| From: |
"Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com> |
| To: |
"Mary Wong" <MWong@piercelaw.edu> |
| CC: |
"GNSO Council" <council@gnso.icann.org> |
| Date: |
3/10/2010 5:49 AM |
| Subject: |
RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and
Motion |
The Reston team - Chuck Gomes, Kristina
Rosette, Jeff Neuman, Caroline
Greer, and myself. Otherwise known as
the Fab Five ;)
Tim
-------- Original Message
--------
Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and
Motion
From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@piercelaw.edu>
Date: Wed,
March 10, 2010 3:13 am
To: "GNSO Council"
<council@gnso.icann.org>
My thanks to Tim and everyone who
worked on this motion - I'm glad we
got to a final
resolution!
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of
Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law
Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email:
mwong@piercelaw.edu
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage:
http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected
writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>>
From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>To:"GNSO Council
"
<council@gnso.icann.org>Date: 3/10/2010 3:29 AMSubject:
[council]
Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion
Two
friendly amendments that I believe most agree resolves the
remaining
issues:
Friendly amendment to the
charter:
Strike the definition for "Relationship between VI and
CO."
Friendly amendment to the motion to add the following
resolve:
Resolved further, that the WG is directed to
develop a version of
objective 5 and to recommend it to the Council
within three weeks for
either (a) Council approval of the
WG-recommended Objective 5 or (b)
Council vote on which version
of Objective 5 (as reflected in the draft
Charter of March 10, 2010)
should
apply.
Tim