- comments-org-renewal-18mar19@icann.org

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] The proposed .org agreement is a low-minded disservice to the business community and
by Kell Marelle April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I am a .org registrant. ICANN does not seem to recognize the difference between a legacy extension created with the support of the US government, that predates the existence of ICANN and that has millions of existing users and the brand new extensions that started off with a new set of rules, in particular no price controls, and no existing registrants. They have completely different characteristics, history, and ownership structure. It is not acceptable for ICANN to ignore these differences and to propose that they be treated the same. Removing price caps is not fair to .org domain owners. Many of them have websites that they have used for years. If price caps are removed, the cost to renew their domain names may become too expensive, and they could be forced to give up websites that are important to them. The Uniform Rapid Suspension policy is too new and untested to apply on domain names that may be 20 years old or more. With the URS, the domain names could be taken down in a matter of days with little notice. ICANN should be doing more to protect owners of .org domain names. Why is ICANN trying to remove price protections for .org domain owners, so many of which are non-profits, so that they can be overcharged for their domain names? Sincerely, Kellan Halleck

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .org Price Caps
by James D. Fowlie April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I am astonished that ICANN, knowing quite well that the purpose of the .org domain would encompass many types of organizations, including non-profits, would consider removing the price caps on .org domain names. Many organizations have built up equity in their .org domain, and now could be exposed to pricing pressures, especially when less sophisticated users find themselves seemingly locked in to a particular registrar. While registrar transfers are certainly doable, they are not easy -- nor should they be. But they should not have to find that they have to keep rushing around to the cheapest registrar in order to keep things affordable. There are plenty of domains that are available without price caps. Please don't make management more difficult for organizations that need whatever help they can get. Thanks, --James Fowlie

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Do not adjust the .org costs
by Joshua Awesome - Kindly Thrive Business Support April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

.orgs are often non-profits. I help hundreds of non-profits and I really do not want to see a substantial increase in costs to these wonderful organizations. Thank you! -- Sincerely, Joshua Awesome - Creator @ *Kindly Thrive <https://kindlythrive.com/> & Loving Cooperative <http://lovingcoop.com/> * IT/Marketing/Web/Business/Creative Support for Kind Organizations Cell 509.280.3362 *INVeg | Spokane VegFest | Jane Unchained News | Meals 4 The Planet The Gentle Chef | VegFest LA | Woman's Club Spokane | Miyoko's Kitchen Raw Herbalist | Julie & Kittee | Eric & Peety | River's Wish Animal Sanctuary and more. * /We are Creating a More Loving and Compassionate Planet Together./ <https://kindlythrive.com/>

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Comment on .org renewel
by Adam Bowers April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I am very concerned with the proposed change to remove price caps on .org domains. As someone who currently has a few of these and leads a non-profit organization, I am very disappointed that this would even be considered. Low costs are part of what keeps the internet a place of freedom. Allowing resellers to charge much higher prices will destroy the free and open internet as we know it and possibly cause many of our non-profits to have to change their names and domain names just because of unreasonable costs. - Adam Bowers

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Keep domains cheap
by Troy Curfman April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Why charge more and take advantage?

