- Comments-multistakeholder-model-next-steps-04jun20

Comment from JJN Solutions to Enhancing the Multistakeholder Model (Parts 2 and 3)
by Jeff Neuman July 31, 2020

July 31, 2020

Please find attached our comments, which were originally posted at: https://www.jjnsolutions.com/post/enhancing-the-multi-stakeholder-model-wit… (Part 2) and https://www.jjnsolutions.com/post/help-save-the-multi-stakeholder-model-par… (Part 3). Part 1 was the comment already submitted last year during one of the other public comment periods. I have provided PDFs, but it may be more easily viewable through the links. [cid:image001.png@01D66736.45157F60] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com

1 0

RySG Comment on Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s MSM – Next Steps
by Demetriou, Samantha July 31, 2020

July 31, 2020

Hello, On behalf of the gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG), please find attached our comments on the Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps document. In the interest of time, we did not conduct a vote on these comments. We did discuss them on our mailing list and during a biweekly conference call, and no member opposed their submission. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Best, Samantha Demetriou RySG Vice Chair, Policy

1 0

GNSO Council Comment: Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps
by Ariel Liang July 30, 2020

July 30, 2020

On behalf of the GNSO Council, please find attached its input on the Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps. Best Regards, Ariel Ariel Xinyue Liang GNSO Policy Support Specialist Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

1 0

Public comment
by Betty Fausta - IPEOS July 15, 2020

July 15, 2020

* PDP 3.0 (Communauté) =>certains sujets sont très pointus et demande aux nouveaux venus une vraie phase d'observation avant de contribuer. peut on imaginer un schéma de mentoring, des référents prêt à répondre aux non experts afin d'avoir des diversités d'opinions et pas un groupes de retraités ou d'avocats ou de lobbyiste payés et ayant le temps de faire passer leurs idées sous pretexte de multi partiprenante alors que tout le monde c'est que c'est difficile à démonter Programme de bourses (Org) => le programme de bourse ne prend pas assez en compte l'impact du COVID qui permet d'avoir une réserve plus importante pour faciliter l'engagement de certains territoires ou l'engagement de profils moins bien dotés financierement ou ayant des connaissances faibles sur la gourvenance d'interne Améliorer les procédures de consultation publique et autres publications du personnel (Org) =>un grand bravo pour la démarche de communication pour les commentaire publique et surtout la remise de rapport en français ; ---- LE BIKLAB - SOCIAL FABLAB& INTERNET GOVERNANCE ALS EURALO/LACRALO -AT-LARGE STRUCTURE .gp FELLOW ICANN61 - ICANN65 -GNSO IRT EPDP MEMBER CPWG AT LARGE POLICY [ ARIN FELLOW 2019 Mobile : +590 (0) 690 4973 09 (Guadeloupe) [ http://www.lebiklab.com/ | www.lebiklab.com ] | [ mailto:bureau@lebiklab.com | bureau(a)lebiklab.com ]

1 0

Enhancing MSM
by Javier Rua June 15, 2020

June 15, 2020

Hello, and thanks for the chance to comment. In regards topics 5 & 6 (Culture, trust, and silos /Roles and responsibilities) one aspect that seems absent from all discussion is at least having a conversation on professional facilitation in thorny issues. This idea might go a bit against the grain in terms of community self-governance; agree this aspect cannot be underestimated, but the truth is that there are profesional entities out there that are experts in getting diverse and even enemy groups to sit down and negotiate (from peace / reconciliation agreements among guerrillas and states, to more run of the mill, less bellicose disagreements). I’ve seen these entities in action (I remember one called REOS Partners https://reospartners.com/) and I truly believe these professional approaches could help a working group be more purposeful, efficient and effective-Maybe pack months of work into a few days. If this idea is completely out of the ICANN Multistakeholder self-governance comfort zone, perhaps one of these professional organizations could help train ICANN community volunteer/leaders and perhaps also ICANN staff, on these communication and consensus building techniques. ICANN org would get great ‘bang for the buck’ in investments such as these, which would both enhance participation and speed-up processes in WGs & PDPs. Thanks again! Javier Rúa-Jovet ALAC

1 0