While the internet is complex, mandating changes to the fundamental building block of the internet is a costly and difficult task. Simply reading the last page shows how out of touch this agreement is with realities. * Mandating a disclosure nobody will read and hackers will simply ignore will not make the internet safer. * Additionally, domain owners cannot necessarily control the content on their own site (e.g. social media, hosted subdomains like github) and certainly should not be penalized for unauthorized content without ample time to take down * Registrar operators are not aware of subdomains and cannot possibly police the misuse. * Browsers and search engines are already taking an active role in publishing malware sites with warnings blocking access. They are already crawling the internet and can take notice and act on a granular level rather than taking a sledgehammer to an entire domain. As such, I stand opposed to Amendment 3. Thanks, Moshe