Yes, and the 'summit' naming has generated some heat on some other fora, so it isn't a matter of naming only - summit implies a high level intergovernmental event to some. 

Regards

David

On 16 Nov 2013, at 6:01 pm, Magaly Pazello <magaly.pazello@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi John!
Brazilian gov is not calling "summit" the meeting next year the oficial name is Multstakholder Conference on the Future of Internet Governance.
Magaly

On Saturday, November 16, 2013, John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com> wrote:
>
> What do governments and I-stars mean by "accelerating the globalization of ICANN and IANA"?
>
> What’s the test to avoid "scope creep" into issues outside of ICANN’s mandate?
>
> What’s the process ICANN could use to involve bottom-up work on answering the challenge of Montevideo, Brasil Summit, and ITU?
>
> Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
>
> Please respond to this thread with any question/s you propose to raise tomorrow