Wolf-Ulrich
Wolf-Ulrich, please find
revised version attached incorporating your suggestions. Can you confirm that
this is what you had in mind?
Following that, Darcy, could
you confirm whether you consider these amendments
friendly?
Best
regards,
Marika
From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of WUKnoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>
Reply-To: WUKnoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>
Date: Wednesday, November 2,
2016 at 3:02 AM
To: Darcy Southwell
<darcy.southwell@endurance.com>, "council@gnso.icann.org"
<council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion
– Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community
Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
Thanks
Darcy,
as the GNSO (not the GNSO council)
is one of the chartering organizations I’d like to ask staff to make the motion
consistent with this fact, in particular the Wheras e. to g. and Res.
a.
This would imply that the
potential withdrawal was appropriately discussed within the
community.
I suppose this being friendly
amendments.
As I understand the motion the
approval would mean that
- GNSO members could continue on
their own to participate in the CWG-IG
- there would be no longer a
co-chair from the GNSO
Best
regards
Wolf-Ulrich
From: Darcy Southwell
Sent: Thursday, October
27, 2016 5:26 AM
To:
council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] Motion –
Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community
Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
Dear
Councilors,
Attached is a motion
for the GNSO to withdraw as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community
Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN for
our November 7 Council meeting.
Best,
Darcy
__________
Darcy Southwell
|
Compliance Officer
M: +1 503-453-7305 │
Skype: darcy.enyeart
