- comments-org-renewal-18mar19@icann.org

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by marios basileiou April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I am a domain name registrant. ICANN does not seem to recognize the difference between a legacy extension created with the support of the US government, that predates the existence of ICANN and that has millions of existing users and the brand new extensions that started off with a new set of rules, in particular no price controls, and no existing registrants. They have completely different characteristics, history, and ownership structure. It is not acceptable for ICANN to ignore these differences and to propose that they be treated the same. Removing price caps is not fair to .org domain owners. Many of them have websites that they have used for years. If price caps are removed, the cost to renew their domain names may become too expensive, and they could be forced to give up websites that are important to them. The Uniform Rapid Suspension policy is too new and untested to apply on domain names that may be 20 years old or more. With the URS, the domain names could be taken down in a matter of days with little notice. ICANN should be doing more to protect owners of .org domain names. Why is ICANN trying to remove price protections for .org domain owners, so many of which are non-profits, so that they can be overcharged for their domain names? Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .Org Price Caps
by Taylor Smith April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

Please don't do this! Keep them low as they are. Sincerely, A concerned non-profit member.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Please don’t remove the price caps.
by Cong Liu April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

Dear ICANN, I heard from Quincy Larson, the founder of FreeCodeCamp, he twittered about this issue that the monopoly of domains is hurt their non-profit organization. I feel sorry for that. If there is anything I could do to save their beneifts, I would not hesitate to take action. So I want to tell you their org really changed my life and millions of others’. What they are doing is impressive, let’s help them instead make any negative effect on them. Sincerely, Cong Liu

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Do not remove restriction
by marios basileiou April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I believe you should not remove the restriction because a lot of companies will take advantage of that and is not right Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .ORG Renewal Costs
by Chris eugene April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I read on Twitter that you wanted to remove the cap on .org domain registration thereby allowing the company(ies) that are in charge or control of these domains to charge whatever they like. This is going to be strenuous to the not for profits who legit help people via their sites. Please reconsider this decision mainly because you’re enriching organisations unfairly while marginalising others which may have higher impact.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by Poison Ivy Expert April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I am a .org registrant. Raising prices, removing price caps for .orgs is BAD IDEA, is like a dominos theory. Causing much financial ruin and hardships tor those whom heavily are invested in .org url registrations ICANN staff should not unilaterally impose URS in legacy TLDs when that issue is precisely what is being examined by the volunteer ICANN Working Group who has been mandated to review this issue. ICANN policy making is supposed to be a ‘bottom up, multi-stakeholder model’. I believe that legacy gTLDs are fundamentally different from for-profit new gTLDs. Legacy TLDs are essentially a public trust, unlike new gTLDs which were created, bought and paid for by private interests. Registrants of legacy TLDs are entitled to price stability and predictability, and should not be subject to price increases with no maximums. Unlike new gTLDs, registrants of legacy TLDs registered their names and made their online presence on legacy TLDs on the basis that price caps would continue to exist. Unrestrained price increases on the millions of .org registrants who are not-for-profits or non-profits would be unfair to them. Unchecked price increases have the potential to result in hundreds of millions of dollars being transferred from these organizations to one non-profit, the Internet Society, with .org registrants receiving no benefit in return. ICANN should not allow one non-profit nearly unlimited access to the funds of other non-profits. ICANN appears to be entirely catering to registries by removing price caps. ICANN should stand up for the public interest and registrants! ICANN MUST NOT ALLOW PRICE INCREASE TO OCCUR!!

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by Rokenbokman1 April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I am a domain name registrant. ICANN does not seem to recognize the difference between a legacy extension created with the support of the US government, that predates the existence of ICANN and that has millions of existing users and the brand new extensions that started off with a new set of rules, in particular no price controls, and no existing registrants. They have completely different characteristics, history, and ownership structure. It is not acceptable for ICANN to ignore these differences and to propose that they be treated the same. Removing price caps is not fair to .org domain owners. Many of them have websites that they have used for years. If price caps are removed, the cost to renew their domain names may become too expensive, and they could be forced to give up websites that are important to them. The Uniform Rapid Suspension policy is too new and untested to apply on domain names that may be 20 years old or more. With the URS, the domain names could be taken down in a matter of days with little notice. ICANN should be doing more to protect owners of .org domain names. Why is ICANN trying to remove price protections for .org domain owners, so many of which are non-profits, so that they can be overcharged for their domain names?

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by Hani M. Abdel Aal April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I am a .info registrant (not-for-profit).Removing price caps on .org is a bad idea. Many people and me are using .info for personal professional identification. We are not using for profit. In case, the price is increased, I will not renew and many transfer to another cheaper extensions. I may stop using domain names and rely on facebook and other social media free sub-websites, Hani M. Abdel Aal (+20) 102 75 44001 (Mobile) www.hanitdm.info

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Please don't kill our non-profits
by Ariel Thompson April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

As a volunteer who donates my time as an expert in software development and computer science, I am writing to beg you not to revoke the price cap on .org domains. Our small non-profit cannot afford exorbitant rates and being forced to change domains could dramatically decrease our reach and result in those we help being unable to find and access our resources. Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Ariel Thompson Colorado, USA

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by Graham Cobb April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I am a personal, individual, not-for-profit .org registrant. I use a .org domain as my family email domain. Changing this name would involve my family and friends in a lot of hassle and would significantly disrupt my social network, so I have a strong incentive to keep the name. On the other hand, as an ordinary person I have limited funds to spend on a domain name. I need confidence that the name I use will not increase dramatically in price. .org is the only option that gives me that confidence today. The legacy TLDs, particularly .org, are completely different from the for-profit new TLDs and should be treated differently. These are not commercial assets but form the backbone of the Internet as we know it today. In particular, ICANN has a responsibility to take into account public benefit for ordinary people and not-for-profit organisations to enable their effective use of the Internet. That includes having a naming option with price predictability & stability. ICANN need to make sure the .org contract includes effective protections for ordinary domain registrants, all around the world. Graham Cobb

1 0