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Feedback on the .org agreement
by Alastair McDermott April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I am a .org registrant. Legacy gTLDs are fundamentally different from for-profit new gTLDs and should be treated that way. Legacy TLDs are what the internet was built on. They are essentially a public trust. They are very different than new gTLDs which were created, bought and paid for by private parties. Registrants of these legacy extensions should be entitled to price predictability & stability. Advancements in technology should be driving the cost of operating a registry down, yet prices keep going up? Removing price caps is unfair to the millions of domain registrants. They will have no price protections. Every registrant will be at the complete mercy and whims of the registry. This could result in a transfer of funds from millions of non-profits to one non-profit, with no benefits to the domain registrants. ICANN is supposed to represent a "bottom up, consensus-driven multistakeholder model". ICANN should not unilaterally impose URS in legacy TLDs when that issue is precisely what is being examined by the volunteer ICANN Working Group who has been mandated to review this issue. ICANN should be looking out for the .org registrants, in particular the non-profits. There is no "public benefit" justification to these changes. It is just a handout to business at the expense of registrants’ rights and protections. Where are the protections for the millions of domain registrants that this could effect in a negative way? These changes would give way too much power to the registry. This is not acceptable for a "public benefit" organization that exists to represent many stakeholders. Regards, Alastair.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Comment on .org registry price cap
by Alana Nelson April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I am writing to express my strong objection to the removal of the price cap on .org domain fees. I know that ICANN has had an advisory committee reviewing the plan and that they have expressed very strong concerns about it as well. The fact that ICANN is ignoring the advisory committee's concerns, as well as disregarding significant consumer protection issues with the plan is not only concerning but also alarming given your role. I urge you to take into consideration the concerns and objections of the advisory committee and others and keep a price cap in place to protect consumers from potentially extreme rate hikes now or in the future. Best regards, Alana Nelson Fire Mountain Solar LLC Phone: 360-422-5610 Fax: 360-539-0045 www.firemountainsolar.com Authorized Dealer for Blue Ion 2.0, the safest lithium energy storage solution on the planet!<https://www.firemountainsolar.com/news/now-offering-blue-ion-2-0-lithium-en…> Want to learn more about supporting Solar Legislation in Washington State? Add your name here to Keep WA Solar Strong<http://solarstrongwa.org>. [https://imgssl.constantcontact.com/letters/images/1101093164665/jmml_opgr1_…]<http://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1114250523675&id=preview> [like-us-on-facebook-button] <http://www.facebook.com/firemountainsolar> [254FB6A6] <https://www.instagram.com/firemountainsolar/> This message may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or information herein. If you have received this message by error, please advise the sender immediately and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Opposed to the new .org agreement
by League of Women Voters Tulsa April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Dear ICANN, ICANN staff should not unilaterally impose URS in legacy TLDs when that issue is precisely what is being examined by the volunteer ICANN Working Group who has been mandated to review this issue. ICANN policy making is supposed to be a 'bottom up, multi-stakeholder model'. I believe that legacy gTLDs are fundamentally different from for-profit new gTLDs. Legacy TLDs are essentially a public trust, unlike new gTLDs which were created, bought and paid for by private interests. Registrants of legacy TLDs are entitled to price stability and predictability, and should not be subject to price increases with no maximums. Unlike new gTLDs, registrants of legacy TLDs registered their names and made their online presence on legacy TLDs on the basis that price caps would continue to exist. Unrestrained price increases on the millions of .org registrants who are not-for-profits or non-profits would be unfair to them. Unchecked price increases have the potential to result in hundreds of millions of dollars being transferred from these organizations to one non-profit, the Internet Society, with .org registrants receiving no benefit in return. ICANN should not allow one non-profit nearly unlimited access to the funds of other non-profits. ICANN appears to be entirely catering to registries by removing price caps. ICANN should stand up for the public interest and registrants! Sincerely Shailaja Marion Administrative Director League of Women Voters of Metro Tulsa (918) 747-7933 1910 S. Lewis Avenue Tulsa, OK 74104 lwvtulsa.org<http://lwvtulsa.org/> [fb]<https://www.facebook.com/pages/League-of-Women-Voters-of-Tulsa/128983408782…>[twirr]<https://twitter.com/lwvtulsa>

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .org renewal
by Ryan Gardner April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

We support many non-profit organizations who use .org domain names and they are increasingly constrained by budgets set a year or two in advance where every dollar is managed. Allowing unlimited .org price increases hurts the organizations that do the most good in the US. Please, be smart about this and keep the limits in place so that a few large companies aren’t lining their pockets with money that could be spent elsewhere to make meaningful impacts in our communities. - Ryan Gardner Visual People Design https://www.visualpeople.com

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Non-approval of the removal of the price caps in the proposed .org Renewal agreement
by Jaco Redelinghuys CA(SA) April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Dear ICANN I, as part of the general public are very troubled by the what appears to be ICANN Staff's complete disregard for registrants and the public interest when it comes to the removal of all price caps in the Proposed .org Renewal Agreement. Most non-profit organisations use .org domains and taking off the price cap will negatively affect these vulnerable institutions, of which I am working for one in South Africa. I therefore submit my non-approval of the removal of the price caps in the proposed .org Renewal agreement. When price caps are released, greed will eventually follow, and that will lead to many non-profits that are price sensitive to lose their domains. This is bad for the world, and bad for non-profit organisation or public benefit organisation beneficiaries. The few individuals who are behind this, will obviously reap the gain of this crime against humanity. My service provider informed me of the price shocks that would follow. So please do not remove the price caps. Please take my vote into consideration. Jaco Redelinghuys South Africa

1 0