On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 at 18:36, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:

On 13 September 2017 at 01:17, Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org> wrote:

...

Thank you for the suggestion, Bernhard. We'll take it into consider if the document is revived, as you said.

-- Francisco

On 9/12/17, 2:00 AM, "Bernhard Reutner-Fischer" <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:

...

The "RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars" version 1.0 Document erroneously talks about "publicIDs" (as opposed to "publicIds" specified in RFC 7483). Please fix if the operational profile ever gets revived. In general the profile could need a touch-up, IMHO.

Further notes i took.

1.4.10. An RDAP response MUST contain a remarks member with a description containing the string "This response conforms to the RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars version 1.0".

Since remarks are only allowed in objects classes and /help is not an object this requirement should mention "object response" somewhere as otherwise it would be in violation with the RFC.

1.5.20. A domain name RDAP response MUST contain a remarks member with a title "Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form", a description containing the string "URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf" and a links member with the https://www.icann.org/wicf URL.

Drop the "www." part of the URL to be consistent with 1.5.18 (the "https://icann.org/epp" URL)

The proposed rdap-profile-31aug18 still uses the superlong wicf URL. Please double check the 31aug18 profile against my comments above. thanks,