Thanks for the work Tatiana, very much appreciated along with the input and understanding from all quarters. I am comfortable with the response. I have made a few formatting changes and lost the first few pages. A redline version is attached, along with a clean PDF that can be transmitted to Patrick and Carlos by staff if folks agree. Donna From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tatiana Tropina Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 1:46 PM To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>; gnso-secs@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [council] Community travel support consultation Dear all, Thanks to everyone who commented on the draft of the proposed response to the Community Travel Support Consultation Questionnaire. I hope there are no other concerns or objections as we have to submit the response soon. Please find attached the revised document. Donna, I accepted all your corrections and, as we discussed, removed the paragraph concerning the fellowship, leaving only the last couple of sentences about KPI and ROI in general without referring to any specific programs or funding. And a note to one more point of concern - the one discussed by Ayden and Donna in the email exchange (expectations of ongoing funding). I deleted the sentence in question because now it doesn't fit the flow of the text and adds nothing to it. In the drafting process, it was a part of the bigger paragraph on the travel flexibility and some other expectations, -- and now this all is either edited or addressed in the answers to other questions. So the "old" sentence looked a bit misplaced. I think this solves all the concerns - also because we do make general statements about supporting community travel in the intro. Ayden, please let me (us) know if you object strongly - I hope not. Warm regards, Tanya