I don't think it makes sense for ICANN to remove the price-caps on registration of .org domains. The registry-service-providers are contractors operating the .org registry at the hire of ICANN (and for the public good). It does not make sense to allow the contractor to set any price they want. The operation of the .org domain is significantly different in nature to an entity which requests, markets, and operates a new gTLD. It does not make sense to treat the operator of the .org domain "equitably" with operators of a gTLD, as the operator of a gTLD is not being given the gift of a top-level-domain with large cultural, social, and economic value.

The operator of the .org domain operates a monopoly with a large amount of value, and ICANN should continue to intervene in the pricing of the monopoly good to arrive at an economically fair outcome.

It does not make sense to treat the service-provider of the .org domain the same as the operators of gTLDs as the operator of a gTLD has invented, marketing, and branded the gTLD. The .org domain is a fixture of the public internet, not something that requires actual investment or marketing on the part of the service-provider.

I am against this proposed change in the service agreement:

Thanks,
Antoine