- comments-pti-iana-fy20-28sep18@icann.org

[Comments-pti-iana-fy20-28sep18] NCSG comment
by Rafik Dammak Nov. 13, 2018

Nov. 13, 2018

Hi, Please find attached NCSG comment. Best Regards. Rafik

1 0

[Comments-pti-iana-fy20-28sep18] Draft IANA/PTI FY20 Budget
by Berry Cobb Nov. 12, 2018

Nov. 12, 2018

Dear Xavier, On behalf of the GNSO Council, please find attached comments regarding the draft FY20 IANA/PTI budget as constructed by the SCBO and accepted by the GNSO Council without objection. Thank you. B Berry Cobb GNSO Policy Consultant @berrycobb

1 0

[Comments-pti-iana-fy20-28sep18] RrSG response to the Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets
by Zoe Bonython Nov. 12, 2018

Nov. 12, 2018

Hello, On behalf of the Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG), I’d like to submit the attached response to the Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets. Kind regards, Zoe Bonython RrSG Secretariat

1 0

[Comments-pti-iana-fy20-28sep18] RySG Comment on Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets
by Demetriou, Samantha Nov. 12, 2018

Nov. 12, 2018

On behalf of the gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG), please find attached our comments on the Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets. In the interest of time, we did not conduct a vote on these comments. We did discuss them on our mailing list and during a biweekly conference call, and no member opposed their submission. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Best, Samantha Demetriou RySG Vice Chair, Policy

1 0

[Comments-pti-iana-fy20-28sep18] Pending Ratification: Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets
by ICANN At-Large Staff Nov. 12, 2018

Nov. 12, 2018

Dear All, Please find attached the ALAC statement on the Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace%3A+Dra…>. Please note on 09 November 2018, the ALAC Chair requested an extension to submit the ALAC statement to public comment due to the involvement of key contributors of the ALAC who were engaged at the IGF 2018 (email attached). In the interest of time, the ALAC Chair requested that the statement be transmitted to the ICANN public comment process with a note that the statement is pending ALAC ratification and a more substantive statement will be submitted after the due date. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

[Comments-pti-iana-fy20-28sep18] Business Constituency Comment on draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets
by Steve DelBianco Nov. 10, 2018

Nov. 10, 2018

Below and attached is the comment of ICANN’s Business Constituency (BC), regarding draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets PTI: The BC notes responsive improvement in the FY20 PTI Operating Plan and Budget proposal based on past comments. However, on page 7 there is a 0.1% reduction in FY20 Budget compared to that of FY19 when the subject values (Total Cash Expenses) are each USD$10m, which is confusing. Similar situation is noted on the computations. We request that figures be computed to 2 decimal positions instead of one so that the equivalent percentage difference can be apparent. Also, since ICANN is producing long term budget scenarios, BC recommends that PTI does the same. The BC endorses this draft PTI budget if noted computational errors are corrected. IANA: The BC notes responsive improvement in the FY20 IANA Operating Plan and Budget proposal based on past comments. However, on page 5 there is a 0.1% reduction in FY20 Budget compared to that of FY19 when the subject values (Total Cash Expenses) are each USD$10m, which is confusing. We request that figures be computed to 2 decimal positions instead of one so that the equivalent percentage difference can be apparent. We note an error in the computation of percentage increase of IANA budget handled by ICANN, which is 1.9% instead of 2.2% as indicated. Also, since ICANN is producing long term budget scenarios, BC recommends that IANA does the same. The BC endorses this draft IANA budget if noted computational errors are corrected. -- This comment was drafted by Jimson Olufuye, and was approved in accord with our charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice Chair for Policy Coordination ICANN Business Constituency

1 0