lists.icann.org
Sign In Sign Up
Manage this list Sign In Sign Up

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview

Comments-iana-naming-function-contract-amend-10feb21

Download
Threads by month
  • ----- 2026 -----
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2025 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2024 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2023 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2022 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2021 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
comments-iana-naming-function-contract-amend-10feb21@icann.org

  • 3 discussions
Business Constituency (BC) support for proposed amendment to IANA Naming Function Contract
by Steve DelBianco March 23, 2021

March 23, 2021
The ICANN Business Constituency (BC) supports the proposed amendment to the IANA Naming Function Contract<https://pti.icann.org/iana-naming-function-services-service-level-agreements>: Article VII, Section 7.1 (a): This statement, "The relevant policies under which the changes are made shall be noted within each monthly report," be removed from the contract as it is a legacy statement from the NTIA contract that is no longer required. Implementation of this requirement has long been recognized as being operationally impracticable ever since the time of the NTIA contract, and the IFRT is satisfied that its continued inclusion in the contract adds no value to the reports. This comment was approved in accord with our charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice Chair for Policy Coordination ICANN Business Constituency (BC)
1 0
0 0
Ratified: ALAC Statement on IANA Naming Function Review: Recommendation for an IANA Naming Function Contract Amendment
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 22, 2021

March 22, 2021
Dear All, Please find attached the ALAC Statement on IANA Naming Function Review: Recommendation for an IANA Naming Function Contract Amendment<https://community.icann.org/x/hQVtCQ>. ALAC ratification information is included on the cover page. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
1 0
0 0
RySG Comments on the IANA Naming Function Review: Recommendation for an IANA Naming Function Contract Amendment
by Elizabeth Bacon March 22, 2021

March 22, 2021
Hello, On behalf of the gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG), please find attached our comments on the IANA Naming Function Review: Recommendation for an IANA Naming Function Contract Amendment. In the interest of time, we did not conduct a vote on these comments. We did discuss them on our mailing list and during a biweekly conference call, and no member opposed their submission. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Best, Elizabeth Bacon Elizabeth Bacon | RySG Vice Chair, Policy
1 0
0 0

HyperKitty Powered by HyperKitty version 1.3.12.