February 2020 - Comments-draft-opplan-budget-fy21-25-20dec19

NCSG Comment
by Rafik Dammak Feb. 27, 2020

Feb. 27, 2020

Hi all, Please find attached NCSG comment. Best regards, Rafik

1 0

i2Coalition Public Comment on ICANN Budget
by Christian Dawson Feb. 26, 2020

Feb. 26, 2020

1 0

Submission of GAC Comments Regarding ICANN's Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan and Budget
by Robert Hoggarth Feb. 26, 2020

Feb. 26, 2020

On behalf of the GAC Chair, attached please find docx and pdf copies of the comments of the ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) on ICANN's “Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan and Budget”, published on 20 December 2019. Best regards, Robert Hoggarth --- Robert Hoggarth VP – Policy Development and GAC Relations Washington, D.C. +1 424 558 4805

1 0

RySG Comments on the Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget
by Demetriou, Samantha Feb. 26, 2020

Feb. 26, 2020

Hello, On behalf of the gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG), please find attached our comments on the Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget. We have attached a comment on the Plans as well as a separate comment on the Evolving ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model Work Plan contained in Appendix C. In the interest of time, we did not conduct a vote on these comments. We did discuss them on our mailing list and during a biweekly conference call, and no member opposed their submission. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Best, Samantha Demetriou RySG Vice Chair, Policy

1 0

GNSO Council Submission to Five Year Strategic & Operating Plan
by Berry Cobb Feb. 25, 2020

Feb. 25, 2020

ICANN Finance team, On behalf of the GNSO Council leadership, please find attached the GNSO Council’s comments related to ICANN’s Five Year Strategic and Operating Plan, including comments regarding the FY21 draft budget. Please advise if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you. B Berry Cobb @berrycobb GNSO Policy Consultant

1 0

Business Constituency (BC) comment on FY21-25 Op & Financial Plan and FY21 Op Plan & Budget
by Steve DelBianco Feb. 25, 2020

Feb. 25, 2020

Attached is the comment of ICANN’s Business Constituency (BC) regarding ICANN Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget. This comment was drafted by Jimson Olufuye, Mark Datysgeld, Adetola Sogbesan, and Arinola Akinyemi. It was approved in accord with our Charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice Chair for Policy Coordination ICANN Business Constituency (BC)

1 0

RrSG response to Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget
by Zoe Bonython Feb. 25, 2020

Feb. 25, 2020

Hello, On behalf of the Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG), I would like to submit the attached response to the Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget. Kind regards, Zoe Bonython RrSG Secretariat

1 0

Pending Ratification: ALAC Statement on Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget
by ICANN At-Large Staff Feb. 25, 2020

Feb. 25, 2020

Dear All, Please find attached the ALAC statement regarding Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget<https://community.icann.org/x/EQhxBw>. In the interest of time, the ALAC Chair requested that the statement be transmitted to the ICANN public comment process with a note that the statement is pending ALAC ratification. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget
by Dr Eberhard W Lisse Feb. 25, 2020

Feb. 25, 2020

Dear Ms Wattson, as the chair of the ccNSO's Technical Working Group and on behalf of the Wg I submit the enclosed Budget Request as comment to ICANN's Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget for consideration and approval. Please acknowledge receipt hereof by return email. greeting, el -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el(a)lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/

1 0

C. Langdon-Orr Personal Comments re FY21-FY25 Operating and Financial Plan
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Feb. 24, 2020

