present situation, the changes considered appear to be purely motivated by increasing profits and they have no tangible justification. As a result, we are fully opposed to these amendments. This is not an acceptable stance and such changes must be planned in consultation and agreement with the key stakeholders actually providing the DNS services to the domain name owners. Yours faithfully, Eric Bretscher Nordkyn Design NEW ZEALAND http://nordkyndesign.com/ This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete this message from your system without first printing or copying it. Any design or technical data contained in this email (including any attachments) must be handled in accordance with all applicable data protection laws.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN / Verisign
by MikeH Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

.>>> Verisign agreed to pay ICANN an additional $20 million dollars over five years to support ICANN's Smells suspiciously like a monopoly provider looking to engorge themselves at others expense. No doubt a sign of the political times. Money, secrecy, power. I'd imagine there's a US class action lawsuit against a monopoly provider waiting to happen.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Ammendment
by Sylvia Bressel Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This is so typical: show the money and see the bad: there is no need to agree to an unlimited price raising over decades, burden on our shoulders, the users! As many other said: not all .coms are billion dollar businesses, a good portion are self-employed and small businesses. And its even more questionable to do this in secret without letting your already registered users and buyers know about - I heard today the first time and in 3 days the comment section will be closed!! So you want to keep us quiet, right? FORGET ABOUT!!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I do not agree
by mustapha ait el haj Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This increase is not fair, the re-seller are already buying all available .com domains and Now they have an extra reason to increase the prices over and over again

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Abuzar Tariq Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN Team I strongly oppose the Proposed Amendment 3 to the.COM Registry Agreement on increasing the price of .com domain TLDs. Thanks -- Best Regards, Abuzar Tariq

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Disgusted at potential price rise
by Daniel Neville Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I’m disgusted that the price of domains would go up as a result of doing work with Verizon

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] dear icann
by Alex Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

eat shit and die

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Abolish ICANN and Break it to distributed non-centralized orgs throughout world.
by jitendra shah Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Addition to my former mail. I strongly believe that ICANN is failing to respect and maintain the freedom of internet, I would prefer an alternate Distributed authority which has no centralized control with any government, All distributed nodes must be ran by non-profit anonymous donation backed organizations with strong community driven hierarchy. So none can directly influence his/her position directly in organization by money, lobbying or government support. **************ICANN Should be broken and Monopoly must not exist.************ I use the Internet but I am not a .com registrant. Surat, Gujarat India

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Neil Bosley Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I totally oppose to the raising of .com prices. It makes absolutely no sense. If anything, technology costs are decreasing. Verisign and ICaan have simply seen an 'opportunity' to capitalize on the current market in domains and should NOT be allowed!!! Regards NB

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Keep price reasonable versus rising popularity of alternatives
by k00nq2+9vl7srqckdarw＠guerrillamail.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Dear ICANN, Verisign, I am against the proposed price inflation of the TLD .COM. In short: keep .COM price inflation reasonable for all parties, especially for your customers. Read the many good arguments in all the threads posted. If there is any reason to raise prices, such reasons need to be clarified towards customers and again, needs to be reasonable. However, keeping price inflation in check concerning the .COM TLD (or any gTLD and ccTLD for that matter) is also in your, the provider's, best interest. The more discontent customers get, to more reason you give them to create and use alternatives, which could be a serious threat to your business model in the long run. Alternatives already exist, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_DNS_root and more are being researched, e.g. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8291986 . Thank you for your consideration, Ben Hup --------------------- In reaction to: What's happening? Last month, ICANN, the organization that oversees domain names, announced significant changes to the contract it has with Verisign, Inc. who operate the .COM top-level-domain (TLD). ICANN made these changes in secret, without consulting or incorporating feedback from the ICANN community or Internet users. Although ICANN has a history of making similar deals behind closed doors, and also of ignoring unified opposition against such action, we are focused on leading the fight against price increases that will harm our customers (and the Internet as a whole). This is a crucial time to raise our voices given that .COM domains make up 40% of all registered domain names online. What does this change mean? Wholesale registries charge Namecheap a set fee per domain name per year. According to this new agreement, Verisign will be allowed to increase the wholesale price to registrars for .COM domains every year for 8 out of the next 10 years, and the increases don’t stop there. This will mean that .COM wholesale domain prices can grow by more than 70% over and above current prices over the next decade. The contract also allows for other price increases, which could drive prices up further, ultimately making .COM domains less accessible and more expensive for everybody. Why is ICANN doing this? Alongside these contract changes, Verisign agreed to pay ICANN an additional $20 million dollars over five years to support ICANN's domain name system initiatives, without any clarity about how ICANN will spend the money, or who will ensure that the funds are properly spent on domain infrastructure. ---- Sent using Guerrillamail.com Block or report abuse: https://www.guerrillamail.com//abuse/?a=Qk55CAgOV6dYiwG5vX8SdxrDQM%2BexpoDi…

