I know, Edmon. I plan to attend JIG meeting of course ?C I live
in IDN country and won¡¯t miss a thing J
The JIG issues partly were covered in Nairobi at
gNSO/ccNSO dinner. The loudest news since Nairobi was straight-forward resolution
of the Board regarding sync TLDs for China and Taiwan.
Also it will be interesting to hear reps ccNSO members from
China and Taiwan about how they plan to implement the sync restrictions. And I
will do a short update ?C 5 minutes max, the issue kind of hanged after April 22-nd
resolution of the Board.
Will add up potential dname, bname usage / IETF works and
admin enforcements. This all about sync TLDs.
However, there is a world outside. My idea was to run a short
update about this outside world to demonstrate that this world is still ascii
based and there is a long way to go.
If it¡¯s too late to change subjects ?C fine, I¡¯ll do sync TLDs
and attracted council members can join the IDN software developers consortium
on June 19th
--andrei
From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@registry.asia]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:13 PM
To: 'Gomes,
Chuck'; 'Andrei Kolesnikov'; council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] Topics for Joint Meetings in Brussels
Andrei,
I
believe you are with us at the JIG as well. This has been identified as
one of the issues of common interest. Would be good to further these
discussions there as well.
We
will have a meeting in Brussels as well. The meeting is set for Tuesday morning
8am (http://brussels38.icann.org/full-schedule)
Edmon
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2010 4:52 AM
To: Andrei Kolesnikov; council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] Topics for Joint Meetings in Brussels
Unfortunately, I sent Chris the two proposed topics yesterday
and he was planning on discussing them with the ccNSO today so it may be too
late to change topics now. Assuming it is not too late, we would need to
keep the topics to a minimum because we only have 90 minutes and part of that
will be taken up by lunch. In my opinion, topics should be of general
interest to most people in attendance and not too technical. Topics that
benefit from joint ccNSO/GNSO discussion are ideal.
Chuck
From: Andrei Kolesnikov [mailto:andrei@cctld.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 3:33 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] Topics for Joint Meetings in Brussels
Dear colleagues,
Regarding gNSO/ccNSO meeting and sync TLDs as a topic. I
propose a different theme, because I have a feeling, that Sync TLD theme today
has a very limited implication, refer to Board resolution:
Whereas, the methodology to be taken by the IDN ccTLD manager to
handle these particular instances of parallel IDN ccTLDs is, in the short-term,
the only option available, but there are serious limits to where such an
approach is viable in practice, so that it cannot be viewed as a general
solution, and that consequently, long-term development work should be pursued;
Whereas, significant analysis and possibly development work should
continue on both policy-based and technical elements of a solution for the
introduction on a more general basis of strings containing variants as TLD;
My recommendation to gNSO and ccNSO councilors is to focus on
interesting and ¡°yet unknown¡± issues of ¡°IDNs in non-IDN world¡±. Please
find below a short list of issues to cover:
|
IDNs
in NON-IDN world |
The issues and problems for the
end users, registrars and registries are very similar: this world is not
ready for IDNs |
|
Support
of browsers |
Overview of browsers behavior.
DNS traffic cash-in: why local script goes to .COM? Why Google is my default
for the IDN script / browser localization? How IDN development changes the
food chain of typos, not-founds? |
|
Support
of email |
Email functionality adds up to IDN
popularity. Update on IETF. |
|
IDN
code: ¡°IDN-ization¡±, where to stop? |
IDN code
§Ô§ä§ä§á://§á§â§Ö§Ù§Ú§Õ§Ö§ß§ä.§â§æ/§á§à§ã§ä§Ñ§ß§à§Ó§Ý§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ/§á§â§Ú§Ü§Ñ§Ù1.§Ô§ä§ñ§â |
|
Community
activities to get the thing done right |
what can be done jointly ccNSO /
gNSO to speed up IDN support on application level? What should we demand? |
Best regards,
--andrei
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 12:36 AM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] Topics for Joint Meetings in Brussels
Importance: High
<<Survey for Board meeting with GNSO in
Brussels.docx>>
Assuming I
didn¡¯t miss anyone¡¯s preferences, here is a summary of support for discussion
topics in our joint meetings in Brussels:
GAC/GNSO
meeting
1. DAG 4, including morality and public order
o Support: Bill, Jaime, Wolf, Mary
o Oppose:
2. AoC, including A&T RT and next reviews
o Support: Bill, Jaime, Wolf, Mary
o Oppose:
3. RAA
o Support: Chuck, Mary?
o Oppose:
4. IDN ccPDP
o Support:
o Oppose: Chuck,
If
there are no objections by Monday, I plan to suggest to Janis that we discuss
topics 1 & 2 with the GAC. And would like to request a volunteer (or
volunteers) to draft a brief (less than 5 minutes) intro to each topic
including any questions we might have for the GAC.
Board/Staff/GNSO
dinner meeting
1. There
are rumblings that there are some on the Board who think this meeting has
outlived its usefulness; in light of that, it might be useful to discuss the
value or lack of value from both the GNSO and Board/Staff perspective.
o Support:
Chuck, St¨¦phane
o Oppose:
2. What do
Board members understand about the AoC commitment to promote
competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice in the DNS marketplace, with a
particular focus on GNSO work
o Support:
Rosemary, Wolf
o Oppose:
3. ICANN
and Internet governance directions
o Support:
Terry, Bill, Jaime, Rafik, Mary
o Oppose:
Wolf
4. DAG 4, including morality and public order
o Support: Wolf, Mary
Note that I sent
the attached survey to Bruce Tonkin for the purpose of
getting individual Board responses and asking Bruce what the
best way of doing that would be.
ccNSO/GNSO
meeting
1. DNS-CERT
o Support:
Chuck, Bill, Mary
o Oppose:
2. Synchronized TLDs
o Support: Andrei
o Oppose:
If there are no
objections by Monday, I will send these topics to Chris. Andrei has volunteered
to prepare a brief intro to the Synchronized TLDs topic. We need a
volunteer for the DNS-CERT to do the same.
No
virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.829 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2924 - Release Date: 06/08/10 14:35:00