Subject: Re: [council] Voting Statements
To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, Marika Konings
	<marika.konings@icann.org>, Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com>, "GNSO
 Council List (council@gnso.icann.org)" <council@gnso.icann.org>
References: <89A78B49-85D7-4092-8D1B-A45E49C22A2A@paulmcgrady.com>
 <D30C397F.65DD6%marika.konings@icann.org>
 <D30C8150.B37C7%jbladel@godaddy.com>
From: Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net>
Message-ID: <56E83D83.9040701@rickert.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:51:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
In-Reply-To: <D30C8150.B37C7%jbladel@godaddy.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="o0rOQ7OxEDAOcDbo7eGukwl2D9aiOtgM0"
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: 
 4466fe5b-4057-41ab-29c9-08d34cf21859
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Enterprise: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: PFE112-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
MIME-Version: 1.0

--o0rOQ7OxEDAOcDbo7eGukwl2D9aiOtgM0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="9f6n0hrUSfDhF3Vf8K0liVEFwisKECde5"
From: Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net>
To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>,
 Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>,
 Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com>,
 "GNSO Council List (council@gnso.icann.org)" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Message-ID: <56E83D83.9040701@rickert.net>
Subject: Re: [council] Voting Statements
References: <89A78B49-85D7-4092-8D1B-A45E49C22A2A@paulmcgrady.com>
 <D30C397F.65DD6%marika.konings@icann.org>
 <D30C8150.B37C7%jbladel@godaddy.com>
In-Reply-To: <D30C8150.B37C7%jbladel@godaddy.com>

--9f6n0hrUSfDhF3Vf8K0liVEFwisKECde5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi James,
I can confirm that we have referenced to all papers form the Chartering
Organizations and the GNSO repsonse includes the IPC statement, amongst
others.

While I have not seen (but it may just be me) reference to the
Chartering Organizations' letters in the Board submission to NTIA, I
should mention that NTIA representatives are on the CCWG list and have
therefore taken note of the Chartering Orgs statements.

I hope this helps.

Thomas

Am 14.03.2016 um 20:57 schrieb James M. Bladel:
> Thanks, Marika. =20
>
> If I=B9m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT=
, and
> these were references in their submission to the Board...but we have no=

> confirmation that the Board included these materials in their submissio=
n
> to NTIA.  Is this correct?
>
> If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas.  And I
> presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly t=
o
> the folks at NTIA.
>
> Thank you,
>
> J.
>
>
> On 3/14/16, 11:00 , "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Marika
> Konings" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of
> marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
>
>> Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal messa=
ge
> >from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link=
 to
>> the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and
>> attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal
>> message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here
>> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-Marc=
h/01
>> 1
>> 720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not s=
eem
>> to include the details of the consideration by the different charterin=
g
>> organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of
>> attachments that have been provided.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Marika =20
>>
>> On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Paul
>> McGrady" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of
>> policy@paulmcgrady.com> wrote:
>>
>>> James,
>>>
>>> Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the var=
ious
>>> voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed the=
m
>>> along to the NTIA?  These are an important part of the record and we =
were
>>> assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that
>>> happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the L=
ist
>>> with news.=20
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>

--=20


--9f6n0hrUSfDhF3Vf8K0liVEFwisKECde5--

--o0rOQ7OxEDAOcDbo7eGukwl2D9aiOtgM0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW6D2DAAoJECGcZEVUvnjetAUH/26bjGV4LYwbMFIXPmeJ/D+M
WvXurOtS7u3sNbsTr3xa3i73m9DsHQl3QkkITFETOMOdAZ8Eqhpx3EGWqLMhihN/
yOWrWbRdCrDxw09unNDi1pHjYsWcCzZyoxcqHeAIqaBg88JjyXq5qDiqGkQdVLcQ
s6P2a38u0uPzBypk+9Iqvu8A5Ri13Dajn0SsEkprIrFG5lokoEUy+I/Z8Yh0DucE
ItVtM69L+6Q36c1lW4RkXeip1fir1gX/AOCmOujjBzuHIVa/bHynL5K14cvuoAGW
EXMxeJoVpH81ePfmweTRQXXmxNa7v+iGJD1nFYlJVgCEALTHbXVGzn+mXZnB7a0=
=g9Gb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--o0rOQ7OxEDAOcDbo7eGukwl2D9aiOtgM0--