Thanks Kurt, I agree it seems likely to be helpful to have a Board Liaison to the Closed Generics group to help ensure greater visibility
to the Board of the discussions which take place.
In reaction to your suggestion Anne, whilst there are obvious benefits, in terms of knowing the background, to appointing a previous Board
Liaison to SubPro, I think there could also be benefits to having a Board Liaison come to the Closed Generic discussion afresh. Regardless, I don’t think that it is really our place to be suggesting who might be appointed as the Board Liaison, I think that
needs to be a matter for the Board itself.
From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>
On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne via council
Sent: 10 November 2022 00:32
To: kurt kjpritz.com <kurt@kjpritz.com>; GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] AOB - Board Liaison to Closed Generic discussion
Kurt,
This certainly seems like a good idea. I would suggest that the Board might want to appoint the liaison from Sub Pro. (Was that Avri?) The topic was covered so extensively in Sub Pro deliberations and the background
on those discussions would be helpful.
Anne
|
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese |
|
Of Counsel |
|
|
|
D. 520.629.4428 |
|
|
From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>
On Behalf Of kurt kjpritz.com via council
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 2:58 PM
To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] AOB - Board Liaison to Closed Generic discussion
[EXTERNAL]
Hi Councillors:
I have been asked to nominate a brief discussion topic for AOB: the provision of a Board Liaison to the GAC-Council Closed Generics Team.
This issue was discussed during a recent RySG meeting with the idea that a Board liaison would be beneficial. Some in that meeting thought that there was an existing provision for a Board liaison. In any case, there have
have been no Board member attendance at the Closed Generics' meetings.
For our Council discussion, I would like to get an understanding as to:
If this can be simply settled or answered via an email discussion, that would be fine also.
Thanks everyone and best regards,
Kurt
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.