Thanks Marika. I think we have to go more granular than just the C’, SG’s etc. For example, INTA put in public comments. They are a member of the IPC and a therefore a member of the GNSO community.
Best,
Paul
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 7:59 AM
To: James M. Bladel; Paul McGrady; council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed letter to the Drafting Team
I believe Bruce just answered question #1. With regards to bullet 3:
Best regards,
Marika
Marika Konings
Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings@icann.org
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>
Date: Sunday 22 May 2016 at 13:35
To: Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed letter to the Drafting Team
Hi Paul -
Thanks for kicking this off. Generally, I’m good with this letter. A few questions/comments:
Thanks again—
J.
From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com>
Date: Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:01
To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] Proposed letter to the Drafting Team
Hi all,
On our last call, I volunteered t draft a short letter from James to the Bylaws Drafting Team. Here is the proposed body of that letter to be kicked around the Council list:
________
Dear Bylaws Drafting Team:
The GNSO Council thanks you for your efforts in attempting to distill the instructions found in the CCWG-Accountability Report into a revised version of ICANN’s Bylaws. We note that the draft Bylaws have generated significant public comment from members of the GNSO community. These include:
[Paul McGrady to pull these links out of the public comment after it closes]
We ask you to carefully review each of these comments and give them serious consideration. It is important that the revised Bylaws remain faithful to the CCWG-Accountability Report on which we, as a Council, were called upon to vote in Marrakech. We are fully at your disposal should you wish to consult us on any issue raised in the comments generated by the GNSO community.
Kind regards,
James Bladel
Best,
Paul