[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
I appreciate this opportunity to provide comments to the proposed amendment to the .COM registry agreement. I am the registrant of .COM domains and expect to be affected by this decision. Considering the origin of the price increases that have made their way into many registry agreements, I'm opposing any potential price increases in this proposal. I do not see any reason to permit price increases. Declining costs for most of the associated technology and the rising number of registrations actually argues for a lower per-registration cost, rather than a higher one. Other potential operators have made credible statements (and bids) that show that the registry can be run at a lower price. As a public company, Verisign's biggest obligation is to their shareholders, which means they need to increase their profit as much as possible. This does not align with the interest of the community and stakeholders in the ICANN process. ICANN's goal is to keep the internet technically stable, this is not done by granting arbitrary price increases. Regards, Matthew Geiger Vigilist LLC
participants (1)
-
Matthew Geiger