Kristina,
 
Thanks for the questions.  Please see below.
 
Chuck

From: Rosette, Kristina [mailto:krosette@cov.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 9:17 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] Alternate Fast Flux Motion

Chuck,
 
Some questions about your motion:
 
(Resolution para. 1)  Who do you anticipate will decide whether the individuals are qualified and what test will be applied in making that determination? 
 
CG: I am not the best person to say but I believe we as the Council should determine who those people are with whatever advice we can get from others.  There are people who understand the issue quite well. 
 
(Resolution para. 2)  Is "that have expertise related to the use of fast flux" intended to modify "groups" or "constituencies"?   Also, one reading of this paragraph is that otherwise qualified individuals who are not affiliated with groups widely recognized as having expertise related to fast flux would be excluded from participating on the expert panel.  Is that the intention?  If so, a brief explanation for that exclusion would be helpful to me.  On the other hand, "related to the use of fast flux" could be very broad.  Is that the intention?  Again, a brief explanation would be helpful. 
 
CG: There was no intention to exclude anyone; my intent was to make sure we have very knowledgeable people who can help us understand the issues as well as possible. 
 
Many thanks.
 
K 
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:57 AM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] Alternate Fast Flux Motion

Here is an alternate motion for consideration by the Council regarding the fast flux issue.  Comments, questions and suggested amendments are welcome.
 
Chuck