Feb. 24, 2020

Please find inline below and attache my personal comments' Firstly as a long-time active ICANN participant and reader of a long history of Operating and Financial Plans, let me note my gratitude and appreciation for the continued improvements in the accessibility of information/data and general readability over the last few years and specifically complement this current document which in my view allows for several ‘levels’ of reader enquiry into the important material and data contained within, in particular, improved cross-referencing and the use of 5 year and 1-year details. Secondly, I also note the overall conservative yet well-considered nature of the planned expenditure, from modest growth predictions, for these operational and strategic activities overall, (a reflection of course of the highly professional work of the team involved with the Plans development and production, however concerning Budget Çontingenecy provision, specifically for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures policy development process • Specific and Organizational Reviews • Policy development and compliance required by the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation • Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability Work Stream 2, all of which I admit I have a keen interest or involvement with, does give me slight I hope unfounded concern, that it may be too conservative and risk some diminution of possible progress or commitment to these activities as they come into play quite possible as processes and projects that overlap in time. Perhaps consideration or a higher provision percentage and then not exceeding expenditure being seen as good fiscal management would be a preferred approach, on these key/critical matters. This would have the added benefit of not risking as likely the need to as was required previously to ‘dip into the Reserve Funds to complete time-critical ICANN/Community activities. Regarding the Annexed Document "Evolving ICANN's Multistakeholder Model Work Plan:" my brief responses to the specific questions posed follow: 1. Are the right entities suggested to take the lead in developing an approach or solution to an identified issue? If not, which entity would be appropriate? - Yes, I believe they are, providing that each sees themselves as the convenor or prime facilitator of an ICANN Community-wide interactive process, that engages the ICANN.Org and relevant staff support.. 2. How can the ICANN community effectively coordinate the work of developing approaches and solutions? - Communication and opportunity for equitable input and interaction (a mix of Face to Face and intercessional work) will be key to this if it is going to be effective or successful within the ICANN-MSM model. Change is always resisted by some in any situation and experienced facilitators or change agents might also be a useful tool to deploy in various stage of these processes. 3. How should the six issues included in the work plan be prioritized? - As one of the Co-Chairs of ATRT3 that is going to make recommendations regarding prioritisation of Key ICANN Activities and Review Team/ CCWG etc., Recommendations to date, I would recommend that specifics of that proposal are applied to these six issues being triaged (sorted in order of action) But my personal view of matters to be addressed would be:- 1. 1st ICANN deal with #6 the delegation of Roles and Responsibilities, (ensuring wider ICANN Community ‘buy-in’; 2. 2nd #5 Precision Scoping (now that GNSO Council has Resolved adoption of PDP 3.0) it is essential to establish with the wider ICANN Community what their opinions/acceptance/reactions to the details of PDP3.0 is across the ACSOs, but also but the most fragile of many of our process plans in ICANN seems to me to be a problem with proper scoping of planned activities. It could be effective and efficient to also deal with #4 Complexity as an issue in parallel with the mater of Scoping. 3. 3rd #1 Consensus, Representatives and Inclusivity, may to some extent be a product of the success (or not) of the other Community interactions relating to the identified Issues. But this could be addressed in parallel to others identified. 4. #2 Prioritisation and Effective Use of Resources and #4 Culture Trust and Silos could be addressed as Overarching issues throughout a process that ques the other matter. <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_m…> Cheryl Langdon-Orr about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_m…>

1 0

ccNSO SOPC comments on the ICANN FY21-25 Operating and Financial Plan
by Giovanni Seppia Feb. 24, 2020

Feb. 24, 2020

Dear ICANN Finance, Please see attached the ccNSO SOPC comments on the ICANN FY21-25 Operating and Financial Plan. As ever, we remain available for any clarification you may need. Kind Regards, Giovanni Seppia [cid:image006.jpg@01D5EAEC.50D7D080]<http://www.eurid.eu/>Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager EURid vzw Telecomlaan 9, 1831 Diegem, Belgium T: +32 2 401 27 50 | M: +39 335 8141733 www.eurid.eu<http://www.eurid.eu/> RPR Brussel - VAT BE 0864.240.405 [cid:image003.jpg@01D4F6BF.C28BB830]<https://twitter.com/EUregistry> [cid:image004.jpg@01D4F6BF.C28BB830] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/eurid/> [cid:image005.jpg@01D4F6BF.C28BB830] <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> Disclaimer: This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer https://eurid.eu/en/other-infomation/privacy-policy

1 0

The budget of personal rh
by betty＠ipeos.com Feb. 18, 2020

Feb. 18, 2020

1 0

Comments
by Martin Atayo, Executive-in-Chief/ President Feb. 4, 2020

Feb. 4, 2020

ICANN Committee Team, I am respectfully submitting two suggestionsfor your review and possible adoption that gearto enhance a healthy, safe, and secure digital technology virtual world. The suggestions include: 1) Overhaul of existing third-party registration of ICANN membership with the objective of cancellation, and replacement with direct Domain registration and payment of reasonable and affordable fee into ICANN account thanallowing payment into third-party registration account. This is very necessary for security reasons and elimination of fraud.2) ICANN should introduce in its White papers, strategic security regulations and guidelines as security complexity changes by the day to most troubling online safety and credibility concern. ICANN should develop and make public at its level security and safety guidelines, all ofwhich are independent of IT services providing companies security and safety guidelines. We suggest ICANN may put up suggestions like this to the global public for open discourse,dialogue, and refinement prior to final generally accepted statement version.Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Martin Atayo CEOMPGATECHNOLOGIES CORPP.O.Box 1689Washington DC 20013 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

1 0