September 2015 - council - lists.icann.org

Re: [council] RE: Preparation for discussion on Item 5 Letter from ICANN Board Chair on Exclusive Registry Access for gTLD Terms representing Generic Strings
by Mary Wong Sept. 2, 2015

Sept. 2, 2015

Hello Donna and everyone, While staff can¹t answer the specific questions you ask below, perhaps the text of the NGPC resolution on the closed generics issue, as well as the rationale provided alongside, can be helpful as some background and context as the Council continues to deliberate this topic: https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2015-06- 21-en#2.a Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org From: <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin(a)neustar.biz> Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 02:47 To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org>, "GNSO Council List (council(a)gnso.icann.org)" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] RE: Preparation for discussion on Item 5 Letter from ICANN Board Chair on Exclusive Registry Access for gTLD Terms representing Generic Strings > Thanks for the prompt Glen. > > I have a question for those on the Council who are much more familiar with the > New gTLD PDP. Is the GAC advice that the NGPC adopted inconsistent with the > original policy? And if it is, should the NGPC be informed accordingly. > > If I understand the issue correctively, there were a number of applicants who > sought to operate closed generic TLDs (or exclusive registry access); however, > as a result of the NGPC¹s acceptance of GAC advice the applicant had to change > their application to reflect an open registry or accept that it will not > possible to operate a closed generic in the current round. The NGPC is not > rejecting the remaining handful of closed generic applications, but have > chosen to defer them to a subsequent round and I think this is why the Council > has received the letter from Dr Crocker. It will be necessary to have address > this as a policy issue in the context of the subsequent round PDP. > > Perhaps we need a bit more of the backstory on this one. > > Thanks > > Donna > > Donna Austin:Neustar, Inc. > Policy and Industry Affairs Manager > Cell:+1.310.890.9655 Email: donna.austin(a)neustar.biz > <mailto:donna.austin@neustar.biz> > > > > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use > of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this > e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or > copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original > message. > Follow Neustar: Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc> LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349> Twitter > <http://www.twitter.com/neustar> > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > > > > > > From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On > Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry > Sent: Tuesday, 1 September 2015 10:52 AM > To: GNSO Council List (council(a)gnso.icann.org) <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > Subject: [council] Preparation for discussion on Item 5 Letter from ICANN > Board Chair on Exclusive Registry Access for gTLD Terms representing Generic > Strings > > Dear Councillors, > > We would like to remind you of the letter > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_syste… > files_correspondence_crocker-2Dto-2Drobinson-2D27jul15-2Den.pdf&d=AwMFAw&c=MOp > tNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=JO049AZgl1 > OxfYX9i-iLb48As9xDCyWzTZu9sDnd-bo&s=RnnanKBb6k_KqZolyri7qfigycXh7h5X5yqZVMHDCX > Q&e=> from Steve Crocker to Jonathan Robinson re: ICANN Board New gTLD > Program Committee Resolution Concerning Exclusive Registry Access for > gTLD Strings Representing Generic Terms which is the subject for > discussion in Item 5 on the GNSO Council agenda and noted below. There was one > comment > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_mailing-… > lists_archives_council_msg17369.html&d=AwMFAw&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3Lw > UUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=JO049AZgl1OxfYX9i-iLb48As9xDCyWzTZu9s > Dnd-bo&s=-UE_w4mKvG9x1Idq0Yw7XQYJNwgrWPWd9NCTvzJ3S0A&e=> on the Council list > from James Bladel and we encourage you to prepare for this discussion at the > Council meeting on Thursday and perhaps also provide comments on the Council > list in preparation. > > Item 5: COUNCIL DISCUSSION Letter from ICANN Board Chair on Exclusive > Registry Access for gTLD Terms representing Generic Strings (10 minutes) > On 27 July 2015 the ICANN Board Chair sent a letter to the GNSO Chair > requesting that the GNSO specifically include the issue of exclusive registry > access for generic strings serving a public interest goal as part of the > policy work it is planning to initiate on subsequent rounds of the New gTLD > Program. The GNSO was also asked to inform the Board on a regular basis with > regards to progress on the issue. Here the Council will discuss the letter and > decide on its response. > on the GNSO Council agenda, refers to the letter from Steve Crocker to > Jonathan Robinson > > Thank you very much. > Kind regards, > Glen > > Glen de Saint Géry > GNSO Secretariat > gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org > http://gnso.icann.org >

1 0

ccNSO and GNSO letter to GAC on Potential Overlap Work CCWG-UCTN and GAC WG on Protection Geographic Names
by Lars Hoffmann Sept. 1, 2015

Sept. 1, 2015

Dear Councillors, Please find attached a copy of the letter sent to the GAC on behalf of the GNSO and ccNSO Councils. The letter will also be uploaded to the GSNO correspondence page later today: http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/correspondence Best regards, Lars

1 0

Preparation for discussion on Item 5 Letter from ICANN Board Chair on Exclusive Registry Access for gTLD Terms representing Generic Strings
by Glen de Saint Géry Sept. 1, 2015

Sept. 1, 2015

Dear Councillors, We would like to remind you of the letter<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/crocker-to-robinson-27…> from Steve Crocker to Jonathan Robinson re: ICANN Board New gTLD Program Committee Resolution Concerning Exclusive Registry Access for gTLD Strings Representing Generic Terms which is the subject for discussion in Item 5 on the GNSO Council agenda and noted below. There was one comment<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg17369.html> on the Council list from James Bladel and we encourage you to prepare for this discussion at the Council meeting on Thursday and perhaps also provide comments on the Council list in preparation. Item 5: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Letter from ICANN Board Chair on Exclusive Registry Access for gTLD Terms representing Generic Strings (10 minutes) On 27 July 2015 the ICANN Board Chair sent a letter to the GNSO Chair requesting that the GNSO specifically include the issue of exclusive registry access for generic strings serving a public interest goal as part of the policy work it is planning to initiate on subsequent rounds of the New gTLD Program. The GNSO was also asked to inform the Board on a regular basis with regards to progress on the issue. Here the Council will discuss the letter and decide on its response. on the GNSO Council agenda, refers to the letter from Steve Crocker to Jonathan Robinson Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

2 1

FW: ICANN News Alert -- Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
by Steve Chan Aug. 31, 2015

Aug. 31, 2015

Dear Councilors, This message is to inform you that the Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures has been published for public comment. The current close date is 10 October 2015, although the length of the public comment period will be a topic for discussion during the upcoming GNSO Council meeting. Best, Steve Steven Chan Sr. Policy Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan(a)icann.org <mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> direct: +1.310.301.3886 mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 From: ICANN News Alert <communications(a)icann.org> Reply-To: ICANN News Alert <communications(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, August 31, 2015 at 5:51 PM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org> Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures ICANN News Alert <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-08-31-en Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures 31 August 2015 Forum Announcement:Public Comment Period opens onDate:31 August 2015 Categories/Tags:Policy Processes Purpose (Brief):This public comment proceeding is being opened to obtain community input on the Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures. Public Comment Box Link:https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-2015-0 8-31-en This message was sent to steve.chan(a)icann.org from: ICANN News Alert | communications(a)icann.org | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=13773709&l=6333&s=6C1A&m=97 2149&c=165637>

1 0