I am a .org registrant (not-for-profit). With the proposed policy changes for .org domains, ICANN is failing to recognize the difference between a legacy extension created with the support of the US government---which predates the existence of ICANN and that has millions of existing users---and brand-new extensions that started off with a new set of rules, no price controls, and no existing registrants. Legacy TLDs have completely different characteristics, history, and ownership structure. It is not acceptable for ICANN to ignore these differences and to propose that they be treated the same. Removing price caps is not fair to .org domain owners. Many of them have websites that they have used for years. If price caps are removed, the cost to renew their domain names may become too expensive, and they could be forced to give up websites that are important to them. This would likely have the effect of destroying important parts of the World Wide Web's history. What would happen, for example, if archive.org were priced out of their domain? This would be an unequivocal disaster, the responsibility for which would fall squarely on ICANN. The Uniform Rapid Suspension policy is too new and untested to apply on domain names that may be 20 years old or more. With the URS, the domain names could be taken down in a matter of days with little notice. ICANN should be doing more to protect owners of .org domain names. Why is ICANN trying to remove price protections for .org domain owners---many of which are non- or not-for-profits? Please do not break the .org registry. This would be a huge, unrecoverable mistake. Best regards, -=rsw