Regarding Paragraph 21, I think it's  a good summary as to procedure but I think it needs to be much more specific as to a requirement in future WG Charters in relation to the following sentence.
 

The GNSO Council confirms and commits that, going forward, it will be specified in Working Group Charters that  if Working Groups intend to modify a requirement within the Registry Agreement, Registrar Accreditation Agreement, or Consensus Policy via Consensus Policy recommendations, the policy recommendations must explicitly and specifically identify which requirements are intended to be modified and how such requirements are recommended to be modified per their Consensus Policy recommendations.

Thank you,

Anne


Anne Aikman-Scalese
GNSO Councilor
NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026
anneicanngnso@gmail.com


On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 8:42 AM Paul McGrady via council <council@icann.org> wrote:

+1

 

The last sentence of paragraph 21 addresses concerns going forward. Thank you leadership!  Much appreciated.

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

From: farzaneh badii via council <council@icann.org>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2025 10:35 AM
To: DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com>
Cc: Council@icann.org
Subject: [council] Re: Motion re: Billing Contact

 

Thank you Greg and the leadership team. I second the motion. 




Farzaneh 

 

 

On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 11:24 AM DiBiase, Gregory via council <council@icann.org> wrote:

Amazon has replaced the attachment in this email with a download link. Downloads will be available until April 27, 2025, 15:24 (UTC+00:00). Tell us what you think

For more information click here

Hello All,

Please see the attached motion in which the GNSO Council would confirm to ICANN that the EPDP Team did intend to modify the current Registrar Accreditation Agreement requirements related to billing contact, and that the current RAA requirements for the collection, retention, and escrow of billing contact have been eliminated by the Registration Data Policy.

We have added language noting the exceptional circumstances surrounding this issue. We are also cognizant that several Councilors preferred a different approach to resolving this issue. We appreciate this perspective, however, given the amount of discussion to date, Leadership believes a putting this matter to vote is the appropriate next step. We appreciate everyone’s thoughtful comments on this matter and hope we can resolve at April’s meeting.

Thanks,

Greg

 

_______________________________________________
council mailing list -- council@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

This email originated from outside the firm. Please use caution.

_______________________________________________
council mailing list -- council@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.