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com rate increase
by Mitch Kennedy Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Transparency. Its what is needed here. Please be clear with supporters about how the funds frommverisgn will be used to improve our , your customers, experience. And why the rate increases are so large. Thank you Mitch Kennedy ND, CEM, LEED-AP,6SigmaBB

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] My opinion on the amendment
by Jan Scheiper Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, as a Computer Science student and owner of several .com domain, I am not in favor of this planned amendment. Since it allows a price hike for domains, which might render them unaffordable for students like me, I'd prefer to keep the rules as they are and figure out another way to improve security and the infrastructure, without massively increasing the prices. I hope my and other people's comment can sway the decision process away from the current form of this amendment, especially the article allowing an increase of the price. Regards, Jan Scheiper

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposed to proposed amendment 3 to the .COM registry agreement
by Alexandros Stavrinou Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am opposed to the proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. As an internet user and owner of multiple .COM domains I feel this change will threaten the open and accessible nature of the internet.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't agree
by marco.goncalves＠yahoo.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hardware, network and bandwidth is getting cheaper every year, and .com domains are getting expensive. Makes no sense at all in my point of view. Best Regards, Marco Gonçalves

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Domain Price Increase
by neoplayerscouk＠aol.com Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am disappointed to learn today that over the next 10 years we could see massive domain name price increases. It should be the case that domain names are accessible to everyone, by increasing the prices it could end up to a point where only large companies or organisations would be able to afford these making the domains hard to get for the normal folks out there that just have a dream. Please reconsider these proposals for the benefit of everyone and a healthy future in .com domain names.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mike P Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hi I am responding to protest in your proposed increase prices on domain names for the next 10 years. It does not make sense to do so as this will impede openness of the internet. Furthermore, keeping the price low for all website domains will allow for long term revenue for any registered domains everywhere. Regards, Mike

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Not happy about your decision ICANN and Verisign - leads to excessive .COM price increases
by Oreste Pompetti Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

This decision will mean I pay more for my domain name costs and you profit through a quiet deal with each other - ICANN and Verisign. Not happy. We know what you’re up too. Stop it and put people before selfish profiteering. Oreste Pompetti

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Shutting out small content producers
by Harry Twyford Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Hello, I’m writing about the proposed amendment 3 to the .COM Registry. I understand this amendment will permit Verisign to significantly raise prices on the sale of .COM domains. I am concerned that this move reflects the trend of small/independent Web producers being unable to compete with large firms. This moves raises prices for small producers and continues this shut-out process. I am disappointed that this amendment is being proposed and I urge ICANN to drop it. Best, Harry Twyford

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Prices of the dot com
by Ayelet Dekel Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

To open the prices for change when there is improvement of technology and the costs are getting lower and lower, Please act in full transparenty and let the public know about the costs per domain maintenance. David Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Price increase
by jliska＠onet.pl Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of a .com domain name. I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Justyna Liska Dublin, Ireland

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Elliott Mozley Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

I am a registrant of multiple .COM domain names.- I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. No one other than Verisign want increases in .COM prices. The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. Elliott Mozley London, United Kingdom

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN Changes
by Sara Dyson Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

If prices of domains are going to increase, I ask for full transparency of why the cost would be increased. Those of us whom own domains should understand exactly what is going on. At the end of the day, domains are arbitrary addresses with little overhead to manage so increasing their cost drastically seems unnecessary and driven only by greed. To prove I’m wrong, please be transparent in all changes made. Regards, Sara -- SD Web Development

1 0