- comments-org-renewal-18mar19@icann.org

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Dot org pricing
by Shawn Stevenson April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

Removing caps on dot org domain with have dramatic effects on the majority of the nonprofit organizations which utilize this top level domain name. Please keep the caps that are currently in place. Shawn Stevenson Washington State, USA Sent from my iPhone

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Comment - .org renewal
by Damian Martin April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

Hello, I would like to comment on the .org renewal proposal, in particular section 2.10 regarding pricing cap. Many .org domains are used by non-profit and charitable organisations who will be placed in financial distress if renewal fees rise substantially. Is it possible to keep the cap for registered NFP, charity and maybe open source orgainsations? Kind regards, Damian Martin IS Technical Coordinator [https://mobile.phcs.org.au/clo/Avivo.jpg] D: (08) 9442 7221 T: 1300 428 486 30 Hasler Road Osborne Park WA 6017 avivo.org.au Avivo acknowledges the traditional owners of country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to land and community. We pay our respect to them and their cultures, and to elders past and present.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by Thewsomeguy April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I am a .org registrant. ICANN staff should not unilaterally impose URS in legacy TLDs when that issue is precisely what is being examined by the volunteer ICANN Working Group who has been mandated to review this issue. ICANN policy making is supposed to be a ‘bottom up, multi-stakeholder model’. I believe that legacy gTLDs are fundamentally different from for-profit new gTLDs. Legacy TLDs are essentially a public trust, unlike new gTLDs which were created, bought and paid for by private interests. Registrants of legacy TLDs are entitled to price stability and predictability, and should not be subject to price increases with no maximums. Unlike new gTLDs, registrants of legacy TLDs registered their names and made their online presence on legacy TLDs on the basis that price caps would continue to exist. Unrestrained price increases on the millions of .org registrants who are not-for-profits or non-profits would be unfair to them. Unchecked price increases have the potential to result in hundreds of millions of dollars being transferred from these organizations to one non-profit, the Internet Society, with .org registrants receiving no benefit in return. ICANN should not allow one non-profit nearly unlimited access to the funds of other non-profits. ICANN appears to be entirely catering to registries by removing price caps. ICANN should stand up for the public interest and registrants!

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Legacy TLD
by COMV services April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I am a .org registrant. I believe that legacy gTLDs are fundamentally different from for-profit new gTLDs. Legacy TLDs are essentially a public trust, unlike new gTLDs which were created, bought and paid for by private interests. Registrants of legacy TLDs are entitled to price stability and predictability, and should not be subject to price increases with no maximums. Unlike new gTLDs, registrants of legacy TLDs registered their names and made their online presence on legacy TLDs on the basis that price caps would continue to exist. Unrestrained price increases on the millions of .org registrants who are not-for-profits or non-profits would be unfair to them. Unchecked price increases have the potential to result in hundreds of millions of dollars being transferred from these organizations to one non-profit, the Internet Society, with .org registrants receiving no benefit in return. ICANN should not allow one non-profit nearly unlimited access to the funds of other non-profits. ICANN appears to be entirely catering to registries by removing price caps. ICANN should stand up for the public interest and registrants! WESTON CHILDERS Film Director | Collaborator | Entrepreneur

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] don’t end the cap on .org price
by Jean-Philippe Papillon (personnel) April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

Short version : it’s a shame if ICANN has no experience on public policy to the point of suggesting there can « price competition » on.org domains. Long version: read http://www.circleid.com/posts/20190423_spurious_justifications_for_eliminat… Please, don’t ruin the little bit of credibility of ICANN or there will be governments interventions. Jean-Philippe PAPILLON, depuis son mobile +33 6 07 84 63 87

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] comments-org-renewal
by Michael Sheppard April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

The old .ORG registry agreement with PIR placed a cap of 10% on annual price increases. What is wrong with an annual 10% increase? On what basis does PIR need more? Does ICANN bear no role in consumer protectionism? -- [cid:part1.2AD0F6FF.A6D6AF49@bz.gt.com] This email (and any attachments) is confidential and may also be legally privileged. Anything in this email (and any attachments) which does not relate to official business of The Firm is neither given nor endorsed by The Firm. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and destroy any copies of it (and any attachments).

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by dumitruxi＠gmail.com April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

I am a domain name registrant. ICANN staff should not unilaterally impose URS in legacy TLDs when that issue is precisely what is being examined by the volunteer ICANN Working Group who has been mandated to review this issue. ICANN policy making is supposed to be a ‘bottom up, multi-stakeholder model’. I believe that legacy gTLDs are fundamentally different from for-profit new gTLDs. Legacy TLDs are essentially a public trust, unlike new gTLDs which were created, bought and paid for by private interests. Registrants of legacy TLDs are entitled to price stability and predictability, and should not be subject to price increases with no maximums. Unlike new gTLDs, registrants of legacy TLDs registered their names and made their online presence on legacy TLDs on the basis that price caps would continue to exist. Unrestrained price increases on the millions of .org registrants who are not-for-profits or non-profits would be unfair to them. Unchecked price increases have the potential to result in hundreds of millions of dollars being transferred from these organizations to one non-profit, the Internet Society, with .org registrants receiving no benefit in return. ICANN should not allow one non-profit nearly unlimited access to the funds of other non-profits. ICANN appears to be entirely catering to registries by removing price caps. ICANN should stand up for the public interest and registrants! Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Not in favour of the proposed .org agreement
by SkyTrain for Surrey April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

A lot of the users of .org domains are nonprofits, such as ourselves. A new contract with PIR that removes price caps could impact the bottom line of non-profits like us and others. Sent from Mail for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .org Comment
by Mondomax April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

It's hard enough trying to run a non-profit organization without being attacked by ever increasing prices. I want to state that the regular 10% increases are enough and changing these parameters could take effect on a lot of organizations that already work so hard in these trying times to produce our donations. We are already being bombarded from too many angles and now you want to put the icing on the cake, the last straw that will break the camels back. I vote NO to the increases. Please keep it the way that it is. Thank you! Armando C. mondo334(a)gmail.com http://kidsbibleclubhouse.org

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] please stop doing increase in pricing
by Eugene K April 26, 2019

April 26, 2019

that is nonsense .org is one the expensive domain now!

1 0